• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会捐赠对药剂师专业人员参与基于计算机的教育平台的效果:一项试点随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of social giving on the engagement of pharmacy professionals with a computer-based education platform: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03310-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03310-0
PMID:35392902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8988535/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computer-based education is gaining popularity in healthcare professional development education due to ease of distribution and flexibility. However, there are concerns regarding user engagement. This pilot study aims to: 1) assess the feasibility and acceptability of a social reward and the corresponding study design; and 2) to provide preliminary data on the impact of social reward on user engagement.

METHODS

A mixed method study combing a four-month pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), surveys and interviews. The RCT was conducted using a computer-based education platform. Participants in the intervention group had access to a social reward feature, where they earned one meal for donation when completing a quiz with a passing score. Participants in the control group did not have access to this feature. Feasibility and acceptability of the social reward were assessed using surveys and telephone interviews. Feasibility of the RCT was assessed by participant recruitment and retention. User engagement was assessed by number of quizzes and modules completed.

RESULTS

A total of 30 pharmacy professionals were recruited with 15 users in each arm. Participants reported high acceptability of the intervention. The total number of quizzes completed by the intervention group was significantly higher compared to the control group (n = 267 quizzes Vs. n = 97 quizzes; p-value 0.023).

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of a web-based trial with pharmacy professionals and the social reward intervention. It also shows that the social reward can improve user engagement. A future definitive RCT will explore the sustainability of the intervention.

摘要

背景

由于易于分发和灵活,基于计算机的教育在医疗保健专业人员发展教育中越来越受欢迎。但是,人们对用户参与度存在担忧。这项试点研究旨在:1)评估社交奖励的可行性和可接受性及其相应的研究设计;2)提供社交奖励对用户参与度影响的初步数据。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究,结合了为期四个月的试点随机对照试验(RCT)、调查和访谈。RCT 使用基于计算机的教育平台进行。干预组的参与者可以访问社交奖励功能,在完成测验并获得及格分数时,他们可以获得一次捐赠餐。对照组的参与者无法访问此功能。通过调查和电话访谈评估社交奖励的可行性和可接受性。通过参与者招募和保留评估 RCT 的可行性。通过完成的测验和模块数量评估用户参与度。

结果

共招募了 30 名药剂师专业人员,每组 15 名参与者。参与者报告对干预措施的接受度很高。干预组完成的测验总数明显高于对照组(n=267 次测验与 n=97 次测验;p 值为 0.023)。

结论

该研究表明,在药剂师专业人员中进行基于网络的试验和社交奖励干预是可行且可接受的。它还表明,社交奖励可以提高用户参与度。未来的确定性 RCT 将探讨干预措施的可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/8991464/1f3e678fb241/12909_2022_3310_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/8991464/877356cd0e71/12909_2022_3310_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/8991464/e375a83af2c5/12909_2022_3310_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/8991464/1f3e678fb241/12909_2022_3310_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/8991464/877356cd0e71/12909_2022_3310_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/8991464/e375a83af2c5/12909_2022_3310_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e68c/8991464/1f3e678fb241/12909_2022_3310_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of social giving on the engagement of pharmacy professionals with a computer-based education platform: a pilot randomized controlled trial.社会捐赠对药剂师专业人员参与基于计算机的教育平台的效果:一项试点随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03310-0.
2
Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT.择期骨科手术前行为干预以减少饮酒:PRE-OP BIRDS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(12):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24120.
3
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.居家临终患者按需皮下注射治疗突破性症状的照护者管理:CARiAD 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250.
4
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
5
Individualised placement and support programme for people unemployed because of chronic pain: a feasibility study and the InSTEP pilot RCT.因慢性疼痛而失业的人群的个体化安置和支持计划:一项可行性研究和 InSTEP 试点 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(5):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta25050.
6
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
7
Sexual health promotion in people with severe mental illness: the RESPECT feasibility RCT.严重精神疾病患者的性健康促进:尊重可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(65):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta23650.
8
'Is insulin right for me?': Feasibility of a pilot randomised controlled trial and acceptability of a web-based intervention to reduce psychological barriers to insulin therapy among adults with type 2 diabetes.“胰岛素适合我吗?”:一项关于减少 2 型糖尿病成人对胰岛素治疗心理障碍的基于网络的干预措施的可行性随机对照试验和可接受性的试点研究。
Diabet Med. 2022 Mar;39(3):e14759. doi: 10.1111/dme.14759. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
9
Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): results of a pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention investigating acceptability and feasibility.为失语症患者歌唱(SPA):一项关于团体歌唱干预的初步可行性随机对照试验结果,该试验调查了可接受性和可行性。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):e040544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040544.
10
The feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of physiotherapy for adults with joint hypermobility syndrome.针对关节活动过度综合征成人患者进行物理治疗随机对照试验的可行性。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Jun;20(47):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta20470.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the effect of computer-based education on pharmacist behaviour regarding point-of-care testing.评估基于计算机的教育对药剂师在即时检验方面行为的影响。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Mar 7;18:100586. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100586. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying barriers, facilitators and behaviour change techniques to the adoption of the full scope of pharmacy practice among pharmacy professionals: Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.识别药学专业人员在采用全面药学实践过程中的障碍、促进因素和行为改变技术:运用理论领域框架
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Aug;17(8):1396-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
A systematic review of the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education.一项系统综述,分析影响健康科学教育中电子学习的因素——促进因素和障碍。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6.
3
Assessing Performance and Engagement on a Computer-Based Education Platform for Pharmacy Practice.
评估基于计算机的药学实践教育平台的性能和参与度。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Feb 24;8(1):26. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8010026.
4
Serious Gaming and Gamification Education in Health Professions: Systematic Review.健康专业中的严肃游戏和游戏化教育:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 28;21(3):e12994. doi: 10.2196/12994.
5
E-learning for health professionals.面向卫生专业人员的电子学习。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 21;1(1):CD011736. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2.
6
An integrative review of e-learning in the delivery of self-management support training for health professionals.电子学习在提供健康专业人员自我管理支持培训中的综合回顾。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1022-0.
7
Interprofessional online learning for primary healthcare: findings from a scoping review.跨专业的初级医疗保健在线学习:综述研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e016872. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016872.
8
Does gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic review.游戏化是否能提高对在线课程的参与度?一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 31;12(3):e0173403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173403. eCollection 2017.
9
CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:随机试点和可行性试验的扩展》
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.