Department of Pediatrics, Section of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Heath Services Authority, Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma, Durant, Oklahoma.
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1206-1212. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz062.
Research misconduct and consequential harms have been inflicted upon American Indian/Alaska Native communities for decades. To protect their people and culture and to retain oversight over research, many Native communities have established tribal health research and institutional review boards. The Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) Study showcases a successful, trusting research collaboration with tribal nations and academic investigators in Oklahoma. In 2006, the TODAY Study investigators proposed a modification of the study protocol to collect biological specimens from participants for genomic analyses and indefinite storage. Partnering American Indian tribal nations elected not to participate in the genomics collection and repository proposal. Reasons included 1) protection of cultural values, 2) concerns regarding community anonymity, 3) a potential threat to tribal services eligibility, 4) broad informed consent language, and 5) vague definitions of data access and usage. The nations believed the proposed genomics analyses presented a risk of harm to their people and nations without clear benefit. Since the 2006 proposal and the advancement of genomics research, many tribal communities in Oklahoma, appreciating the potential benefits of genomic research, are developing policies regarding oversight of/access to data and biological specimens to mitigate risks and provide members and communities with opportunities to participate in safe and meaningful genomic research.
几十年来,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民社区一直受到学术不端行为及其后果的伤害。为了保护他们的人民和文化,并保留对研究的监督,许多原住民社区已经建立了部落健康研究和机构审查委员会。《2 型糖尿病青少年和青年治疗选择(TODAY)研究》展示了与俄克拉荷马州部落民族和学术研究人员成功建立的信任研究合作关系。2006 年,TODAY 研究人员提议修改研究方案,从参与者身上采集生物样本进行基因组分析和无限期储存。合作伙伴美洲印第安部落国家选择不参与基因组收集和储存库提案。原因包括 1)保护文化价值观,2)对社区匿名性的担忧,3)对部落服务资格的潜在威胁,4)广泛的知情同意语言,以及 5)数据访问和使用的定义模糊。这些国家认为,拟议中的基因组分析对他们的人民和国家构成了风险,而没有明确的好处。自 2006 年的提案和基因组学研究的进展以来,俄克拉荷马州的许多部落社区赞赏基因组研究的潜在好处,正在制定关于数据和生物样本监督/访问的政策,以减轻风险,并为成员和社区提供参与安全和有意义的基因组研究的机会。