• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在活检中存在浸润性筛状或管内生长的情况下,预测 Gleason 评分 3+4=7 前列腺癌的结果优于 4 级百分比。

Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Josephine Nefkens Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2017 Aug;30(8):1126-1132. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.29. Epub 2017 May 19.

DOI:10.1038/modpathol.2017.29
PMID:28530220
Abstract

Relative increase of grade 4 and presence of invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma have individually been associated with adverse outcome of Gleason score 7 (GS 7) prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the relation of Gleason grade 4 tumor percentage (%GG4) and invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma in GS 3+4=7 prostate cancer biopsies. We reviewed 1031 prostate cancer biopsies from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. In total 370 men had G3+4=7. The relation of invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma and %GG4 with biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) after radical prostatectomy (n=146) and radiation therapy (n=195) was analyzed using Cox regression. Invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma occurred in 7/121 (6%) patients with 1-10% GG4, 29/131 (22%) with 10-25%, and 52/118 (44%) with 25-50% GG4 (P<0.001). In crude analysis, both invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma (HR 2.72; 95% CI: 1.33-5.95; P=0.006) and 10-50% GG4 (HR 2.43; 95% CI: 1.10-5.37; P=0.03) were associated with BCRFS after prostatectomy. In adjusted analysis, invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma was an independent predictor for BCRFS (HR 2.40; 95% CI: 1.03-5.60; P=0.04) after prostatectomy, whereas percentage %GG4 (HR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.97-1.03; P=0.80) was not. While invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma (HR 2.58; 95% CI: 1.59-4.21; P<0.001) performed better than 10-50% GG4 (HR 1.24; 95% CI: 0.67-2.29; P=0.49) for prediction of BCRFS after radiation therapy, both parameters were insignificant in analysis adjusted for prostate-specific antigen (P=0.001), positive biopsies (P<0.001) and tumor volume (P=0.05). In conclusion, increased %GG4 is associated with invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma in GS 3+4=7 prostate cancer biopsies. Invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma is an independent parameter for BCR after prostatectomy, whereas %GG4 is not. The presence of invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma has to be included in pathology reports and should act as exclusion criterion for active surveillance.

摘要

在 GS 7 前列腺癌中,肿瘤分级 4 级的相对增加和存在侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌已分别与不良的 Gleason 评分 7(GS 7)前列腺癌预后相关。本研究的目的是研究 GS 3+4=7 前列腺癌活检中 Gleason 分级 4 级肿瘤百分比(%GG4)和侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌之间的关系。我们回顾了欧洲前列腺癌筛查随机研究中的 1031 例前列腺癌活检。共有 370 名男性患有 G3+4=7。使用 Cox 回归分析根治性前列腺切除术(n=146)和放射治疗(n=195)后侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌和%GG4 与生化无复发生存(BCRFS)之间的关系。在 121 名(6%)1-10% GG4 患者中,29 名(22%)10-25% GG4 和 52 名(44%)25-50% GG4 患者中发生侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌(P<0.001)。在粗分析中,侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌(HR 2.72;95%CI:1.33-5.95;P=0.006)和 10-50% GG4(HR 2.43;95%CI:1.10-5.37;P=0.03)与前列腺切除术后的 BCRFS 相关。在调整分析中,侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌是前列腺切除术后 BCRFS 的独立预测因子(HR 2.40;95%CI:1.03-5.60;P=0.04),而%GG4(HR 1.00;95%CI:0.97-1.03;P=0.80)不是。侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌(HR 2.58;95%CI:1.59-4.21;P<0.001)在预测放射治疗后的 BCRFS 方面优于 10-50% GG4(HR 1.24;95%CI:0.67-2.29;P=0.49),但在调整前列腺特异性抗原(P=0.001)、阳性活检(P<0.001)和肿瘤体积(P=0.05)的分析中,这两个参数均不显著。总之,GS 3+4=7 前列腺癌活检中,%GG4 与侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌相关。侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌是前列腺切除术后 BCR 的独立参数,而%GG4 不是。侵袭性筛状和/或导管内癌的存在必须在病理报告中报告,并应作为主动监测的排除标准。

相似文献

1
Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.在活检中存在浸润性筛状或管内生长的情况下,预测 Gleason 评分 3+4=7 前列腺癌的结果优于 4 级百分比。
Mod Pathol. 2017 Aug;30(8):1126-1132. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.29. Epub 2017 May 19.
2
Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma.活检Gleason评分为6分和7分且无筛状或导管内癌的男性前列腺癌预后
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Oct;66:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
3
Improved Prostate Cancer Biopsy Grading by Incorporation of Invasive Cribriform and Intraductal Carcinoma in the 2014 Grade Groups.2014 年分级系统中纳入浸润性筛状和导管内癌可改善前列腺癌活检分级。
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.07.051. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer at diagnostic biopsy.诊断性活检时浸润性筛状和导管内前列腺癌患者的疾病特异性生存率。
Mod Pathol. 2016 Jun;29(6):630-6. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.49. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
5
Impact of Cribriform Pattern and Intraductal Carcinoma on Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy.筛状模式和导管内癌对接受外照射放疗的 Gleason7 前列腺癌的影响。
J Urol. 2019 Oct;202(4):710-716. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000316. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
6
Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy.纳入模式 4/5(IQ-Gleason)和筛状结构(cGrade)比例的前列腺癌分级系统的替代方案,可改善前列腺根治性切除术治疗后的预后预测。
Virchows Arch. 2022 Jun;480(6):1149-1157. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03301-y. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.筛状生长对 Gleason 评分 7 级前列腺癌的术后转移和疾病特异性死亡具有高度预测性。
Mod Pathol. 2015 Mar;28(3):457-64. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.116. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
8
Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis.大筛状生长模式可识别出 ISUP 分级 2 级前列腺癌,其具有高复发和转移风险。
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jan;32(1):139-146. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0157-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
9
Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.当代前列腺癌 Gleason 模式 4 的百分比和结构类型对根治性前列腺切除术预后的意义。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Oct;40(10):1400-6. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000691.
10
Intraductal Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate With Cribriform or Papillary Ductal Morphology: Rare Biopsy Cases Lacking Associated Invasive High-grade Carcinoma.前列腺导管内腺癌伴筛状或乳头状管状形态:罕见的活检病例缺乏相关的浸润性高级别癌。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2022 Feb 1;46(2):233-240. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001819.

引用本文的文献

1
Morphologic and clinical spectrum of large gland lesions of the prostate.前列腺大腺病变的形态学和临床谱
Pathologie (Heidelb). 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s00292-025-01454-6.
2
[Morphologic and clinical spectrum of large gland lesions of the prostate. German version].[前列腺大腺病变的形态学和临床谱。德文版]
Pathologie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep;46(5):274-284. doi: 10.1007/s00292-025-01453-7. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
3
Current practices in prostate pathology reporting: results from a survey of genitourinary and general pathologists.

本文引用的文献

1
Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.在预测活检中出现格里森模式 4 的患者的器官局限型前列腺癌方面的局限性:对主动监测的影响。
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.076. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
2
Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下活检检测到的Gleason 4级形态在预测Gleason评分3 + 4 = 7的前列腺癌升级或分期升高方面的效用
Virchows Arch. 2016 Sep;469(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-1981-2. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
3
前列腺病理报告的当前实践:泌尿生殖系统和普通病理学家的调查结果
Histopathology. 2025 Aug;87(2):206-222. doi: 10.1111/his.15469. Epub 2025 May 13.
4
Histopathological evaluation and grading for prostate cancer: current issues and crucial aspects.前列腺癌的组织病理学评估和分级:当前的问题和关键方面。
Asian J Androl. 2024 Nov 1;26(6):575-581. doi: 10.4103/aja202440. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
5
Proposal for an optimised definition of adverse pathology (unfavourable histology) that predicts metastatic risk in prostatic adenocarcinoma independent of grade group and pathological stage.前列腺腺癌中,预测转移风险的不良病理学(不利组织学)的优化定义建议,与分级分组和病理分期无关。
Histopathology. 2024 Oct;85(4):598-613. doi: 10.1111/his.15231. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
6
Active surveillance should be considered for select men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer.对于特定的前列腺癌 2 级分组的男性,可以考虑主动监测。
BMC Urol. 2023 Sep 30;23(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01314-6.
7
The highest percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 is a predictor in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Gleason 4级所占的最高比例是中危前列腺癌的一个预测指标。
BJUI Compass. 2022 Oct 17;4(2):234-240. doi: 10.1002/bco2.195. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.无筛状结构模式的活检分级分组 2 前列腺癌患者中,格里森模式 4 百分比和 PI-RADS 评分可预测升级。
World J Urol. 2022 Nov;40(11):2723-2729. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04161-6. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
WHO Classification of Tumours fifth edition: evolving issues in the classification, diagnosis, and prognostication of prostate cancer.《世界卫生组织肿瘤分类第五版:前列腺癌分类、诊断和预后的演进问题》
Histopathology. 2022 Oct;81(4):447-458. doi: 10.1111/his.14711. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
10
AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival.用于前列腺活检的人工智能模型可预测癌症生存率。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 20;12(5):1031. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051031.
Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
当代前列腺癌 Gleason 模式 4 的百分比和结构类型对根治性前列腺切除术预后的意义。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Oct;40(10):1400-6. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000691.
4
Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among genitourinary pathologists.Gleason 4级前列腺腺癌模式:泌尿生殖病理学家之间的观察者间一致性研究
Histopathology. 2016 Sep;69(3):441-9. doi: 10.1111/his.12976. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours.《2016 年世界卫生组织泌尿系统及男性生殖器官肿瘤分类-第 B 部分:前列腺和膀胱肿瘤》。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
6
Disease-specific survival of patients with invasive cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer at diagnostic biopsy.诊断性活检时浸润性筛状和导管内前列腺癌患者的疾病特异性生存率。
Mod Pathol. 2016 Jun;29(6):630-6. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.49. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
7
Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence.前列腺穿刺活检中格里森评分 4 级比例对预测前列腺切除术病理和复发的预后价值。
J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.120. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
8
Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement.主动监测在局限性前列腺癌管理中的应用(安大略癌症护理指南):美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南的认可。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2182-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7759. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
9
Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.男性初始接受主动监测治疗的转移性前列腺癌。
J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1409-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.075. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
10
Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens.前列腺活检和前列腺切除标本中 Gleason 分级定量的临床应用
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):592-598. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.029. Epub 2015 Nov 2.