• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氦调谐频率的测量:量子电动力学的独立检验。

Measurement of a helium tune-out frequency: an independent test of quantum electrodynamics.

机构信息

Department of Quantum Science and Technology, Research School of Physics, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.

Centre for Quantum and Optical Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC 3122, Australia.

出版信息

Science. 2022 Apr 8;376(6589):199-203. doi: 10.1126/science.abk2502. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1126/science.abk2502
PMID:35389780
Abstract

Despite quantum electrodynamics (QED) being one of the most stringently tested theories underpinning modern physics, recent precision atomic spectroscopy measurements have uncovered several small discrepancies between experiment and theory. One particularly powerful experimental observable that tests QED independently of traditional energy level measurements is the "tune-out" frequency, where the dynamic polarizability vanishes and the atom does not interact with applied laser light. In this work, we measure the tune-out frequency for the 2 state of helium between transitions to the 2 and 3 manifolds and compare it with new theoretical QED calculations. The experimentally determined value of 725,736,700(260) megahertz differs from theory [725,736,252(9) megahertz] by 1.7 times the measurement uncertainty and resolves both the QED contributions and retardation corrections.

摘要

尽管量子电动力学(QED)是现代物理学中经过最严格测试的理论之一,但最近的高精度原子光谱测量结果表明,实验和理论之间存在一些小的差异。一个特别强大的实验可观测量,它可以独立于传统的能级测量来检验 QED,就是“调谐出”频率,在这个频率下,动态极化率为零,原子与外加激光光不相互作用。在这项工作中,我们测量了氦的 2 态在跃迁到 2 和 3 能级之间的调谐出频率,并将其与新的理论 QED 计算进行了比较。实验确定的值为 725,736,700(260)兆赫,与理论值[725,736,252(9)兆赫]相差 1.7 倍的测量不确定度,解决了 QED 贡献和延迟修正两个问题。

相似文献

1
Measurement of a helium tune-out frequency: an independent test of quantum electrodynamics.氦调谐频率的测量:量子电动力学的独立检验。
Science. 2022 Apr 8;376(6589):199-203. doi: 10.1126/science.abk2502. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
2
Precision Measurement for Metastable Helium Atoms of the 413 nm Tune-Out Wavelength at Which the Atomic Polarizability Vanishes.413nm 调谐消光波长处亚稳态氦原子的精密测量,该处原子极化率为零。
Phys Rev Lett. 2015 Jul 24;115(4):043004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.043004.
3
QED corrections to the correlated relativistic energy: One-photon processes.对关联相对论能量的量子电动力学修正:单光子过程。
J Chem Phys. 2024 May 28;160(20). doi: 10.1063/5.0193250.
4
Testing quantum electrodynamics in extreme fields using helium-like uranium.使用类氦铀检验极端条件下的量子电动力学。
Nature. 2024 Jan;625(7996):673-678. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06910-y. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Precision Measurement of the n=2 Triplet P J=1 to J=0 Fine Structure of Atomic Helium Using Frequency-Offset Separated Oscillatory Fields.利用频率偏移分离振荡场对氦原子n = 2三重态P J = 1到J = 0精细结构的精确测量。
Phys Rev Lett. 2024 Apr 19;132(16):163001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.163001.
6
Electric dipole polarizabilities and tune-out wavelengths for 23S1 and 33S1 states of Be2.铍分子(Be₂)的2³S₁和3³S₁态的电偶极极化率及失谐波长
J Chem Phys. 2024 Oct 7;161(13). doi: 10.1063/5.0229060.
7
Direct Measurement of the Forbidden 2^{3}S_{1}→3^{3}S_{1} Atomic Transition in Helium.氦中禁戒的2³S₁→3³S₁原子跃迁的直接测量
Phys Rev Lett. 2020 Jul 3;125(1):013002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.013002.
8
Effects of adiabatic, relativistic, and quantum electrodynamics interactions on the pair potential and thermophysical properties of helium.绝热、相对论和量子电动力学相互作用对氦的对势能和热物理性质的影响。
J Chem Phys. 2012 Jun 14;136(22):224303. doi: 10.1063/1.4712218.
9
Measurement of the bound-electron g-factor difference in coupled ions.测量耦合离子中束缚电子 g 因子的差异。
Nature. 2022 Jun;606(7914):479-483. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04807-w. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
10
Is the proton radius a player in the redefinition of the International System of Units?质子半径是否是重新定义国际单位制的一个因素?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011 Oct 28;369(1953):4064-77. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0233.