• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享安全网行动计划(SSNAP):一项共同设计的干预措施,旨在减少癌症诊断的延误。

The Shared Safety Net Action Plan (SSNAP): a co-designed intervention to reduce delays in cancer diagnosis.

机构信息

Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford.

Medical Examiner Office, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jul 28;72(721):e581-e591. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0476. Print 2022 Aug.

DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2021.0476
PMID:35379601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8999718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safety netting in primary care may help diagnose cancer earlier, but it is unclear what the format and content of an acceptable safety-netting intervention would be. This project aimed to co-design a safety-netting intervention with and for primary care patients and staff.

AIM

This work sought to address how a safety-netting intervention would be implemented in practice; and, if and how a safety-netting intervention would be acceptable to all stakeholders.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Patient representatives, GPs, and nurse practitioners were invited to a series of co-design workshops. Patients who had and had not received a diagnosis of cancer and primary care practices took part in separate focus groups.

METHOD

Three workshops using creative co-design processes developed the format and content of the intervention prototype. The COM-B Framework underpinned five focus groups to establish views on capability, opportunity, and motivation to use the intervention to assist with prototype refinement.

RESULTS

Workshops and focus groups suggested the intervention format and content should incorporate visual and written communication specifying clear timelines for monitoring symptoms and when to present back; be available in paper and electronic forms linked to existing computer systems; and be able to be delivered within a 10-minute consultation. Intervention use themes included 'building confidence through partnership', 'using familiar and current procedures and systems', and 'seeing value'.

CONCLUSION

The Shared Safety Net Action Plan (SSNAP) - a safety-netting intervention to assist the timely diagnosis of cancer in primary care, was successfully co-designed with and for patients and primary care staff.

摘要

背景

初级保健中的安全网措施可能有助于更早地诊断癌症,但目前尚不清楚可接受的安全网干预措施的形式和内容是什么。本项目旨在与初级保健患者和医护人员共同设计一种安全网干预措施。

目的

这项工作旨在解决安全网干预措施将如何在实践中实施的问题;以及安全网干预措施是否以及如何能被所有利益相关者接受。

设计和设置

邀请患者代表、全科医生和执业护师参加一系列共同设计研讨会。参加过和未参加过癌症诊断的患者以及初级保健实践参加了单独的焦点小组。

方法

使用创意共同设计流程的三个研讨会制定了干预原型的格式和内容。COM-B 框架为五个焦点小组提供了基础,以了解使用该干预措施协助原型完善的能力、机会和动机的观点。

结果

研讨会和焦点小组表明,干预措施的形式和内容应包括视觉和书面沟通,明确规定监测症状和何时返回的时间表;以纸质和电子形式提供,与现有计算机系统相链接;并能在 10 分钟的咨询中完成。干预使用主题包括“通过伙伴关系建立信心”、“使用熟悉和当前的程序和系统”和“看到价值”。

结论

共同设计了“共同安全网行动计划(SSNAP)”——一种安全网干预措施,以帮助在初级保健中及时诊断癌症,该计划是与患者和初级保健医护人员共同设计的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e106/9343028/1724bc947b69/bjgpaug-2022-72-721-e581-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e106/9343028/e38ad3750024/bjgpaug-2022-72-721-e581-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e106/9343028/a98013eb8034/bjgpaug-2022-72-721-e581-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e106/9343028/1724bc947b69/bjgpaug-2022-72-721-e581-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e106/9343028/e38ad3750024/bjgpaug-2022-72-721-e581-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e106/9343028/a98013eb8034/bjgpaug-2022-72-721-e581-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e106/9343028/1724bc947b69/bjgpaug-2022-72-721-e581-3.jpg

相似文献

1
The Shared Safety Net Action Plan (SSNAP): a co-designed intervention to reduce delays in cancer diagnosis.共享安全网行动计划(SSNAP):一项共同设计的干预措施,旨在减少癌症诊断的延误。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jul 28;72(721):e581-e591. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0476. Print 2022 Aug.
2
The early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: A qualitative exploration of the patient's role and acceptable safety-netting strategies.初级保健中癌症的早期诊断:对患者角色和可接受的安全网策略的定性探讨。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Jan;29(1):e13195. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13195. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
3
Acceptability of text messages for safety netting patients with low-risk cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.低危癌症症状患者安全网短信可接受性的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e333-e341. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695741. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
4
Safety netting for primary care: evidence from a literature review.初级保健的安全网:文献综述证据。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jan;69(678):e70-e79. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X700193. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
5
Perceived benefits and challenges of using an electronic cancer prediction system for safety netting in primary care: An exploratory study of C the signs.基于 C 指征的电子癌症预测系统用于初级保健安全网的感知益处和挑战:一项探索性研究
Health Informatics J. 2024 Oct-Dec;30(4):14604582241279742. doi: 10.1177/14604582241279742.
6
Patients' and clinicians' views on the appropriate use of safety-netting advice in consultations-an interview study from Sweden.患者和临床医生对咨询中使用安全网建议的适当性的看法——来自瑞典的访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 5;13(10):e077938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077938.
7
Quality improvements of safety-netting guidelines for cancer in UK primary care: insights from a qualitative interview study of GPs.英国初级保健中癌症安全网指南的质量改进:全科医生定性访谈研究的见解。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e819-e826. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706565. Print 2019 Dec.
8
How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study.肺癌症状的安全网如何帮助患者进行适当的再咨询?一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 20;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01791-y.
9
Safety netting in routine primary care consultations: an observational study using video-recorded UK consultations.常规初级保健咨询中的安全网:使用英国视频记录咨询的观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e878-e886. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706601. Print 2019 Dec.
10
Development of a tool for coding safety-netting behaviours in primary care: a mixed-methods study using existing UK consultation recordings.开发一种用于编码初级保健中安全网行为的工具:使用现有英国咨询录音的混合方法研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e869-e877. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706589. Print 2019 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-designing a recruitment strategy for lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals: protocol for a mixed-methods study.共同设计高危个体肺癌筛查的招募策略:一项混合方法研究的方案
HRB Open Res. 2023 Nov 13;6:64. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13793.1. eCollection 2023.
2
Patient preferences for investigating cancer-related symptoms in Australian general practice: a discrete-choice experiment.患者对澳大利亚全科医疗中调查癌症相关症状的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jul 25;74(745):e517-e526. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0583. Print 2024 Aug.