• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于价值的医疗保健领域证据:推动透明的真实世界研究、数据和证据传播。

Value-based evidence across health care sectors: a push for transparent real-world studies, data, and evidence dissemination.

机构信息

Excerpta Medica B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP), Tarrytown, NY, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Oct;17(4):416-427. doi: 10.1017/S1744133122000056. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1017/S1744133122000056
PMID:35382923
Abstract

There is currently a heightened need for transparency in pharmaceutical sectors. The inclusion of real-world (RW) evidence, in addition to clinical trial evidence, in decision-making processes, was an important step forward toward a more inclusive established value proposition. This advance has introduced new transparency challenges. Increasing transparency is a critical step toward accelerating improvement in type, quality, and access to data, regardless of whether these originate from clinical trials or from RW studies. However, so far, advances in transparency have been relatively restricted to clinical trials, and there remains a lack of similar expectations or standards of transparency concerning the generation and reporting of RW data. This perspective paper aims to highlight the need for transparency concerning RW studies, data, and evidence across health care sectors, to identify areas for improvement, and provide concrete recommendations and practices for the future. Specific issues are discussed from different stakeholder perspectives, culminating in recommended actions, from individual stakeholder perspectives, for improved RW study, data, and evidence transparency. Furthermore, a list of potential guidelines for consideration by stakeholders is proposed. While recommendations from different stakeholder perspectives are made, true transparency in the processes involved in the generation, reporting, and use of RW evidence will require a concerted effort from all stakeholders across health care sectors.

摘要

目前,制药行业需要提高透明度。在决策过程中纳入真实世界(RW)证据,除了临床试验证据,这是朝着更具包容性的既定价值主张迈出的重要一步。这一进展带来了新的透明度挑战。提高透明度是加速改善数据的类型、质量和获取的关键步骤,无论这些数据是来自临床试验还是来自 RW 研究。然而,到目前为止,透明度的提高相对局限于临床试验,对于 RW 数据的生成和报告,仍然缺乏类似的透明度期望或标准。本文旨在强调在整个医疗保健领域提高 RW 研究、数据和证据透明度的必要性,确定需要改进的领域,并为未来提供具体的建议和实践。从不同利益相关者的角度讨论了具体问题,最终为改进 RW 研究、数据和证据透明度提出了来自各个利益相关者的建议行动。此外,还提出了一份潜在指南清单供利益相关者考虑。虽然从不同利益相关者的角度提出了建议,但要实现 RW 证据生成、报告和使用过程的真正透明度,需要医疗保健各个领域的所有利益相关者共同努力。

相似文献

1
Value-based evidence across health care sectors: a push for transparent real-world studies, data, and evidence dissemination.基于价值的医疗保健领域证据:推动透明的真实世界研究、数据和证据传播。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2022 Oct;17(4):416-427. doi: 10.1017/S1744133122000056. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report.利用真实世界数据进行覆盖范围和支付决策:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会(ISPOR)真实世界数据特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):326-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00186.x.
4
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
5
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
6
Promoting transparency, accountability, and access through a multi-stakeholder initiative: lessons from the medicines transparency alliance.通过多方利益相关者倡议促进透明度、问责制和获取:来自药品透明度联盟的经验教训。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Jun 2;10:18. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0106-x. eCollection 2017.
7
Improving Transparency to Build Trust in Real-World Secondary Data Studies for Hypothesis Testing-Why, What, and How: Recommendations and a Road Map from the Real-World Evidence Transparency Initiative.提高透明度以建立对假设检验的真实世界二次数据研究的信任——原因、内容和方法:来自真实世界证据透明度倡议的建议和路线图。
Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1128-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.002.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
Improving transparency to build trust in real-world secondary data studies for hypothesis testing-Why, what, and how: recommendations and a road map from the real-world evidence transparency initiative.提高透明度以增强对用于假设检验的真实世界二次数据研究的信任——为何、是什么以及如何做:来自真实世界证据透明度倡议的建议和路线图
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Nov;29(11):1504-1513. doi: 10.1002/pds.5079. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
10
Achieving Appropriate Model Transparency: Challenges and Potential Solutions for Making Value-Based Decisions in the United States.实现适当的模型透明度:在美国做出基于价值的决策所面临的挑战和潜在解决方案。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Nov;37(11):1321-1327. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00832-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Transparency in the secondary use of health data: assessing the status quo of guidance and best practices.健康数据二次使用中的透明度:评估指南和最佳实践的现状
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 26;12(3):241364. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241364. eCollection 2025 Mar.