Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical Schoolgrid.471406.0, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
West African Centre for Cell Biology of Infectious Pathogens (WACCBIP), University of Ghana, Legon, Greater Accra Region, Ghana.
mBio. 2022 Apr 26;13(2):e0374821. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03748-21. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
Integration site landscapes, clonal dynamics, and latency reversal with or without were compared in HIV-1-infected Jurkat cell populations, and the properties of individual clones were defined. Clones differed in fractions of long terminal repeat (LTR)-active daughter cells, with some clones containing few to no LTR-active cells, while almost all cells were LTR active for others. Clones varied over 4 orders of magnitude in virus release per active cell. Proviruses in largely LTR-active clones were closer to preexisting enhancers and promoters than low-LTR-active clones. Unsurprisingly, major clones contained fewer LTR-active cells than clones, and predominant proviruses were farther from enhancers and promoters than those in pools. Distances to these marks among intact proviruses previously reported for antiretroviral therapy (ART)-suppressed patients revealed that patient integration sites were more similar to those in the pool than to integrants. Complementing -defective proviruses with led to the rapid loss of highly LTR-active clones, indicating that the effect of Vpr on proviral populations occurred after integration. However, major clones in the complemented pool and its parent population did not differ in burst sizes. When the latency reactivation agents prostratin and JQ1 were applied separately or in combination, and population-wide trends were similar, with dual-treatment enhancement being due in part to reactivated clones that did not respond to either drug applied separately. However, the expression signatures of individual clones differed between populations. These observations highlight how Vpr, exerting selective pressure on proviral epigenetic variation, can shape integration site landscapes, proviral expression patterns, and reactivation properties. A bedrock assumption in HIV-1 population modeling is that all active cells release the same amount of virus. However, the findings here revealed that when HIV-infected cells expand into clones, each clone differs in virus production. Reasoning that this variation in expression patterns constituted a population of clones from which differing subsets would prevail under differing environmental conditions, the cytotoxic HIV-1 protein Vpr was introduced, and population dynamics and expression properties were compared in the presence and absence of Vpr. The results showed that whereas most clones produced fairly continuous levels of virus in the absence of Vpr, its presence selected for a distinct subset of clones with properties reminiscent of persistent populations in patients, suggesting the possibility that the interclonal variation in expression patterns observed in culture may contribute to proviral persistence .
在感染 HIV-1 的 Jurkat 细胞群体中比较了整合位点景观、克隆动态和潜伏逆转,以及是否存在 Vpr,定义了单个克隆的特性。克隆在长末端重复 (LTR)-活性子细胞的分数上存在差异,一些克隆几乎没有 LTR-活性细胞,而其他克隆几乎所有细胞都是 LTR 活性的。克隆在每个活性细胞释放的病毒量上差异超过 4 个数量级。在主要的 LTR-活性克隆中,前病毒与现有增强子和启动子的距离比低 LTR-活性克隆更近。毫不奇怪,主要的 克隆比 克隆包含更少的 LTR-活性细胞,而主要的 前病毒与增强子和启动子的距离比 池中的前病毒更远。先前在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗 (ART)的患者中报道的完整前病毒与这些标记物之间的距离表明,患者的整合位点与 池中的整合位点更相似,而不是与 整合体相似。用 补充 -缺陷型前病毒会导致高度 LTR-活性克隆迅速丢失,表明 Vpr 对前病毒群体的影响发生在整合之后。然而,补充池及其亲本群体中的主要克隆在爆发大小上没有差异。当单独或联合应用潜伏再激活剂 prostratin 和 JQ1 时, 和 群体趋势相似,双重治疗增强部分是由于对单独应用的两种药物都没有反应的再激活克隆。然而,个体克隆的表达特征在不同群体之间存在差异。这些观察结果强调了 Vpr 如何通过对前病毒表观遗传变异施加选择性压力,从而塑造整合位点景观、前病毒表达模式和再激活特性。在 HIV-1 群体建模中,一个基本假设是所有活跃细胞释放相同数量的病毒。然而,这里的发现表明,当 HIV 感染的细胞扩展成克隆时,每个克隆在病毒产生方面存在差异。考虑到这种表达模式的变化构成了一个由不同亚群组成的克隆群体,这些亚群在不同的环境条件下会占主导地位,引入了具有细胞毒性的 HIV-1 蛋白 Vpr,并在存在和不存在 Vpr 的情况下比较了种群动态和表达特性。结果表明,虽然在没有 Vpr 的情况下,大多数克隆产生相当连续水平的病毒,但它的存在选择了具有类似于患者中持续性群体特征的独特亚群,这表明在培养中观察到的表达模式的亚群间变化可能有助于前病毒的持续性。