Suppr超能文献

俄克拉荷马州的基因组研究与美洲印第安部落社区:从过去的研究不当行为中吸取教训并建立未来的互信伙伴关系。

Genomic Research and American Indian Tribal Communities in Oklahoma: Learning From Past Research Misconduct and Building Future Trusting Partnerships.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Heath Services Authority, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Durant, Oklahoma.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1206-1212. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz062.

Abstract

Research misconduct and consequential harms have been inflicted upon American Indian/Alaska Native communities for decades. To protect their people and culture and to retain oversight over research, many Native communities have established tribal health research and institutional review boards. The Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) Study showcases a successful, trusting research collaboration with tribal nations and academic investigators in Oklahoma. In 2006, the TODAY Study investigators proposed a modification of the study protocol to collect biological specimens from participants for genomic analyses and indefinite storage. Partnering American Indian tribal nations elected not to participate in the genomics collection and repository proposal. Reasons included 1) protection of cultural values, 2) concerns regarding community anonymity, 3) a potential threat to tribal services eligibility, 4) broad informed consent language, and 5) vague definitions of data access and usage. The nations believed the proposed genomics analyses presented a risk of harm to their people and nations without clear benefit. Since the 2006 proposal and the advancement of genomics research, many tribal communities in Oklahoma, appreciating the potential benefits of genomic research, are developing policies regarding oversight of/access to data and biological specimens to mitigate risks and provide members and communities with opportunities to participate in safe and meaningful genomic research.

摘要

几十年来,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民社区一直受到学术不端行为及其后果的伤害。为了保护他们的人民和文化,并保留对研究的监督,许多原住民社区已经建立了部落健康研究和机构审查委员会。《2 型糖尿病青少年和青年治疗选择(TODAY)研究》展示了与俄克拉荷马州部落民族和学术研究人员成功建立的信任研究合作关系。2006 年,TODAY 研究人员提议修改研究方案,从参与者身上采集生物样本进行基因组分析和无限期储存。合作伙伴美洲印第安部落国家选择不参与基因组收集和储存库提案。原因包括 1)保护文化价值观,2)对社区匿名性的担忧,3)对部落服务资格的潜在威胁,4)广泛的知情同意语言,以及 5)数据访问和使用的定义模糊。这些国家认为,拟议中的基因组分析对他们的人民和国家构成了风险,而没有明确的好处。自 2006 年的提案和基因组学研究的进展以来,俄克拉荷马州的许多部落社区赞赏基因组研究的潜在好处,正在制定关于数据和生物样本监督/访问的政策,以减轻风险,并为成员和社区提供参与安全和有意义的基因组研究的机会。

相似文献

3
Collaborative implementation of a community-based exercise intervention with a partnering rural American Indian community.
Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;16(4):391-398. doi: 10.1177/1740774519839066. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
Stakeholder engagement: a model for tobacco policy planning in Oklahoma Tribal communities.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jan;48(1 Suppl 1):S44-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.025.
5
Fostering Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Research in Tribal Communities: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):271-278. doi: 10.1177/1556264619872640. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
Balancing Tribal Sovereignty and the Role of Interjurisdictional Partnerships in Oklahoma.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Jan-Feb;22 Suppl 1:S94-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000329.
7
Empowering Equitable Data Use Partnerships and Indigenous Data Sovereignties Amid Pandemic Genomics.
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;9:742467. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.742467. eCollection 2021.
8
Self-Determination in Health Research: An Alaska Native Example of Tribal Ownership and Research Regulation.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 31;14(11):1324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111324.
10
Tribal IRBs: A Framework for Understanding Research Oversight in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities.
Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2019;26(2):71-95. doi: 10.5820/aian.2602.2019.71.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving inclusive healthcare through integrating education and research with AI and personalized curricula.
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Aug 16;5(1):356. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-01034-y.
5
Social and scientific motivations to move beyond groups in allele frequencies: The TOPMed experience.
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep 1;109(9):1582-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.07.008.
6
Is there a way to reduce the inequity in variant interpretation on the basis of ancestry?
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Jun 2;109(6):981-988. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.012.
7
Using Indigenous Standards to Implement the CARE Principles: Setting Expectations through Tribal Research Codes.
Front Genet. 2022 Mar 21;13:823309. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.823309. eCollection 2022.
8
Perspectives on Genetic Research: Results From a Survey of Navajo Community Members.
Front Genet. 2021 Dec 2;12:734529. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.734529. eCollection 2021.
9
Power Sharing, Capacity Building, and Evolving Roles in ELSI: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research.
Collaborations (Coral Gables). 2020;3(1). doi: 10.33596/coll.71. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
Participation in genetic research among Latinx populations by Latin America birth-residency concordance: a global study.
J Community Genet. 2021 Oct;12(4):603-615. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00538-z. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Offspring sex impacts DNA methylation and gene expression in placentae from women with diabetes during pregnancy.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0190698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190698. eCollection 2018.
2
Human genomics projects and precision medicine.
Gene Ther. 2017 Sep;24(9):551-561. doi: 10.1038/gt.2017.77. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
ENGAGING NATIVE AMERICANS IN GENOMICS RESEARCH.
Am Anthropol. 2015 Dec;117(4):743-744. doi: 10.1111/aman.12369. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
6
Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001 to 2009.
JAMA. 2014 May 7;311(17):1778-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3201.
7
Ethical, legal, social, and policy implications of behavioral genetics.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2013;14:515-34. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163743. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
9
Genomics, type 2 diabetes, and obesity.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 9;363(24):2339-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0906948.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验