Suppr超能文献

传统橡皮圈套扎术与三联橡皮圈套扎术治疗痔疮的前瞻性随机试验

Conventional vs. triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids. A prospective, randomized trial.

作者信息

Poon G P, Chu K W, Lau W Y, Lee J M, Yeung C, Fan S T, Yiu T F, Wong S H, Wong K K

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 Dec;29(12):836-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02555358.

Abstract

Two hundred five patients with symptomatic first- and second-degree hemorrhoids were randomized to receive either conventional rubber band ligation or triple rubber band ligation. In conventional rubber band ligation, the hemorrhoids were ligated at one primary site per session at intervals of four weeks until symptoms were relieved or when all three hemorrhoids were ligated. In triple rubber band ligation, all three primary hemorrhoids were ligated in a single session. After completion of treatment, the patients were examined every three months, or earlier if symptoms recurred. Both methods were effective in the treatment of early hemorrhoids and the incidence of postligation pain and complications was similar. The advantages of having the treatment completed at the initial visit in triple rubber band ligation are obvious. Furthermore, less treatment sessions were required for triple rubber band ligation to control symptoms than for conventional rubber band ligation. Triple rubber band ligation is more cost-effective and therefore is recommended.

摘要

205例有症状的一度和二度痔疮患者被随机分为两组,分别接受传统橡皮圈套扎术或三联橡皮圈套扎术。在传统橡皮圈套扎术中,每次在一个主要部位对痔疮进行套扎,间隔四周,直至症状缓解或所有三个痔疮均被套扎。在三联橡皮圈套扎术中,一次对所有三个主要痔疮进行套扎。治疗完成后,每三个月对患者进行检查,若症状复发则提前检查。两种方法对早期痔疮的治疗均有效,套扎后疼痛和并发症的发生率相似。三联橡皮圈套扎术在初次就诊时即可完成治疗,其优势明显。此外,与传统橡皮圈套扎术相比,三联橡皮圈套扎术控制症状所需的治疗次数更少。三联橡皮圈套扎术更具成本效益,因此推荐使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验