• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Combat injury profiles among U.S. military personnel who survived serious wounds in Iraq and Afghanistan: A latent class analysis.美军在伊拉克和阿富汗战场上幸存下来的严重伤员的战斗伤害特征:潜在类别分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0266588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266588. eCollection 2022.
2
Combat wounds in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2005 to 2009.2005 年至 2009 年在伊拉克和阿富汗的战斗伤口。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jul;73(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318250bfb4.
3
The nature and extent of war injuries sustained by combat specialty personnel killed and wounded in Afghanistan and Iraq, 2003-2011.2003-2011 年,阿富汗和伊拉克作战伤亡人员的战伤性质和程度。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Aug;75(2):287-91. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829a0970.
4
Spinal injuries in United States military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: an epidemiological investigation involving 7877 combat casualties from 2005 to 2009.美国派驻伊拉克和阿富汗的军事人员的脊髓损伤:2005 年至 2009 年涉及 7877 名战斗伤员的流行病学调查。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 15;38(20):1770-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ef226.
5
Comparison of female and male casualty cohorts from conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.伊拉克和阿富汗冲突中女性与男性伤亡群体的比较。
US Army Med Dep J. 2015 Apr-Jun:80-5.
6
Characterization of Humanitarian Trauma Care by US Military Facilities During Combat Operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.在阿富汗和伊拉克的作战行动中,美国军事设施对人道主义创伤护理的描述。
Ann Surg. 2022 Oct 1;276(4):732-742. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005592. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
7
Use of Combat Casualty Care Data to Assess the US Military Trauma System During the Afghanistan and Iraq Conflicts, 2001-2017.利用作战伤员救治数据评估 2001-2017 年阿富汗和伊拉克冲突期间的美军创伤救治体系。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):600-608. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0151.
8
Exploring Nonbattle Injury in the Deployed Military Environment Using the Department of Defense Trauma Registry.利用国防部创伤登记处探索部署环境中的非战斗伤。
Mil Med. 2020 Aug 14;185(7-8):e1073-e1076. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz481.
9
Trajectory of self-rated health after combat-related injury.与战斗相关损伤后的自评健康轨迹。
Injury. 2021 Jul;52(7):1721-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Pelvic, spinal and extremity wounds among combat-specific personnel serving in Iraq and Afghanistan (2003-2011): A new paradigm in military musculoskeletal medicine.2003年至2011年在伊拉克和阿富汗服役的特定作战人员中的骨盆、脊柱和四肢创伤:军事肌肉骨骼医学的新范例
Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1866-70. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Investing in the Advanced Practice Nursing Workforce to Improve Health System Responses to Armed Conflict.投资高级实践护理人员队伍以改善卫生系统对武装冲突的应对。
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70074. doi: 10.1111/inr.70074.
2
Evaluation of the effects of explosions: A ten-year retrospective study.爆炸影响的评估:一项十年回顾性研究。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Mar;31(3):233-241. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.40088.
3
Pain after combat injury in male UK military personnel deployed to Afghanistan.男性英国军人在阿富汗部署后的战斗伤害后疼痛。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Jun;132(6):1285-1292. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.019. Epub 2024 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Symptom profiles following combat injury and long-term quality of life: a latent class analysis.战斗伤害后症状谱与长期生活质量:潜类别分析。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Sep;30(9):2531-2540. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02836-y. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
2
Characteristics and Impact of U.S. Military Blast-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.美国军事爆炸相关轻度创伤性脑损伤的特征与影响:一项系统综述
Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 2;11:559318. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.559318. eCollection 2020.
3
Comprehensive analysis of combat casualty outcomes in US service members from the beginning of World War II to the end of Operation Enduring Freedom.对从第二次世界大战开始到持久自由行动结束期间美国军人战斗伤亡结果的综合分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Aug;89(2S Suppl 2):S8-S15. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002789.
4
Multimorbidity and quality of life after blast-related injury among US military personnel: a cluster analysis of retrospective data.爆炸相关损伤后美国军人的多种疾病和生活质量:回顾性数据分析的聚类分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08696-4.
5
Anatomic injury patterns in combat casualties treated by forward surgical teams.战伤外科救治组救治的战斗伤员的解剖损伤模式。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Aug;89(2S Suppl 2):S231-S236. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002720.
6
Patterns of Anatomic Injury in Critically Injured Combat Casualties: A Network Analysis.严重创伤战伤伤员的解剖损伤模式:网络分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 24;9(1):13767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50272-3.
7
Use of Combat Casualty Care Data to Assess the US Military Trauma System During the Afghanistan and Iraq Conflicts, 2001-2017.利用作战伤员救治数据评估 2001-2017 年阿富汗和伊拉克冲突期间的美军创伤救治体系。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):600-608. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0151.
8
High Bilateral Amputations and Dismounted Complex Blast Injury (DCBI).双侧高位截肢与下车复杂爆炸伤(DCBI)
Mil Med. 2018 Sep 1;183(suppl_2):118-122. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy082.
9
A Review of Casualties Transported to Role 2 Medical Treatment Facilities in Afghanistan.阿富汗境内转运至二级医疗设施的伤亡人员情况综述。
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):134-145. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx211.
10
Evaluation of Environmental Sensors During Laboratory Direct and Indirect Head Exposures.实验室直接和间接头部暴露期间环境传感器的评估
Mil Med. 2018 Mar 1;183(suppl_1):294-302. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usx208.

美军在伊拉克和阿富汗战场上幸存下来的严重伤员的战斗伤害特征:潜在类别分析。

Combat injury profiles among U.S. military personnel who survived serious wounds in Iraq and Afghanistan: A latent class analysis.

机构信息

Medical Modeling, Simulation, and Mission Support Department, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Leidos, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0266588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266588. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0266588
PMID:35385552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8985965/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The U.S. military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan had the most casualties since Vietnam with more than 53,000 wounded in action. Novel injury mechanisms, such as improvised explosive devices, and higher rates of survivability compared with previous wars led to a new pattern of combat injuries. The purpose of the present study was to use latent class analysis (LCA) to identify combat injury profiles among U.S. military personnel who survived serious wounds.

METHODS

A total of 5,227 combat casualty events with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 9 or greater that occurred in Iraq and Afghanistan from December 2002 to July 2019 were identified from the Expeditionary Medical Encounter Database for analysis. The Barell Injury Diagnosis Matrix was used to classify injuries into binary variables by site and type of injury. LCA was employed to identify injury profiles that accounted for co-occurring injuries. Injury profiles were described and compared by demographic, operational, and injury-specific variables.

RESULTS

Seven injury profiles were identified and defined as: (1) open wounds (18.8%), (2) Type 1 traumatic brain injury (TBI)/facial injuries (14.2%), (3) disseminated injuries (6.8%), (4) Type 2 TBI (15.4%), (5) lower extremity injuries (19.8%), (6) burns (7.4%), and (7) chest and/or abdominal injuries (17.7%). Profiles differed by service branch, combat location, year of injury, injury mechanism, combat posture at the time of injury, and ISS.

CONCLUSION

LCA identified seven distinct and interpretable injury profiles among U.S. military personnel who survived serious combat injuries in Iraq or Afghanistan. These findings may be of interest to military medical planners as resource needs are evaluated and projected for future conflicts, and medical professionals involved in the rehabilitation of wounded service members.

摘要

背景

自越南战争以来,美国在伊拉克和阿富汗的军事冲突中伤亡人数最多,有超过 53000 人在战斗中受伤。新颖的伤害机制,如简易爆炸装置,以及与以往战争相比更高的存活率,导致了一种新的战斗伤害模式。本研究的目的是使用潜在类别分析(LCA)来识别在严重伤口中幸存下来的美国军事人员的战斗伤害情况。

方法

从 2002 年 12 月至 2019 年 7 月,在伊拉克和阿富汗发生的 5227 起伤害严重程度评分(ISS)为 9 或更高的战斗伤亡事件,从远征医疗遭遇数据库中确定用于分析。使用 Barell 伤害诊断矩阵,通过部位和伤害类型将伤害分类为二进制变量。采用潜在类别分析(LCA)识别可解释共同发生伤害的伤害情况。描述并比较伤害情况,包括人口统计学、操作和伤害特异性变量。

结果

确定了七种伤害情况,分别为:(1)开放性伤口(18.8%)、(2)1 型创伤性脑损伤(TBI)/面部损伤(14.2%)、(3)弥散性损伤(6.8%)、(4)2 型 TBI(15.4%)、(5)下肢损伤(19.8%)、(6)烧伤(7.4%)和(7)胸部和/或腹部损伤(17.7%)。不同的伤害情况与兵种、战斗地点、受伤年份、伤害机制、受伤时的战斗姿势和 ISS 有关。

结论

LCA 在在伊拉克或阿富汗幸存严重战斗伤害的美国军人中确定了七种不同且可解释的伤害情况。这些发现可能会引起军事医疗规划者的兴趣,因为需要评估和预测未来冲突的资源需求,以及参与受伤服务成员康复的医疗专业人员。