Carroll Stephanie Russo, Garba Ibrahim, Plevel Rebecca, Small-Rodriguez Desi, Hiratsuka Vanessa Y, Hudson Maui, Garrison Nanibaa' A
Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Front Genet. 2022 Mar 21;13:823309. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.823309. eCollection 2022.
Biomedical data are now organized in large-scale databases allowing researchers worldwide to access and utilize the data for new projects. As new technologies generate even larger amounts of data, data governance and data management are becoming pressing challenges. The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) were developed to facilitate data sharing. However, the Indigenous Data Sovereignty movement advocates for greater Indigenous control and oversight in order to share data on Indigenous Peoples' terms. This is especially true in the context of genetic research where Indigenous Peoples historically have been unethically exploited in the name of science. This article outlines the relationship between sovereignty and ethics in the context of data to describe the collective rights that Indigenous Peoples assert to increase control over their biomedical data. Then drawing on the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics), we explore how standards already set by Native nations in the United States, such as tribal research codes, provide direction for implementation of the CARE Principles to complement FAIR. A broader approach to policy and procedure regarding tribal participation in biomedical research is required and we make recommendations for tribes, institutions, and ethical practice.
生物医学数据如今被组织在大规模数据库中,使全球的研究人员能够访问并将这些数据用于新项目。随着新技术产生的数据量越来越大,数据治理和数据管理正成为紧迫的挑战。公平原则(可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重用)的制定是为了促进数据共享。然而,原住民数据主权运动主张原住民应加强控制和监督,以便按照原住民的条件共享数据。在基因研究领域尤其如此,历史上原住民在科学的名义下受到了不道德的剥削。本文概述了数据背景下主权与伦理的关系,以描述原住民主张的集体权利,从而加强对其生物医学数据的控制。然后借鉴原住民数据治理的CARE原则(集体利益、控制权、责任和伦理),我们探讨了美国本土民族已经制定的标准,如部落研究规范,如何为实施CARE原则以补充公平原则提供指导。需要一种更广泛的关于部落参与生物医学研究的政策和程序方法,我们为部落、机构和伦理实践提出了建议。