Kardum Hjort Cecilia, Paris Josephine R, Olsson Peter, Herbertsson Lina, de Miranda Joachim R, Dudaniec Rachael Y, Smith Henrik G
Department of Biology Lund University Lund Sweden.
School of Natural Sciences Macquarie University Sydney Australia.
Evol Appl. 2022 Mar 14;15(3):365-382. doi: 10.1111/eva.13346. eCollection 2022 Mar.
The global movement of bees for agricultural pollination services can affect local pollinator populations via hybridization. When commercial bumblebees are of the same species but of different geographic origin, intraspecific hybridization may result in beneficial integration of new genetic variation, or alternatively may disrupt locally adapted gene complexes. However, neither the existence nor the extent of genomic introgression and evolutionary divergence between wild and commercial bumblebees is fully understood. We obtained whole-genome sequencing data from wild and commercial collected from sites in Southern Sweden with and without long-term use of commercially imported . . We search for evidence of introgression, dispersal and genome-wide differentiation in a comparative genomic analysis of wild and commercial bumblebees. Commercial . were found in natural environments near sites where commercial bumblebees were used, as well as drifting wild . in commercial bumblebee colonies. However, we found no evidence for widespread, recent genomic introgression of commercial . into local wild conspecific populations. We found that wild . had significantly higher nucleotide diversity (Nei's pi, , while the number of segregating sites (Watterson's theta, ) was higher in commercial . . A highly divergent region on chromosome 11 was identified in commercial . and found to be enriched with structural variants. The genes present in this region are involved in flight muscle contraction and structure and pathogen immune response, providing evidence for differing evolutionary processes operating in wild and commercial . . We did not find evidence for recent introgression, suggesting that co-occurring commercial . have not disrupted evolutionary processes in wild . populations.
蜜蜂为农业授粉服务的全球移动可能通过杂交影响当地传粉者种群。当商业用大黄蜂属于同一物种但地理来源不同时,种内杂交可能导致新遗传变异的有益整合,或者也可能破坏当地适应的基因复合体。然而,野生和商业用大黄蜂之间基因组渐渗的存在与否以及进化分歧的程度尚未完全明了。我们从瑞典南部有和没有长期使用商业进口[未提及具体物品]的地点采集的野生和商业用[未提及具体物品]中获得了全基因组测序数据。我们在野生和商业用大黄蜂的比较基因组分析中寻找渐渗、扩散和全基因组分化的证据。在使用商业用大黄蜂的地点附近的自然环境中发现了商业用[未提及具体物品],以及在商业用大黄蜂蜂群中有野生[未提及具体物品]的漂移个体。然而,我们没有发现商业用[未提及具体物品]广泛、近期基因组渐渗到当地野生同种种群的证据。我们发现野生[未提及具体物品]的核苷酸多样性显著更高(Nei氏π值,[未提及具体数值]),而商业用[未提及具体物品]的分离位点数(Watterson氏θ值,[未提及具体数值])更高。在商业用[未提及具体物品]中鉴定出11号染色体上一个高度分化的区域,发现该区域富含结构变异。该区域存在的基因参与飞行肌肉收缩与结构以及病原体免疫反应,为野生和商业用[未提及具体物品]中不同的进化过程提供了证据。我们没有发现近期渐渗的证据,这表明同时存在的商业用[未提及具体物品]没有破坏野生[未提及具体物品]种群的进化过程。