The University of Liverpool Department of Health Services Research, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;94:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
We investigate the organisational field of general dental practice and how agents change or maintain the institution of values associated with the everyday work of health care provision. Our dataset comprise archival literature and policy documents, interview data from field level actors, as well as service delivery level interview data and secondary data gathered (2011-12) from 16 English dental practices. Our analysis provides a typology of institutional logics (prevailing systems of value) experienced in the field of dental practice. Confirming current literature, we find two logics dominate how care is assessed: business-like health care and medical professionalism. We advance the literature by finding the business-like health care logic further distinguished by values of commercialism on the one hand and those of accountability and procedural diligence on the other. The logic of professionalism we also find is further distinguished into a commitment to clinical expertise and independence in delivering patient care on the one hand, and concerns for the autonomy and sustainability of a business enterprise on the other.
我们研究了普通牙科实践的组织领域,以及代理人如何改变或维护与医疗保健提供日常工作相关的价值观体系。我们的数据集包括档案文献和政策文件、来自现场行动者的访谈数据,以及(2011-12 年)从 16 家英国牙科实践中收集的服务提供层面的访谈数据和二手数据。我们的分析提供了在牙科实践领域中体验到的制度逻辑(占主导地位的价值体系)的类型学。证实了现有文献,我们发现有两种逻辑主导着护理的评估:商业化的医疗保健和医学专业主义。我们通过发现商业医疗保健逻辑一方面具有商业主义价值观,另一方面具有问责制和程序严谨性价值观,进一步推进了文献。我们还发现专业主义逻辑进一步分为一方面对提供患者护理的临床专业知识和独立性的承诺,另一方面对企业自主权和可持续性的关注。