• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低危癌症症状患者安全网短信可接受性的定性研究。

Acceptability of text messages for safety netting patients with low-risk cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London.

Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University, London.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e333-e341. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695741. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp18X695741
PMID:29581127
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5916080/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Safety netting is an important diagnostic strategy for patients presenting to primary care with potential (low-risk) cancer symptoms. Typically, this involves asking patients to return if symptoms persist. However, this relies on patients re-appraising their symptoms and making follow-up appointments, which could contribute to delays in diagnosis. Text messaging is increasingly used in primary care to communicate with patients, and could be used to improve safety netting.

AIM

To explore the acceptability and feasibility of using text messages to safety net patients presenting with low-risk cancer symptoms in GP primary care (txt-netting).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative focus group and interview study with London-based GPs.

METHOD

Participants were identified using convenience sampling methods. Five focus groups and two interviews were conducted with 22 GPs between August and December 2016. Sessions were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

GPs were amenable to the concept of using text messages in cancer safety netting, identifying it as an additional tool that could help manage patients and promote symptom awareness. There was wide variation in GP preferences for text message content, and a number of important potential barriers to txt-netting were identified. Concerns were raised about the difficulties of conveying complex safety netting advice within the constraints of a text message, and about confidentiality, widening inequalities, and workload implications.

CONCLUSION

Text messages were perceived to be an acceptable potential strategy for safety netting patients with low-risk cancer symptoms. Further work is needed to ensure it is cost-effective, user friendly, confidential, and acceptable to patients.

摘要

背景

对于因潜在(低风险)癌症症状而到初级保健机构就诊的患者,安全网策略是一种重要的诊断策略。通常,这包括要求患者如果症状持续存在则返回。但是,这取决于患者重新评估其症状并进行后续预约,这可能导致诊断延迟。短信在初级保健中越来越多地用于与患者进行沟通,并且可以用于改善安全网。

目的

探索使用短信对在普通科医生初级保健中出现低风险癌症症状的患者进行安全网(txt-netting)的可接受性和可行性。

设计和设置

使用伦敦普通科医生的定性焦点小组和访谈研究。

方法

使用便利抽样方法确定参与者。2016 年 8 月至 12 月,对 22 名普通科医生进行了五次焦点小组和两次访谈。会议进行了录音,并逐字转录,然后使用主题分析进行了分析。

结果

普通科医生对使用短信进行癌症安全网的概念持开放态度,认为这是一种可以帮助管理患者和促进症状意识的附加工具。普通科医生对短信内容的偏好存在很大差异,并确定了一些 txt-netting 的潜在重要障碍。人们对在短信的限制内传达复杂的安全网建议的困难表示担忧,还对保密性、扩大不平等和工作量影响表示担忧。

结论

短信被认为是一种可接受的潜在策略,可用于对低风险癌症症状的患者进行安全网。需要进一步的工作,以确保其具有成本效益、用户友好、保密且被患者接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/256b/5916080/0443439a0ec7/bjgpMay-2018-68-670-e333-OA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/256b/5916080/0443439a0ec7/bjgpMay-2018-68-670-e333-OA.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/256b/5916080/0443439a0ec7/bjgpMay-2018-68-670-e333-OA.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptability of text messages for safety netting patients with low-risk cancer symptoms: a qualitative study.低危癌症症状患者安全网短信可接受性的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e333-e341. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695741. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
2
GPs' understanding and practice of safety netting for potential cancer presentations: a qualitative study in primary care.全科医生对潜在癌症表现进行安全网措施的理解和实践:初级保健中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jul;68(672):e505-e511. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X696233. Epub 2018 May 8.
3
Use of text messaging in general practice: a mixed methods investigation on GPs' and patients' views.在全科医学中使用短信:对全科医生和患者观点的混合方法调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):e744-e750. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693065. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
4
Quality improvements of safety-netting guidelines for cancer in UK primary care: insights from a qualitative interview study of GPs.英国初级保健中癌症安全网指南的质量改进:全科医生定性访谈研究的见解。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e819-e826. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706565. Print 2019 Dec.
5
How do general practitioners use 'safety netting' in acutely ill children?全科医生如何在急症患儿中运用“安全网”措施?
Eur J Gen Pract. 2016;22(1):3-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1092516. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
6
How do GPs and patients share the responsibility for cancer safety netting follow-up actions? A qualitative interview study of GPs and patients in Oxfordshire, UK.全科医生和患者如何分担癌症安全网后续行动的责任?对英国牛津郡的全科医生和患者进行的定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e029316. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029316.
7
How does safety netting for lung cancer symptoms help patients to reconsult appropriately? A qualitative study.肺癌症状的安全网如何帮助患者进行适当的再咨询?一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 20;23(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01791-y.
8
Safety netting advice for respiratory tract infections in out-of-hours primary care: A qualitative analysis of consultation videos.非工作时间初级保健中呼吸道感染的安全网建议:咨询视频的定性分析。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):87-94. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2064448.
9
Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs.应对临床诊疗中同理心的障碍:一项针对全科医生的定性访谈研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e887-e895. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687565. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
Patients' and clinicians' views on the appropriate use of safety-netting advice in consultations-an interview study from Sweden.患者和临床医生对咨询中使用安全网建议的适当性的看法——来自瑞典的访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 5;13(10):e077938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077938.

引用本文的文献

1
Prehabilitation Strategies: Enhancing Surgical Resilience with a Focus on Nutritional Optimization and Multimodal Interventions.术前康复策略:通过关注营养优化和多模式干预提高手术耐受性
Adv Nutr. 2025 Apr;16(4):100392. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100392. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
2
Using an SMS to improve bowel cancer screening: the acceptability and feasibility of a multifaceted intervention.利用短信改善肠癌筛查:多方面干预措施的可接受性与可行性
Fam Pract. 2025 Jan 17;42(1). doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae073.
3
Safety-netting advice documentation in out-of-hours primary care: a retrospective cohort from 2013 to 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of text messaging in general practice: a mixed methods investigation on GPs' and patients' views.在全科医学中使用短信:对全科医生和患者观点的混合方法调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Nov;67(664):e744-e750. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693065. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
Text-message Reminders in Colorectal Cancer Screening (TRICCS): a randomised controlled trial.结直肠癌筛查中的短信提醒(TRICCS):一项随机对照试验。
Br J Cancer. 2017 May 23;116(11):1408-1414. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.117. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
Can safety-netting improve cancer detection in patients with vague symptoms?
非工作时间初级医疗中的安全网建议记录:一项2013年至2020年的回顾性队列研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jan 30;75(751):e80-e89. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0057. Print 2025 Feb.
4
Transforming post pandemic cancer services.后疫情时期的癌症服务转型。
Br J Cancer. 2024 May;130(8):1233-1238. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02596-9. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Patient preferences for investigating cancer-related symptoms in Australian general practice: a discrete-choice experiment.患者对澳大利亚全科医疗中调查癌症相关症状的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jul 25;74(745):e517-e526. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0583. Print 2024 Aug.
6
SAFETY NETTING CONCEPT IN PRIMARY CARE CONSULTATION.基层医疗会诊中的安全网概念。
Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2023 Aug;21(2):24-29.
7
Electronic safety-netting tool features considered important by UK general practice staff: an interview and Delphi consensus study.英国全科医疗工作人员认为重要的电子安全网工具特性:一项访谈与德尔菲共识研究
BJGP Open. 2023 Sep 19;7(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0163. Print 2023 Sep.
8
Harnessing the Electronic Health Care Record to Optimize Patient Safety in Primary Care: Framework for Evaluating e-Safety-Netting Tools.利用电子健康记录优化初级保健中的患者安全:评估电子安全网工具的框架
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 1;10(8):e35726. doi: 10.2196/35726.
9
Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care.优化全科医生提供建议的沟通方式,以促进患者的自我护理,并在诊断不确定时及时进行随访:初级保健中“安全网”的实际审查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jul;31(7):541-554. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014529. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
10
Healthcare practices that increase the quality of care in cancer trajectories from a general practice perspective: a scoping review.从全科医学角度提高癌症治疗轨迹中护理质量的医疗实践:范围综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):11-28. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2036421. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
安全网措施能否提高有模糊症状患者的癌症检出率?
BMJ. 2016 Nov 9;355:i5515. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5515.
4
Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland.患者与初级保健医生之间电子邮件、手机和短信的使用:瑞士法语区的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 5;16(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1776-9.
5
Understanding missed opportunities for more timely diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic patients after presentation.了解有症状患者就诊后在更及时诊断癌症方面错失的机会。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S84-91. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.47.
6
Cancer detection in primary care: insights from general practitioners.基层医疗中的癌症检测:全科医生的见解。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S41-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.41.
7
Delays in diagnosis of young females with symptomatic cervical cancer in England: an interview-based study.英国有症状宫颈癌年轻女性的诊断延误:一项基于访谈的研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Oct;64(627):e602-10. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681757.
8
"They just say everything's a virus"--parent's judgment of the credibility of clinician communication in primary care consultations for respiratory tract infections in children: a qualitative study.“他们只是说一切都是病毒引起的”——家长对基层医疗中儿童呼吸道感染会诊时临床医生沟通可信度的判断:一项定性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
9
Miscommunication between patients and general practitioners: implications for clinical practice.患者与全科医生之间的沟通不畅:对临床实践的影响。
J Prim Health Care. 2013 Jun 1;5(2):123-8.
10
Patient safety strategies targeted at diagnostic errors: a systematic review.针对诊断错误的患者安全策略:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):381-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00004.