• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新提出的重新排列目标能否弥合成年人颈椎畸形矫正手术中影像学成功与临床成功之间的差距?

Do the newly proposed realignment targets bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in adult cervical deformity corrective surgery.

作者信息

Pierce Katherine E, Krol Oscar, Lebovic Jordan, Kummer Nicholas, Passfall Lara, Ahmad Waleed, Naessig Sara, Diebo Bassel, Passias Peter Gust

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Department of Orthopedics, SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):67-71. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_67_21. Epub 2022 Mar 9.

DOI:10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_67_21
PMID:35386239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8978849/
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

The myelopathy-based cervical deformity (CD) thresholds will associate with patient-reported outcomes and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study include CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb > 10°, CL > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, or CBVA > 25°) with BL and 1-year (1Y) data. Modifiers assessed low (L), moderate (M), and severe (S) deformity: CL (L: >3°; M:-21° to 3°; S: <‒21°), TS-CL (L: <26°; M: 26° to 45°; S: >45°), C2-T3 angle (L: >‒25°; M:-35° to-25°; S: <‒35°), C2 slope (L: <33°; M: 33° to 49°; S: >49°), MGS (L: >‒9° and < 0°; M: ‒12° to ‒9° or 0° to 19°; S: < ‒12° or > 19°), and frailty (L: <0.18; M: 0.18-0.27, S: >0.27). Means comparison and ANOVA assessed outcomes in the severity groups at BL at 1Y. Correlations found between modifiers assessed the internal relationship.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients were included in the study (57.1 years, 50%, 29.3 kg/m). Baseline S TS-CL, C2-T3, and C2S modifiers were associated with increased reoperations ( < 0.01), while S MGS, CL, and C2-T3 had increased estimated blood lost (>1000ccs, < 0.001). S MGS and C2-T3 had more postop DJK (60%, = 0.018). Improvement in TS-CL, C2S, C2-T3, and CL patients had better numeric rating scale (NRS) back (<5) and EuroQOL 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ5D) at 1 year ( < 0.05). Improving the modifiers correlated strongly with each other (0.213-0.785, < 0.001). Worsened TS-CL had increased NRS back scores at 1 year (9, = 0.042). Worsened CL had increased 1-year modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) (7, = 0.001). Worsened C2-T3 had worse NRS neck scores at 1 year ( = 0.048). Improvement in all six modifiers (8.7%) had significantly better health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores at follow-up (EQ5D, NRS, and Neck Disability Index).

CONCLUSIONS

Newly proposed CD modifiers based on mJOA were closely associated with outcomes. Improvement and deterioration in the modifiers significantly impacted the HRQL.

摘要

假设

基于脊髓病的颈椎畸形(CD)阈值将与患者报告的结局及并发症相关。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了具有基线(BL)和1年(1Y)数据的CD患者(C2 - C7 Cobb角>10°、颈椎后凸(CL)>10°、颈椎矢状垂直轴>4 cm或颈椎侧方偏移(CBVA)>25°)。修正因素评估了轻度(L)、中度(M)和重度(S)畸形:CL(L:>3°;M:-21°至3°;S:<-21°)、胸7 - 颈椎后凸(TS - CL)(L:<26°;M:26°至45°;S:>45°)、C2 - T3角(L:>-25°;M:-35°至-25°;S:<-35°)、C2斜率(L:<33°;M:33°至49°;S:>49°)、颈椎矢状面平均坡度(MGS)(L:>-9°且<0°;M:-12°至-9°或0°至19°;S:<-12°或>19°)以及虚弱程度(L:<0.18;M:0.18 - 0.27;S:>0.27)。均值比较和方差分析评估了各严重程度组在基线和1年时的结局。通过评估修正因素之间的相关性来发现内在关系。

结果

本研究共纳入104例患者(年龄57.1岁,50%为女性,体重指数29.3 kg/m²)。基线时重度TS - CL(胸7 - 颈椎后凸)、C2 - T3和C2斜率修正因素与再次手术增加相关(P<0.01),而重度MGS(颈椎矢状面平均坡度)、CL(颈椎后凸)和C2 - T3的估计失血量增加(>1000cc,P<0.001)。重度MGS和C2 - T3术后出现更多的相邻节段退变(DJK)(60%,P = 0.018)。TS - CL、C2斜率、C2 - T3和CL改善的患者在1年时数字评定量表(NRS)背痛评分(<5)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ5D)更好(P<0.05)。各修正因素之间的改善情况相关性很强(r = 0.213 - 0.785,P<0.001)。TS - CL恶化的患者在1年时NRS背痛评分增加(P = 0.042)。CL恶化的患者1年时改良日本骨科协会(mJOA)评分增加(P = 0.001)。C2 - T3恶化的患者在1年时NRS颈部评分更差(P = 0.048)。所有六个修正因素均有改善的患者(8.7%)在随访时健康相关生活质量(HRQL)评分(EQ5D、NRS和颈部残疾指数)显著更好。

结论

新提出的基于改良日本骨科协会(mJOA)的CD修正因素与结局密切相关。修正因素的改善和恶化对健康相关生活质量有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Do the newly proposed realignment targets bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in adult cervical deformity corrective surgery.新提出的重新排列目标能否弥合成年人颈椎畸形矫正手术中影像学成功与临床成功之间的差距?
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):67-71. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_67_21. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?成人颈椎畸形矫正手术中,新提出的C2和T1斜率重新排列目标能否弥合影像学成功与临床成功之间的差距?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 Apr 15;37(3):368-375. doi: 10.3171/2022.2.SPINE211576. Print 2022 Sep 1.
3
Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery.颈椎和脊柱骨盆参数可预测颈椎畸形手术后患者报告的结果。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):62-66. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_104_21. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
The Importance of C2 Slope, a Singular Marker of Cervical Deformity, Correlates With Patient-reported Outcomes.C2 斜率的重要性,颈椎畸形的奇异标志物,与患者报告的结果相关。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Feb 1;45(3):184-192. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003214.
5
Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients.为颈椎畸形手术患者确定与卓越临床结果相关的重新排列优先级。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):311-317. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_26_21. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?颈椎畸形手术结果的主要驱动因素有哪些?
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):401-405. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_106_21. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
7
Magnitude of preoperative cervical lordotic compensation and C2-T3 angle are correlated to increased risk of postoperative sagittal spinal pelvic malalignment in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.在成年胸腰椎畸形患者两年随访中,术前颈椎前凸代偿程度和C2-T3角与术后矢状位脊柱骨盆排列不齐风险增加相关。
Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1756-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
8
Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients.颈椎畸形患者与卓越临床结果相关的重新排列的优先级确定
Neurospine. 2021 Sep;18(3):506-514. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040540.270. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?颈椎畸形手术结果的主要驱动因素有哪些?
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021 Oct-Dec;12(4):376-380. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_117_21. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
10
Predictors of Superior Recovery Kinetics in Adult Cervical Deformity Correction: An Analysis Using a Novel Area Under the Curve Methodology.成人颈椎畸形矫正中恢复动力学的优势预测因素:一种使用新的曲线下面积分析方法。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 May 1;46(9):559-566. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003971.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical Spine Deformity Correction Techniques.颈椎畸形矫正技术
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):470-482. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938288.144. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
2
McGregor's slope and slope of line of sight: two surrogate markers for Chin-Brow vertical angle in the setting of cervical spine pathology.麦戈里格斜率和视线斜率:颈椎病变中 Chin-Brow 垂直角的两个替代标志物。
Spine J. 2019 Sep;19(9):1512-1517. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 May 3.
3
The Relationship Between Improvements in Myelopathy and Sagittal Realignment in Cervical Deformity Surgery Outcomes.颈椎病畸形手术结局中脊髓病改善与矢状面矫正的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Aug;43(16):1117-1124. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002610.
4
Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: Development and Validation of a New Method of Analyzing Spinopelvic Alignment to Predict Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.整体对线与比例(GAP)评分:一种分析脊柱骨盆对线以预测成人脊柱畸形手术后机械并发症的新方法的开发与验证
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Oct 4;99(19):1661-1672. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01594.
5
Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals Have the Potential to Reduce PJK.年龄调整对线目标有可能降低 PJK。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Sep 1;42(17):1275-1282. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002146.
6
Surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a patient-centered quality of life and health economic evaluation.退行性颈椎脊髓病的手术治疗:以患者为中心的生活质量和健康经济评估。
Spine J. 2017 Jan;17(1):15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.015. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
Degenerative cervical myelopathy.退行性颈椎脊髓病
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016 Sep;9(3):263-71. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9348-5.
8
Natural Head Posture in the Setting of Sagittal Spinal Deformity: Validation of Chin-Brow Vertical Angle, Slope of Line of Sight, and McGregor's Slope With Health-Related Quality of Life.矢状面脊柱畸形背景下的自然头位:与健康相关生活质量相关的眉-垂直线角、视线斜率和麦格雷戈斜率的验证
Neurosurgery. 2016 Jul;79(1):108-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001193.
9
Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system.一种新型颈椎畸形分类系统的可靠性评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Dec;23(6):673-83. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14780. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
How the neck affects the back: changes in regional cervical sagittal alignment correlate to HRQOL improvement in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.颈部如何影响背部:颈椎矢状面局部排列变化与成人胸腰椎畸形患者在 2 年随访时 HRQOL 改善相关。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):153-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE1441. Epub 2015 May 15.