Suppr超能文献

医院医师照护模式对急性内科单元患者结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

Impact of hospitalist care model on patient outcomes in acute medical unit: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).

Department of Nursing, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Korea (the Republic of).

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 3;13(8):e069561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069561.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess a newly introduced, hospitalist-run, acute medical unit (AMU) care model at a tertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital in the Republic of Korea.

PARTICIPANTS

We evaluated 6391 medical inpatients admitted through the emergency department (ED) from 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

The study compared multiple outcomes among medical inpatients from the ED between the non-hospitalist group and the AMU hospitalist group.

OUTCOME MEASURES

In-hospital mortality (IHM), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, hospital length of stay (LOS), ED-LOS and unscheduled readmission rates were defined as patient outcomes and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-hospitalist group, the AMU hospitalist group had lower IHM (OR: 0.43, p<0.001), a lower ICU admission rate (OR: 0.72, p=0.013), a shorter LOS (coefficient: -0.984, SE: 0.318; p=0.002) and a shorter ED-LOS (coefficient: -3.021, SE: 0.256; p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the 10-day or 30-day readmission rates (p=0.974, p=0.965, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The AMU hospitalist care model was associated with reductions in IHM, ICU admission rate, LOS and ED-LOS. These findings suggest that the AMU hospitalist care model has the potential to be adopted into other healthcare systems to improve care for patients with acute medical needs.

摘要

目的

评估韩国一家三级保健医院新引入的由医院医师管理的急性内科单元(AMU)护理模式。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

设置

韩国的一家三级保健医院。

参与者

我们评估了 2016 年 6 月 1 日至 2017 年 5 月 31 日期间通过急诊室(ED)收治的 6391 例内科住院患者。

干预措施

本研究比较了 ED 内科住院患者中无医院医师组和 AMU 医院医师组的多项结局。

结果

与无医院医师组相比,AMU 医院医师组的院内死亡率(IHM)(比值比:0.43,p<0.001)、重症监护病房(ICU)入住率(比值比:0.72,p=0.013)较低、住院时间(系数:-0.984,SE:0.318;p=0.002)和 ED 停留时间(系数:-3.021,SE:0.256;p<0.001)更短。10 天或 30 天再入院率无显著差异(p=0.974,p=0.965)。

结论

AMU 医院医师护理模式与 IHM、ICU 入住率、住院时间和 ED 停留时间的降低相关。这些发现表明,AMU 医院医师护理模式有可能被纳入其他医疗保健系统,以改善对有急性医疗需求的患者的护理。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Surgical Comanagement by Hospitalists in Colorectal Surgery.外科医院医师在结直肠外科中的共同管理。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Oct;227(4):404-410.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Acute medical units: The way to go? A literature review.急性医疗单元:可行之路?文献综述。
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Apr;39:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
10
Zero to 50,000 - The 20th Anniversary of the Hospitalist.从零到五万——住院医师制度诞生20周年
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 15;375(11):1009-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607958. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验