MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 May 10;31(3):1412-1423. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00285. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the Daily Phonotrauma Index (DPI) can quantitatively discriminate large differences in overall vocal status in the daily life of patients with phonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction (PVH).
For 1-4 weeks, 23 females with PVH wore an ambulatory voice monitor and answered three vocal status questions (i.e., difficulty producing soft, high-pitched phonation; discomfort; and fatigue) at the beginning, at 5-hr intervals, and the end of each day. DPI values were obtained for each patient's time periods of worst and best self-rated vocal status, and data for the group were analyzed for significant changes using a linear mixed-effects regression model.
The DPI was significantly lower during periods self-rated as "best vocal status" compared to during periods self-rated as "worst vocal status" (mean difference in DPI = 0.53) with a medium-to-large effect size (Cohen's = -0.68).
In a group of patients with phonotraumatic lesions, the DPI indicated lower potential for phonotrauma during time periods of better vocal status compared to time periods of worse vocal status. Assuming that a large portion of variance in vocal status for patients with PVH is associated with the extent to which voicing is phonotraumatic, these results support the validity of obtaining estimates of DPI for much shorter time periods (i.e., an estimate every 2 min of voicing) than previous studies (i.e., a single estimate for the entire day or week). Future work can investigate the DPI's use for in-clinic assessment/treatment and ambulatory biofeedback and can gain further insights into phonatory mechanisms that underlie DPI via comparisons with other physiologically relevant measures and computational vocal fold modeling.
本研究旨在评估每日声创伤指数(DPI)是否能够定量区分患有声带过度使用性发声障碍(PVH)患者日常生活中整体发声状况的显著差异。
23 名女性 PVH 患者佩戴了可移动的声音监测器,并在每天开始、5 小时间隔和结束时回答三个发声状况问题(即产生柔和、高音调发声的困难;不适;和疲劳)。为每位患者自我评估的最差和最佳发声状态的时间段获取 DPI 值,并使用线性混合效应回归模型分析组数据以确定显著变化。
与自我评估为“最差发声状态”相比,自我评估为“最佳发声状态”的时间段的 DPI 值显著降低(DPI 的平均差异=0.53),具有中到大的效应量(Cohen's = -0.68)。
在一组患有声带创伤性病变的患者中,与自我评估为“较差发声状态”相比,DPI 在发声状态较好的时间段表明声创伤的潜在风险较低。假设 PVH 患者发声状态的大部分方差与发声声创伤的程度相关,这些结果支持在更短的时间段内(即每两分钟发声一次的估计)获得 DPI 估计值的有效性,而不是之前的研究(即全天或一周的单次估计)。未来的工作可以研究 DPI 在门诊评估/治疗和可移动生物反馈中的应用,并通过与其他生理相关的测量和计算声带建模进行比较,进一步深入了解 DPI 背后的发音机制。