• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威工作场所新型跨学科工作健康干预与传统单学科福利干预的比较:实用整群随机试验方案

Comparing the New Interdisciplinary Health in Work Intervention With Conventional Monodisciplinary Welfare Interventions at Norwegian Workplaces: Protocol for a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Höper Anje Christina, Terjesen Christoffer Lilja, Fleten Nils

机构信息

Occupational Health in the North, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 7;11(4):e36166. doi: 10.2196/36166.

DOI:10.2196/36166
PMID:35388792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9030981/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal and mental health complaints are the dominant diagnostic categories in long-term sick leave and disability pensions in Norway. Continuing to work despite health complaints is often beneficial, and a good work environment can improve work inclusion for people affected. In 2001, the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration began to offer inclusive work measures to improve the psychosocial work environment and work inclusion of people with health complaints. In 2018, the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration and specialist health services started offering the new collaborative Health in work program. Its workplace intervention presents health and welfare information that may improve employees' coping ability regarding common health complaints. It encourages understanding of coworkers' health complaints and appropriate work adjustments to increase work participation.

OBJECTIVE

This protocol presents an ongoing, 2-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomized trial. Its aim is to compare the effect of monodisciplinary inclusive work measures (treatment as usual) and interdisciplinary Health in work in terms of changes in overall sickness absence, health care use, health-related quality of life, and costs. The secondary objectives are to compare changes in individual sickness absence, psychosocial work environment, job and life satisfaction, health, and health anxiety at both the individual and group levels.

METHODS

Data will be collected from national registers, trial-specific registrations, and questionnaires. Effects will be explored using difference-in-difference analysis and regression modeling. Multilevel analysis will visualize any cluster effects using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Inclusion was completed in July 2021 with 97 workplaces and 1383 individual consents. Data collection will be completed with the last questionnaires to be sent out in July 2023.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial will contribute to filling knowledge gaps regarding the effectiveness and costs of workplace interventions, thereby benefiting health and welfare services, political decision makers, and the public and business sectors. The findings will be disseminated in reports, peer-reviewed journals, and conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04000035; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04000035.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/36166.

摘要

背景

肌肉骨骼和心理健康问题是挪威长期病假和残疾抚恤金的主要诊断类别。尽管有健康问题仍继续工作通常是有益的,良好的工作环境可以提高受影响人群的工作融入度。2001年,挪威劳动和福利管理局开始提供包容性工作措施,以改善心理社会工作环境和有健康问题人员的工作融入度。2018年,挪威劳动和福利管理局与专业卫生服务机构开始推出新的合作项目“工作中的健康”。其工作场所干预提供健康和福利信息,可能会提高员工应对常见健康问题的能力。它鼓励理解同事的健康问题并进行适当的工作调整,以增加工作参与度。

目的

本方案介绍了一项正在进行的双臂实用整群随机试验。其目的是比较单学科包容性工作措施(常规治疗)和跨学科“工作中的健康”项目在总体病假天数、医疗保健使用、健康相关生活质量和成本变化方面的效果。次要目标是比较个体和群体层面上个体病假天数、心理社会工作环境、工作和生活满意度、健康状况以及健康焦虑的变化。

方法

将从国家登记册、特定试验登记和问卷中收集数据。将使用差异分析和回归模型来探索效果。多水平分析将使用组内相关系数来直观显示任何整群效应。

结果

纳入工作于2021年7月完成,有97个工作场所和1383份个人同意书。数据收集将随着2023年7月发出的最后一批问卷完成。

结论

这项试验将有助于填补关于工作场所干预效果和成本的知识空白,从而使健康和福利服务、政治决策者以及公共和商业部门受益。研究结果将在报告、同行评审期刊和会议上传播。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04000035;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04000035。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/36166。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f5/9030981/05637b5db0ae/resprot_v11i4e36166_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f5/9030981/d6b8f7c7e03e/resprot_v11i4e36166_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f5/9030981/05637b5db0ae/resprot_v11i4e36166_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f5/9030981/d6b8f7c7e03e/resprot_v11i4e36166_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63f5/9030981/05637b5db0ae/resprot_v11i4e36166_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the New Interdisciplinary Health in Work Intervention With Conventional Monodisciplinary Welfare Interventions at Norwegian Workplaces: Protocol for a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.挪威工作场所新型跨学科工作健康干预与传统单学科福利干预的比较:实用整群随机试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Apr 7;11(4):e36166. doi: 10.2196/36166.
2
Protocol for the atWork trial: a randomised controlled trial of a workplace intervention targeting subjective health complaints.“工作时”试验方案:一项针对主观健康问题的工作场所干预随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 19;16(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3515-x.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Effects of Interventions to Prevent Work-Related Asthma, Allergy, and Other Hypersensitivity Reactions in Norwegian Salmon Industry Workers (SHInE): Protocol for a Pragmatic Allocated Intervention Trial and Related Substudies.预防挪威鲑鱼产业工人工作相关哮喘、过敏及其他超敏反应的干预措施效果(SHInE):一项实用分配干预试验及相关子研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jul 19;12:e48790. doi: 10.2196/48790.
5
Effectiveness of the Labour Inspection Authority's regulatory tools for work environment and employee health: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial among Norwegian home-care workers.劳动监察局工作环境与员工健康监管工具的有效性:挪威家庭护理人员集群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e031226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031226.
6
Combined cognitive and vocational interventions after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.轻至中度创伤性脑损伤后的认知与职业联合干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2218-7.
7
Motivational interviewing in long-term sickness absence: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial followed by qualitative and economic studies.动机性访谈在长期病假中的应用:一项随机对照试验的研究方案,随后进行定性和经济研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jun 18;18(1):756. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5686-0.
8
Prevention of recurrent sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial with cost-benefit and effectiveness evaluation.预防常见精神障碍员工再次缺勤:一项具有成本效益和有效性评估的集群随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Mar 15;10:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-132.
9
A Mobile Health Intervention for Patients With Depressive Symptoms: Protocol for an Economic Evaluation Alongside Two Randomized Trials in Brazil and Peru.一项针对有抑郁症状患者的移动健康干预措施:在巴西和秘鲁两项随机试验基础上进行经济评估的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 13;10(10):e26164. doi: 10.2196/26164.
10
Preventing sickness absenteeism among employees with common mental disorders or stress-related symptoms at work: Design of a cluster randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving based intervention versus care-as-usual conducted at the Occupational Health Services.预防患有常见精神障碍或工作中与压力相关症状的员工旷工:在职业健康服务机构进行的一项基于问题解决的干预措施与常规护理的整群随机对照试验设计。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 12;17(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4329-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of an intersectoral universal workplace intervention on health related quality of life and wellbeing in a pragmatic cluster randomised trial.在一项实用的整群随机试验中,跨部门通用工作场所干预对健康相关生活质量和幸福感的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12221-1.
2
The level of health anxiety before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情前后的健康焦虑水平。
PLoS One. 2023 May 24;18(5):e0285799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285799. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term sickness absence among young and middle-aged workers in Norway: the impact of a population-level intervention.挪威年轻和中年工人的长期病假:一项人口水平干预的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 24;20(1):1157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09205-3.
2
Twelve-month effect of chronic pain self-management intervention delivered in an easily accessible primary healthcare service - a randomised controlled trial.在易于获得的初级医疗服务中开展慢性疼痛自我管理干预的12个月效果——一项随机对照试验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1012. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3843-x.
3
Effect of Reassuring Information About Musculoskeletal and Mental Health Complaints at the Workplace: A Cluster Randomized Trial of the atWork Intervention.
工作场所肌肉骨骼和心理健康投诉的安抚信息的效果:atWork 干预的一项集群随机试验。
J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(2):274-285. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9786-6.
4
Increasing response rates to follow-up questionnaires in health intervention research: Randomized controlled trial of a gift card prize incentive.提高健康干预研究中后续调查问卷的回复率:礼品卡奖励的随机对照试验
Clin Trials. 2017 Aug;14(4):381-386. doi: 10.1177/1740774517703320. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
5
Can group-based reassuring information alter low back pain behavior? A cluster-randomized controlled trial.基于群体的安慰性信息能否改变腰痛行为?一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 27;12(3):e0172003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172003. eCollection 2017.
6
Reduction in sick leave by a workplace educational low back pain intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial.通过工作场所教育性腰痛干预措施减少病假:一项整群随机对照试验。
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Aug;44(6):571-9. doi: 10.1177/1403494816653854. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
The mental health benefits of employment: Results of a systematic meta-review.就业对心理健康的益处:一项系统的元分析综述结果
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;24(4):331-6. doi: 10.1177/1039856215618523. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
8
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
9
Effect of peer-based low back pain information and reassurance at the workplace on sick leave: a cluster randomized trial.基于同伴的腰痛信息和工作场所安慰对病假的影响:一项集群随机试验。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun;23(2):209-19. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9451-z.
10
Systematic review of active workplace interventions to reduce sickness absence.系统综述:主动工作场所干预措施以减少病假缺勤
Occup Med (Lond). 2013 Jan;63(1):7-16. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqs198. Epub 2012 Dec 5.