Lee Jiyeon
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Aphasiology. 2024 Dec 25. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2445660.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Decades of research on structural priming - speakers' tacit reuse of previously encountered syntactic structures in subsequent production and comprehension of sentences - has made substantial contributions to theories of syntactic representations, processing, and language learning and acquisition. There is growing interest in the application of structural priming to assess and facilitate language processing and learning in clinical populations. Yet, little research has explored structural priming in aphasia. The purpose of this paper is to provide a state-of-the art review of structural priming studies in aphasia and provide future research directions with an eye towards using structural priming for aphasia rehabilitation.
Structural priming occurs not only in laboratory settings, but also in everyday speech, across many simple to complex grammatical structures, different languages, and throughout the lifespan. Importantly, a body of literature suggests that structural priming may reflect processes of implicit learning, strengthening the language user's ability to map messages and sentence structures. With respect to aphasia, existing studies have discovered that priming can help persons with aphasia (PWA) produce and comprehend more complex sentences that are otherwise difficult to produce or comprehend on their own. Additionally, priming effects transfer across production and comprehension modalities, and create long-lasting, cumulative improvements of sentence processing in PWA.
The review of the literature suggests that structural priming can be used to assess PWA's ability to access various syntactic structures but also to intervene sentence production deficits in PWA. Future research is recommended to systematically investigate functions of structural priming for widespread recovery of aphasia beyond increasing syntactic complexity, to delineate essential tenants of structural priming intervention at both person and treatment levels, and to examine its use for cross-linguistic treatment of bi/multi-lingual aphasia.
数十年来对结构启动效应的研究——即说话者在后续句子的生成和理解中隐性地重复使用先前遇到的句法结构——为句法表征、加工以及语言学习与习得的理论做出了重大贡献。人们越来越关注将结构启动效应应用于评估和促进临床人群的语言加工与学习。然而,很少有研究探讨失语症中的结构启动效应。本文旨在对失语症结构启动效应研究进行最新综述,并展望未来研究方向,以期将结构启动效应用于失语症康复治疗。
结构启动效应不仅出现在实验室环境中,也出现在日常言语中,涉及许多从简单到复杂的语法结构、不同语言以及人的整个生命周期。重要的是,大量文献表明结构启动效应可能反映了内隐学习过程,增强了语言使用者映射信息和句子结构的能力。关于失语症,现有研究发现启动效应可以帮助失语症患者生成和理解更复杂的句子,而这些句子他们原本难以自行生成或理解。此外,启动效应可以在生成和理解两种模式之间转换,并能使失语症患者的句子加工能力得到持久、累积性的改善。
文献综述表明,结构启动效应不仅可用于评估失语症患者获取各种句法结构的能力,还可用于干预失语症患者的句子生成缺陷。建议未来研究系统地探究结构启动效应在促进失语症广泛恢复方面的作用,而不仅仅是增加句法复杂性;在个体和治疗层面明确结构启动效应干预的关键要素;并研究其在双语/多语失语症跨语言治疗中的应用。