Suppr超能文献

大、小筛状结构在前列腺癌活检中的临床不良预后相似。

Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Histopathology. 2022 Jun;80(7):1041-1049. doi: 10.1111/his.14658. Epub 2022 May 4.

Abstract

AIMS

Invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) are associated with adverse outcome in prostate cancer patients, with the large cribriform pattern having the worst outcome in radical prostatectomies. Our objective was to determine the impact of the large and small cribriform patterns in prostate cancer biopsies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pathological revision was carried out on biopsies of 1887 patients from the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. The large cribriform pattern was defined as having at least twice the size of adjacent benign glands. The median follow-up time was 13.4 years. Hazard ratios for metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Any cribriform pattern was found in 280 of 1887 men: 1.1% IDC in grade group (GG) 1, 18.2% in GG2, 57.1% in GG3, 55.4% in GG4 and 59.3% in GG5; the large cribriform pattern was present in 0, 0.5, 9.8, 18.1 and 17.3%, respectively. In multivariable analyses, small and large cribriform patterns were both (P < 0.005) associated with worse MFS [small: hazard ratio (HR) = 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.93-4.78; large: HR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.68-5.99] and DSS (small: HR = 4.07, 95% CI = 2.51-6.62; large: HR = 4.13, 95% CI = 2.14-7.98). Patients with the large cribriform pattern did not have worse MFS (P = 0.77) or DSS (P = 0.96) than those with the small cribriform pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Both small and large cribriform patterns are associated with worse MFS and DSS in prostate cancer biopsies. Patients with the large cribriform pattern on biopsy have a similar adverse outcome as those with the small cribriform pattern.

摘要

目的

在前列腺癌患者中,有侵袭性筛状和管内癌(IDC)与不良预后相关,其中大筛状模式在根治性前列腺切除术中预后最差。我们的目的是确定前列腺癌活检中大筛状和小筛状模式的影响。

方法和结果

对来自欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究的 1887 名患者的活检进行了病理复查。大筛状模式的定义为至少是相邻良性腺体大小的两倍。中位随访时间为 13.4 年。使用 Cox 比例风险回归计算无转移生存(MFS)和疾病特异性生存(DSS)的风险比。在 1887 名男性中发现了任何筛状模式:1.1%的 IDC 在 GG1 组,18.2%在 GG2 组,57.1%在 GG3 组,55.4%在 GG4 组,59.3%在 GG5 组;大筛状模式分别为 0、0.5、9.8、18.1 和 17.3%。多变量分析显示,小筛状和大筛状模式均与较差的 MFS 相关(小筛状:危险比[HR] = 3.04,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.93-4.78;大筛状:HR = 3.17,95%CI = 1.68-5.99)和 DSS(小筛状:HR = 4.07,95%CI = 2.51-6.62;大筛状:HR = 4.13,95%CI = 2.14-7.98)。与小筛状模式相比,大筛状模式患者的 MFS(P=0.77)或 DSS(P=0.96)无差异。

结论

小筛状和大筛状模式均与前列腺癌活检中的 MFS 和 DSS 较差相关。活检中大筛状模式的患者与小筛状模式患者的不良预后相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67bc/9321809/aba0b450be43/HIS-80-1041-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验