Department of Statistics, Tamkang University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Sociology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0265673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265673. eCollection 2022.
Research on the novel coronavirus diseases 2019 (COVID-19) mainly relies on cross-sectional data, but this approach fails to consider the temporal dimension of the pandemic. This study assesses three temporal dimensions of the COVID-19 infection risk in US counties, namely probability of occurrence, duration of the pandemic, and intensity of transmission, and investigate local patterns of the factors associated with these risks.
Analyzing daily data between January 22 and September 11, 2020, we categorize the contiguous US counties into four risk groups-High-Risk, Moderate-Risk, Mild-Risk, and Low-Risk-and then apply both conventional (i.e., non-spatial) and geographically weighted (i.e., spatial) ordinal logistic regression model to understand the county-level factors raising the COVID-19 infection risk. The comparisons of various model fit diagnostics indicate that the spatial models better capture the associations between COVID-19 risk and other factors.
The key findings include (1) High- and Moderate-Risk counties are clustered in the Black Belt, the coastal areas, and Great Lakes regions. (2) Fragile labor markets (e.g., high percentages of unemployed and essential workers) and high housing inequality are associated with higher risks. (3) The Monte Carlo tests suggest that the associations between covariates and COVID-19 risk are spatially non-stationary. For example, counties in the northeastern region and Mississippi Valley experience a stronger impact of essential workers on COVID-19 risk than those in other regions, whereas the association between income ratio and COVID-19 risk is stronger in Texas and Louisiana.
The COVID-19 infection risk levels differ greatly across the US and their associations with structural inequality and sociodemographic composition are spatially non-stationary, suggesting that the same stimulus may not lead to the same change in COVID-19 risk. Potential interventions to lower COVID-19 risk should adopt a place-based perspective.
针对 2019 年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的研究主要依赖于横断面数据,但这种方法未能考虑到疫情的时间维度。本研究评估了美国县 COVID-19 感染风险的三个时间维度,即发生概率、疫情持续时间和传播强度,并调查了与这些风险相关的局部模式。
我们在 2020 年 1 月 22 日至 9 月 11 日期间分析了每日数据,将美国连续县分为高风险、中风险、低风险和低风险四个风险组,然后应用常规(即非空间)和地理加权(即空间)有序逻辑回归模型来了解提高 COVID-19 感染风险的县一级因素。各种模型拟合诊断的比较表明,空间模型更好地捕捉了 COVID-19 风险与其他因素之间的关联。
主要发现包括:(1)高风险和中风险县集中在黑带、沿海地区和五大湖地区。(2)脆弱的劳动力市场(例如,高比例的失业和必要工人)和高住房不平等与更高的风险相关。(3)蒙特卡罗检验表明,协变量与 COVID-19 风险之间的关联是空间非平稳的。例如,与其他地区相比,东北部地区和密西西比河谷地区的必要工人对 COVID-19 风险的影响更大,而收入比与 COVID-19 风险之间的关联在德克萨斯州和路易斯安那州更强。
美国各地的 COVID-19 感染风险水平差异很大,它们与结构性不平等和社会人口构成的关联是空间非平稳的,这表明相同的刺激可能不会导致 COVID-19 风险的相同变化。降低 COVID-19 风险的潜在干预措施应采取基于地点的视角。