• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构启动在年轻人中至少持续一个月,但在健康的老年人中则不然。

Structural priming persists for (at least) one month in young adults, but not in healthy older adults.

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute.

School of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Aug;48(8):1219-1234. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001123. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0001123
PMID:35389705
Abstract

Implicit learning theories suggest that we update syntactic knowledge based on prior experience (e.g., Chang et al., 2006). To determine the limits of the extent to which implicit learning can influence syntactic processing, we investigated whether structural priming effects persist up to 1 month postexposure, and whether they persist less long in healthy older (compared to younger) adults. We conducted a longitudinal experiment with three sessions: Session A, Session B (1 week after A), and Session C (4 weeks after B). For young adults, we found passive priming effects to persist and accumulate across sessions (1 week and 4 weeks). However, for older adults the effects persisted for 1 week but not 4. This suggests that for young adults, who unlike older adults experience no age-related decline in implicit memory, the limit to the duration of structural priming persistence is longer than 4 weeks. In a second longitudinal experiment with two sessions 1 week apart we found that priming in Session A affected syntactic processing in a different, independent task in Session B, both for young and older adults. Experiment 2 suggests that implicit persistence of the learned syntax is not limited to a specific context or task. Together, our findings give insight into how structural priming can contribute to language change throughout the life span, showing that implicit learning is a pervasive and robust mechanism that contributes to syntactic processing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

内隐学习理论表明,我们会根据先前的经验(例如,Chang 等人,2006 年)更新语法知识。为了确定内隐学习在多大程度上可以影响语法处理,我们研究了结构启动效应是否会在暴露后持续长达 1 个月,以及在健康的老年人(与年轻人相比)中是否持续时间更短。我们进行了一项具有三个阶段的纵向实验:A 阶段、B 阶段(A 阶段后 1 周)和 C 阶段(B 阶段后 4 周)。对于年轻成年人,我们发现被动启动效应在各个阶段(1 周和 4 周)都持续存在并积累。然而,对于老年人,这种效应只持续了 1 周,而不是 4 周。这表明,对于不像老年人那样在内隐记忆方面经历年龄相关下降的年轻成年人来说,结构启动持续时间的限制超过 4 周。在第二个具有两个相隔 1 周的阶段的纵向实验中,我们发现 A 阶段的启动会影响年轻成年人和老年人在 B 阶段的不同、独立任务中的语法处理。实验 2 表明,所学到的语法的内隐持续时间不限于特定的上下文或任务。总的来说,我们的研究结果深入了解了结构启动如何在整个生命周期中促进语言变化,表明内隐学习是一种普遍而强大的机制,有助于语法处理。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Structural priming persists for (at least) one month in young adults, but not in healthy older adults.结构启动在年轻人中至少持续一个月,但在健康的老年人中则不然。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Aug;48(8):1219-1234. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001123. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Structural priming is determined by global syntax rather than internal phrasal structure: Evidence from young and older adults.结构启动由全局句法决定,而不是内部短语结构决定:来自年轻人和老年人的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(4):720-740. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000754. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
3
Consistent and cumulative effects of syntactic experience in children's sentence production: Evidence for error-based implicit learning.句法经验对儿童句子生成的持续累积效应:基于错误的内隐学习证据。
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
The Persistence of Priming: Exploring Long-lasting Syntactic Priming Effects in Children and Adults.启动效应的持续性:探究儿童和成人中持久的句法启动效应。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Jun;45(6):e13005. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13005.
5
Priming Sentence Production in Older Adults: Evidence for Preserved Implicit Learning.老年人的启动句生成:内隐学习保留的证据
Aphasiology. 2024;38(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2153326. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
6
The development of abstract syntax: evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost.抽象语法的发展:来自结构启动和词汇提升的证据。
Cognition. 2012 Oct;125(1):49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
7
Does language help regularity learning? The influence of verbalizations on implicit sequential regularity learning and the emergence of explicit knowledge in children, younger and older adults.语言有助于规则学习吗?言语表达对儿童、年轻人和老年人内隐序列规则学习及外显知识形成的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Mar;53(3):597-610. doi: 10.1037/dev0000262. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
8
On the limits of shared syntactic representations: When word order variation blocks priming between an artificial language and Dutch.在共享句法表示的限制范围内:当词序变化阻止人工语言和荷兰语之间的启动时。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Sep;47(9):1471-1493. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000997. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
9
Structural priming is supported by different components of nondeclarative memory: Evidence from priming across the lifespan.结构启动受非陈述性记忆的不同成分支持:来自全生命周期启动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 May;47(5):820-837. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000955. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming?动词偏向是否调节句法启动?
Cognition. 2010 Mar;114(3):455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.005. Epub 2010 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural Priming in Aphasia: A State-of-the-Art Review and Future Directions.失语症中的结构启动:现状综述与未来方向
Aphasiology. 2024 Dec 25. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2445660.
2
Implicit structural priming as a treatment component for aphasia: Specifying essential learning conditions.内隐结构启动作为失语症的一种治疗成分:明确基本学习条件。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2024 Jul-Sep;41(5-6):190-214. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2025.2479485. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
3
Ageing of grammatical advance planning in spoken sentence production: an eye movement study.
口语句子生成中语法预先规划的老化:一项眼动研究。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):652-669. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01861-5. Epub 2023 Aug 10.