Shahangian Seyyed Ahmadreza, Tabesh Massoud, Yazdanpanah Masoud, Zobeidi Tahereh, Raoof Mohammad Amin
School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jul 1;313:115005. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115005. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
As concerning with water insecurity driven by water scarcity threatens the lives and livelihoods of humanity worldwide, urban water demand management is focused on promoting residential water conservation behaviors (WCBs) as a critical policy response to water scarcity. However, urban water conservation initiatives cannot be successful unless households involve in residential WCBs voluntarily by adopting water curtailment and/or water-efficiency actions. Thus, understanding motivations and mechanisms underlying accepting these two types of WCBs and interpreting their distinctions are primary policy considerations to make sustainable water consumption behaviors. Hence, the purpose of this research was twofold: (1) To explore intentions to household adoption of water curtailment and water-efficiency actions, key corresponding determinants, and distinctions between them; and (2) To evaluate the capability and robustness of the Health Belief Model (HBM) to explain residential WCBs. The present research design was a cross-sectional survey conducted in Tehran, Iran. The outcomes from structural equation modeling indicated that: (1) Water curtailment intention was solely determined by self-efficacy and perceived benefits; (2) In addition to self-efficacy and perceived benefits, perceived severity, cues to action, and perceived barriers were significantly related to water-efficiency intention; (3) While only perceived susceptibility was not a significant determinant for water-efficiency intention, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived barriers, and cues to action could not significantly explain water curtailment intention; (4) Self-efficacy also emerged as the strongest predictive variable behind intentions to adopt both WCBs; (5) The perceived barriers had a negative significant relationship only with water-efficiency intention; and (6) The HBM could explain 72% and 61% of the variance in households' intentions to adopt water curtailment and water-efficiency actions, respectively. These outcomes supported that the HBM could propose a reliable and practical heuristic theoretical framework to predict residential WCBs. Moreover, the findings confirmed significant differences among socio-psychological factors behind intentions to household adoption of both WCBs, which need to be addressed. The research results introduced numerous implications from theoretical and policy standpoints for improving residential WCBs.
由于水资源短缺导致的水安全问题威胁着全球人类的生命和生计,城市用水需求管理致力于促进居民节水行为,将其作为应对水资源短缺的一项关键政策措施。然而,除非家庭通过采取节水和/或提高用水效率的行动自愿参与居民节水行为,否则城市节水倡议就不会成功。因此,了解接受这两种节水行为背后的动机和机制,并解释它们之间的区别,是促使可持续用水行为的主要政策考量因素。因此,本研究的目的有两个:(1)探究家庭采取节水和提高用水效率行动的意愿、相应的关键决定因素以及它们之间的区别;(2)评估健康信念模型(HBM)解释居民节水行为的能力和稳健性。本研究设计是在伊朗德黑兰进行的一项横断面调查。结构方程模型的结果表明:(1)节水意愿仅由自我效能感和感知收益决定;(2)除自我效能感和感知收益外,感知严重性、行动线索和感知障碍与提高用水效率的意愿显著相关;(3)虽然只有感知易感性不是提高用水效率意愿的显著决定因素,但感知易感性、感知严重性、感知障碍和行动线索并不能显著解释节水意愿;(4)自我效能感也是采取这两种节水行为意愿背后最强的预测变量;(5)感知障碍仅与提高用水效率的意愿呈显著负相关;(6)健康信念模型分别可以解释家庭采取节水和提高用水效率行动意愿中72%和61%的方差。这些结果支持了健康信念模型可以提出一个可靠且实用的启发式理论框架来预测居民节水行为。此外,研究结果证实了家庭采取这两种节水行为意愿背后的社会心理因素存在显著差异,需要加以解决。研究结果从理论和政策角度为改善居民节水行为带来了诸多启示。