Sandom Fiona, Hearnshaw Simon, Grant Siobhan, Williams Lynne, Brocklehurst Paul
School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, UK.
NHS England, North Yorkshire and the Humber Area, UK.
Br Dent J. 2022 Apr 5:1-8. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4140-y.
Introduction An In-Practice Prevention (IPP) programme was developed by the Local Dental Network in the North Yorkshire and the Humber area in England in response to an oral health needs assessment. The underpinning logic model drew on a flexible commissioning approach and aimed to incentivise dental teams with NHS contracts to promote the delivery of prevention. This used care pathways that involved the whole dental team and was cost-neutral.Aim The programme was evaluated using realist methodology to identify 'what works, in which circumstances, how and for who?'.Design Realist evaluations are explanatory in nature and attempt to understand the factors that appear to influence the success (or not) of an intervention, rather than demonstrating causality.Methods and results Following a review of the pertinent literature, semi-structured interviews and focus groups, five theory areas were considered to be critical to the delivery of IPP. In order of stated priority, these were: 1) clinical leadership; 2) 'skill mix'; 3) financial incentives; 4) institutional logic/practice culture; and 5) behaviour change.Conclusion The results appear to show that clinically-led programmes could offer value to dental commissioners within a flexible commissioning model, although this would need to be further tested using an experiment design.
引言
英格兰北约克郡和亨伯地区的地方牙科网络根据口腔健康需求评估制定了一项实践中预防(IPP)计划。其基础逻辑模型采用了灵活的委托方式,旨在激励签订国民保健制度合同的牙科团队推广预防措施的实施。该计划采用了涉及整个牙科团队的护理路径,且成本保持中性。
目的
该计划采用现实主义方法进行评估,以确定“在何种情况下、如何以及对谁有效?”
设计
现实主义评估本质上具有解释性,试图理解那些似乎影响干预成功与否的因素,而非证明因果关系。
方法与结果
在对相关文献、半结构化访谈和焦点小组进行审查之后,确定了五个理论领域对IPP的实施至关重要。按所述优先级排序,分别为:1)临床领导力;2)“技能组合”;3)经济激励措施;4)机构逻辑/实践文化;5)行为改变。
结论
结果似乎表明,临床主导的计划在灵活的委托模式下可为牙科委托方提供价值,不过这需要通过实验设计进一步验证。