Department of Emergency Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department Geography and Urban Studies, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
BMC Neurol. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02653-x.
Large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes are best treated with rapid endovascular therapy (EVT). There are two routes that LVO stroke patients can take to EVT therapy when transported by EMS: primary transport (ambulance transports directly to an endovascular stroke center (ESC) or secondary transport (EMS transports to a non-ESC then transfers for EVT). There is no clear evidence which path to care results in better functional outcomes for LVO stroke patients. To find this answer, an analysis of a large, real-world population of LVO stroke patients must be performed.
A pragmatic registry of LVO stroke patients from nine health systems across the United States. The nine health systems span urban and rural populations as well as the spectrum of socioeconomic statuses. We will use univariate and multivariate analysis to explore the relationships between type of EMS transport, socioeconomic factors, and LVO stroke outcomes. We will use geographic information systems and spatial analysis to examine the complex movements of patients in time and space. To detect an 8% difference between groups, with a 3:1 patient ratio of primary to secondary transports, 95% confidence and 80% power, we will need approximately 1600 patients. The primary outcome is the patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 at 90 days. Subgroup analyses include patients who receive intravenous thrombolysis and duration of stroke systems. Secondary analyses include socioeconomic factors associated with poor outcomes after LVO stroke.
Using the data obtained from the OPUS-REACH registry, we will develop evidence based algorithms for prehospital transport of LVO stroke patients. Unlike prior research, the OPUS-REACH registry contains patient-level data spanning from EMS dispatch to ninety day functional outcomes. We expect that we will find modifiable factors and socioeconomic disparities associated with poor outcomes in LVO stroke. OPUS-REACH with its breadth of locations, detailed patient records, and multidisciplinary researchers will design the optimal prehospital stroke system of care for LVO stroke patients.
大血管闭塞(LVO)中风患者最好通过快速血管内治疗(EVT)进行治疗。当通过 EMS 转运时,LVO 中风患者可以通过两种途径接受 EVT 治疗:直接转运(救护车直接转运至血管内卒中中心(ESC)或二次转运(EMS 转运至非 ESC 然后转院进行 EVT)。目前尚无明确证据表明哪种治疗途径能为 LVO 中风患者带来更好的功能结局。为了找到答案,必须对大量真实世界的 LVO 中风患者进行分析。
这是一项来自美国九个医疗系统的 LVO 中风患者的实用登记研究。这九个医疗系统涵盖了城市和农村人口以及不同社会经济阶层。我们将使用单变量和多变量分析来探讨 EMS 转运类型、社会经济因素与 LVO 中风结局之间的关系。我们将使用地理信息系统和空间分析来检查患者在时间和空间中的复杂运动。为了检测到两组之间 8%的差异,需要 1600 名患者,患者的比例为初级转运至二级转运为 3:1。我们将使用 95%的置信度和 80%的效能检测到主要结局为 90 天改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分≤2。亚组分析包括接受静脉溶栓治疗的患者和中风系统持续时间。次要分析包括与 LVO 中风后不良结局相关的社会经济因素。
我们将利用 OPUS-REACH 登记研究获得的数据,为 LVO 中风患者的院前转运制定基于证据的算法。与之前的研究不同,OPUS-REACH 登记包含从 EMS 派遣到 90 天功能结局的患者水平数据。我们预计,我们将发现与 LVO 中风不良结局相关的可改变因素和社会经济差异。OPUS-REACH 具有广泛的地理位置、详细的患者记录和多学科研究人员,将为 LVO 中风患者设计最佳的院前卒中护理系统。