Suppr超能文献

日本教学医院的住院医师制度对住院患者死亡率和住院时间的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。

Impact of the hospitalist system on inpatient mortality and length of hospital stay in a teaching hospital in Japan: a retrospective observational study.

机构信息

Hospital Medicine, Urasoe General Hospital, Urasoe, Okinawa, Japan

Patient Safetty, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e054246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054246.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the differences in the quality of care among inpatients before and after the introduction of the hospitalist system.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

A community teaching hospital in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

The inpatients admitted between the preintervention (January-December 2018) and 1-year intervention (January-December 2019) periods. There were 8508 and 8788 inpatients in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

INTERVENTIONS

The study compared the lengths of hospital stay and mortality among inpatients between the pre-and post-intervention (2018 and 2019) periods concerning the introduction of a hospital medicine department.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary objective was to evaluate and compare the in-hospital mortality and the length of stay (LOS) between 2018 and 2019. The secondary objective was to identify the characteristics of hospitalists and non-hospitalists in the system.

RESULTS

The LOS was significantly reduced after the introduction of the hospital medicine department (adjusted difference, -0.659 days; 95% CI -1.118 to -0.136, p=0.01). There were no differences in the adjusted mortalities between the two periods.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first involving a teaching hospital in Japan to reveal that the hospitalist system had a positive effect on the efficiency of inpatient care by shortening the LOS. Further studies are needed to clarify other benefits related to the introduction of the hospital medicine department in Japan.

摘要

目的

考察在引入医院医师系统前后,住院患者的护理质量差异。

设计

回顾性观察研究。

地点

日本一家社区教学医院。

参与者

在干预前(2018 年 1 月至 12 月)和干预后(2019 年 1 月至 12 月)期间住院的患者。2018 年和 2019 年分别有 8508 名和 8788 名住院患者。

干预措施

该研究比较了在引入医院医学部后(2018 年和 2019 年)干预前和干预后住院患者的住院时间和死亡率。

结果

在引入医院医学部后,住院时间明显缩短(调整差异,-0.659 天;95%置信区间-1.118 至-0.136,p=0.01)。两个时期的调整死亡率没有差异。

结论

据我们所知,我们的研究是日本第一家涉及教学医院的研究,表明医院医师系统通过缩短住院时间对住院患者护理的效率产生了积极影响。需要进一步的研究来阐明在日本引入医院医学部的其他益处。

相似文献

5
7
9
A comparison of two hospitalist models with traditional care in a community teaching hospital.
Am J Med. 2005 May;118(5):536-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.027.
10
The effect of a hospitalist comanagement service on vascular surgery inpatients.
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

3
How Do We Establish the Utility and Evidence of General Medicine in Japan?
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Feb 22;17:635-638. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S451260. eCollection 2024.
5
Will the Introduction of the Hospitalist System Save Japan?
Intern Med. 2023 Apr 15;62(8):1105-1106. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0693-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction in Inpatient Care Provided by Hospitalists and Nonhospitalists in South Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158101.
3
Development and Evolution of Hospital Medicine in Korea.
J Hosp Med. 2021 Apr;16(4):247-250. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3573.
4
The new era of academic hospitalist in Japan.
J Gen Fam Med. 2020 Jan 30;21(2):29-30. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.299. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
Impact of the Hospitalist System in Japan on the Quality of Care and Healthcare Economics.
Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;58(23):3385-3391. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2872-19. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
7
The Impact of Hospitalist Care in Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 1;34(25):e177. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e177.
8
Impact of hospitalists on the efficiency of inpatient care and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2019 Apr 12;9(2):121-134. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2019.1591901. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Standardising hospitalist practice in sepsis and COPD care.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Oct;28(10):800-808. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008829. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验