Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenapura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenapura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2022 Jun;44(3):504-509. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13824. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
Morphology is still the cornerstone of the diagnosis of haematological malignancies where the quality of staining plays a major role. The hypercellularity of a smear interferes with the quality of staining. We compared a newly modified giemsa stain (MGS) as a routine method for staining hypercellular bone marrow smears over the conventional Leishman method and the May Grunwald Giemsa method (MGG) in a completely randomized block study.
Quality of staining, cost, labour intensiveness and turnaround time of the new method was compared with MGG and Leishman methods for bone marrow smears of acute leukaemia using 30 cases. Bone marrow smears were blindly reviewed for the degree of staining of nuclei, cytoplasm and granules on a scale of 0 to 4 and statistically analysed by Minitab 16.
A significant difference (p < .05) was revealed for the quality of staining of nuclei, cytoplasm and granules, and it was found that the new MGS was superior to the MGG and Leishman method. The cost of staining was lowest in the new MGS and the staining time of the new MGS was 76% less than MGG and 9.09% greater than the Leishman method. In terms of turnaround time, the new MGS is somewhat similar to the Leishman method and is user-friendly with a lesser number of steps to follow, compared with MGG.
Our study showed that the new MGS is overall far superior, cost-effective and user-friendly compared with other conventional staining methods when used for hypercellular bone marrows.
形态学仍然是血液恶性肿瘤诊断的基石,其中染色质量起着重要作用。涂片的细胞过多会干扰染色质量。我们在完全随机分组研究中比较了一种新改良的吉姆萨染色(MGS)作为常规方法,用于染色细胞过多的骨髓涂片,与传统的利什曼染色法和迈-格卢姆氏吉姆萨染色法(MGG)相比。
使用 30 例急性白血病骨髓涂片,比较新方法与 MGG 和利什曼染色法的染色质量、成本、劳动强度和周转时间。对细胞核、细胞质和颗粒的染色程度进行盲法评分,范围为 0 至 4,并使用 Minitab 16 进行统计学分析。
细胞核、细胞质和颗粒的染色质量有显著差异(p<0.05),新的 MGS 明显优于 MGG 和利什曼染色法。新 MGS 的染色成本最低,染色时间比 MGG 缩短 76%,比利什曼染色法长 9.09%。在周转时间方面,新 MGS 与利什曼染色法有些相似,与 MGG 相比,步骤较少,使用方便。
我们的研究表明,与其他常规染色方法相比,新的 MGS 在用于细胞过多的骨髓时,总体上具有优越的染色质量、成本效益和易用性。