• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影像引导下消融术与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗 T1 期肾细胞癌的长期疗效。

Long-term outcomes of image-guided ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK.

Department of Urology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):5811-5820. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08719-1. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-022-08719-1
PMID:35384457
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9381474/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term outcomes and peri-operative outcomes of image-guided ablation (IGA) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of localised RCC (T1a/bN0M0) patients undergoing cryoablation (CRYO), radio-frequency ablation (RFA), or LPN at our institution from 2003 to 2016. Oncological outcomes were compared using Cox regression and log-rank analysis. eGFR changes were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 296 (238 T1a, 58 T1b) consecutive patients were identified; 103, 100, and 93 patients underwent CRYO, RFA, and LPN, respectively. Median follow-up time was 75, 98, and 71 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, all oncological outcomes were comparable amongst CRYO, RFA, and LPN (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, T1a patients undergoing RFA had improved local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (HR 0.002, 95% CI 0.00-0.11, p = 0.003) and metastasis-free survival (HR 0.002, 95% CI 0.00-0.52, p = 0.029) compared to LPN. In T1a and T1b patients combined, both CRYO (HR 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.73, p = 0.026) and RFA (HR 0.04, 95% CI 0.03-0.48, p = 0.011) had improved LRFS rates. Patients undergoing CRYO and RFA had a significantly smaller median decrease in eGFR post-operatively compared to LPN (T1a: p < 0.001; T1b: p = 0.047). Limitations include retrospective design and limited statistical power.

CONCLUSIONS

IGA is potentially as good as LPN in oncological durability. IGA preserves kidney function significantly better than LPN. More studies with larger sample size should be performed to establish IGA as a first-line treatment alongside LPN.

KEY POINTS

• Ablative therapies are alternatives to partial nephrectomy for managing small renal cell carcinomas. • This study reports long-term outcomes of image-guided ablation versus partial nephrectomy. • Ablative therapies have comparable oncological durability and better renal function preservation compared to partial nephrectomy.

摘要

目的

比较影像引导消融(IGA)与腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)的长期疗效和围手术期疗效。

材料与方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究,纳入了于 2003 年至 2016 年在我院接受冷冻消融(CRYO)、射频消融(RFA)或 LPN 治疗的局限性 RCC(T1a/bN0M0)患者。采用 Cox 回归和对数秩分析比较肿瘤学结果。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Wilcoxon 秩检验比较 eGFR 变化。

结果

共纳入 296 例(238 例 T1a,58 例 T1b)连续患者;103、100 和 93 例患者分别接受了 CRYO、RFA 和 LPN 治疗。中位随访时间分别为 75、98 和 71 个月。单因素分析显示,CRYO、RFA 和 LPN 之间的所有肿瘤学结果均无显著差异(p>0.05)。多因素分析显示,RFA 治疗的 T1a 患者局部无复发生存率(LRFS)(HR 0.002,95%CI 0.00-0.11,p=0.003)和无转移生存率(HR 0.002,95%CI 0.00-0.52,p=0.029)优于 LPN。在 T1a 和 T1b 患者中,CRYO(HR 0.07,95%CI 0.01-0.73,p=0.026)和 RFA(HR 0.04,95%CI 0.03-0.48,p=0.011)的 LRFS 率均有所提高。与 LPN 相比,接受 CRYO 和 RFA 治疗的患者术后 eGFR 中位数下降幅度明显较小(T1a:p<0.001;T1b:p=0.047)。局限性包括回顾性设计和有限的统计能力。

结论

IGA 在肿瘤学耐久性方面可能与 LPN 一样好。IGA 显著优于 LPN 保留肾功能。应进行更多具有更大样本量的研究,以确立 IGA 作为与 LPN 并列的一线治疗方法。

关键点

•消融疗法是治疗小肾癌的部分肾切除术的替代方法。•本研究报告了影像引导消融与部分肾切除术的长期疗效。•与部分肾切除术相比,消融疗法具有相似的肿瘤学耐久性和更好的肾功能保留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dcb/9381474/09e6b239b106/330_2022_8719_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dcb/9381474/5bb28da50f43/330_2022_8719_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dcb/9381474/536ec9068318/330_2022_8719_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dcb/9381474/09e6b239b106/330_2022_8719_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dcb/9381474/5bb28da50f43/330_2022_8719_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dcb/9381474/536ec9068318/330_2022_8719_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dcb/9381474/09e6b239b106/330_2022_8719_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of image-guided ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma.影像引导下消融术与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗 T1 期肾细胞癌的长期疗效。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):5811-5820. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08719-1. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Comparison of survival and renal function between partial and radical laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma.部分腹腔镜与根治性腹腔镜肾切除术治疗 T1b 期肾癌的生存及肾功能比较。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;146(1):261-272. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03058-z. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
Radiofrequency ablation using real-time ultrasonography-computed tomography fusion imaging improves treatment outcomes for T1a renal cell carcinoma: Comparison with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.实时超声计算机断层融合成像引导下射频消融治疗 T1a 期肾癌:与腹腔镜部分肾切除术的比较。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Mar;63(2):159-167. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210389.
4
Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation and Partial Nephrectomy for T1a Renal Masses: A Retrospective Single-center 60 Month Follow-up Cohort Study.腹腔镜射频消融术与部分肾切除术治疗T1a期肾肿瘤的肿瘤学及功能学结局:一项单中心回顾性60个月随访队列研究
Urol J. 2019 Feb 21;16(1):44-49. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4155.
5
Split renal function after treatment of small renal masses: comparison between radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.治疗小肾肿瘤后分肾功能:射频消融与腹腔镜部分肾切除术的比较。
Acta Radiol. 2021 Sep;62(9):1248-1256. doi: 10.1177/0284185120956281. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Periprocedural outcome after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for T1 renal tumors: a modified R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score adjusted comparison.腹腔镜部分肾切除术与射频消融术治疗T1期肾肿瘤的围手术期结局:基于改良R.E.N.A.L肾计量评分的调整比较
Acta Radiol. 2019 Feb;60(2):260-268. doi: 10.1177/0284185118780891. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
7
[THE FACTORS THAT AFFECT THE DECISION TO PERFORM LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR SMALL RENAL TUMOR].[影响对小肾肿瘤实施腹腔镜部分肾切除术决策的因素]
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2016;107(2):73-78. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.107.73.
8
Functional and oncological outcome of percutaneous cryoablation versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal tumors: A propensity score-matched analysis.经皮冷冻消融与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗临床 T1 期肾肿瘤的功能和肿瘤学结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Dec;38(12):938.e1-938.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
9
Radiofrequency ablation versus partial nephrectomy in patients with solitary clinical T1a renal cell carcinoma: comparable oncologic outcomes at a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.射频消融与部分肾切除术治疗单发临床 T1a 期肾细胞癌患者:至少 5 年随访的可比肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
10
Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage.离断与完全阻断控制腹腔镜肾部分切除术:按临床分期比较。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10592.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Microwave ablation versus combined microwave ablation and transarterial chemoembolization for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a Single-Center retrospective study.微波消融与微波消融联合经动脉化疗栓塞治疗T1a期肾细胞癌:一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01858-9.
2
Influence of tumor-associated factors on the treatment selection between partial nephrectomy and ablation therapy for small renal tumors (Review).肿瘤相关因素对小肾癌部分肾切除术与消融治疗选择的影响(综述)
Med Int (Lond). 2025 Jun 4;5(4):48. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.247. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
3
Percutaneous Image-Guided Ablation of Renal Cancer: Traditional and Emerging Indications, Energy Sources, Techniques, and Future Developments.

本文引用的文献

1
Ablative therapies versus partial nephrectomy for small renal masses - A systematic review and meta-analysis.消融疗法与部分肾切除术治疗小肾肿瘤的比较 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2022 Jan;97:106194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106194. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
2
Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Young Patients with Small Renal Masses: Prospective Data from the DISSRM Registry.主动监测对小肾肿块年轻患者的结果:DISSRM 登记处的前瞻性数据。
J Urol. 2021 May;205(5):1286-1293. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001575. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
3
Robot-assisted Radical Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.
经皮影像引导下的肾癌消融:传统与新出现的适应证、能量来源、技术及未来发展
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 28;61(3):438. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030438.
4
Image-guided percutaneous ablative treatments for renal cell carcinoma.影像引导下经皮肾细胞癌消融治疗
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11480-w.
5
Not just a picture of a changing treatment landscape: what registry data from Germany add to our knowledge about thermal ablation for kidney tumors.不仅仅是一幅不断变化的治疗格局图:来自德国的登记数据为我们对肾肿瘤热消融的认识增添了什么。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Sep;35(9):5801-5803. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11415-5. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
6
Risk Factors for Residual Unablated Tumour Following CT-Guided Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation: Lessons from the EuRECA Registry.CT引导下经皮肾冷冻消融术后残留未消融肿瘤的危险因素:来自EuRECA注册研究的经验教训
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Feb;48(2):196-204. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03951-2. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
7
'BJUI Clinical Dilemma': the incidental small renal mass in a solitary kidney.《英国泌尿学杂志》临床困境:孤立肾中的偶然发现的小肾肿块
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):371-379. doi: 10.1111/bju.16627. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
8
Partial nephrectomy versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with cT1a renal cell carcinoma: A surveillance, epidemiology, end results (SEER) analysis.部分肾切除术与射频消融术治疗 cT1a 期肾细胞癌患者的比较:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 29;103(48):e40721. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040721.
9
Image-Guided Ablation of Renal Masses: Challenges to Produce High-Quality Evidence and Future Directions.图像引导下肾肿块消融:生成高质量证据面临的挑战及未来方向
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024 Jul 10;41(2):144-153. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787163. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Percutaneous Ablation of T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Overview.经皮消融治疗 T1b 期肾细胞癌:概述。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Jul;26(7):754-761. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01531-8. Epub 2024 May 20.
机器人辅助根治性肾切除术:比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2021 Oct;80(4):428-439. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.10.034. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Limitations of Available Studies Prevent Reliable Comparison Between Tumour Ablation and Partial Nephrectomy for Patients with Localised Renal Masses: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Renal Cell Cancer Guideline Panel.局限性:现有研究限制了对局部肾肿块患者肿瘤消融术与部分肾切除术的可靠比较:来自欧洲泌尿外科学会肾癌指南小组的系统评价。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Aug;3(4):433-452. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.02.001. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
5
Long-Term Survival after Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Pathologically Proven Renal Cell Carcinoma in 100 Patients.100 例经病理证实的肾细胞癌患者行经皮射频消融治疗后的长期生存。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Jan;31(1):15-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.011. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
6
Oncologic Outcomes Following Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses.cT1 期肾肿瘤行部分肾切除术与经皮消融术后的肿瘤学结局。
Eur Urol. 2019 Aug;76(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 May 3.
7
Introduction of Microwave Ablation Into a Renal Ablation Practice: Valuable Lessons Learned.微波消融在肾消融实践中的应用:宝贵经验教训。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Dec;211(6):1381-1389. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19775. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Surveillance versus ablation for incidentally diagnosed small renal tumours: the SURAB feasibility RCT.偶发小肾肿瘤的监测与消融治疗:SURAB 可行性 RCT
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Dec;21(81):1-68. doi: 10.3310/hta21810.
9
Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline.肾脏肿块和局限性肾细胞癌:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):520-529. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Renal Tumor Biopsy for Small Renal Masses: A Single-center 13-year Experience.肾脏肿瘤活检用于小肾肿块:单中心 13 年经验。
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1007-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 18.