Suppr超能文献

非药物干预对危重症患者睡眠质量的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions on sleep quality in people who are critically ill: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; CIRUS Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jun;130:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104220. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disrupted sleep is a critical and highly prevalent concern among critically ill patients requiring intensive care. However, the question of which nonpharmacological intervention represents the best strategy for improving sleep quality remains unanswered.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions in improving sleep quality in people who are critically ill.

METHODS

Databases, namely PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I, were searched from their inception up until January 15, 2021, for relevant randomised controlled trials. No language or time period restrictions were applied. Only randomised controlled trials examining the effects of nonpharmacological interventions on sleep among adults (aged ≥18 years) admitted to an intensive care unit were included. A random-effects model was used for data analyses. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021232004).

RESULTS

Twenty randomised controlled trials involving 1,207 participants were included. Music combined with earplugs and eye masks (standardised mean difference =1.64), eye masks alone (0.98), aromatherapy (0.87), and earplugs combined with eye masks (0.61) significantly improved sleep quality compared with routine care (all p <0.05). Music combined with earplugs and eye masks significantly enhanced sleep quality in comparison with music (1.34), earplugs combined with eye masks (1.03), and nursing intervention (1.76, all p <0.05). Earplugs alone was less likely to have effects on sleep quality improvement compared with routine care.

CONCLUSION

Eye masks alone and music combined with earplugs and eye masks appear to be the most effective interventions for improving sleep quality in people who are critically ill. Critical care nurses should incorporate the use of eye masks alone or music combined with eye masks into sleep care.

摘要

背景

睡眠紊乱是重症监护患者中一个严重且普遍存在的问题。然而,哪种非药物干预措施最能改善睡眠质量的问题仍未得到解答。

目的

比较非药物干预措施在改善重症患者睡眠质量方面的效果。

方法

从建库起至 2021 年 1 月 15 日,我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I 这四个数据库,以寻找相关的随机对照试验。未对语言或时间范围进行限制。仅纳入了评估非药物干预措施对重症监护病房成人(年龄≥18 岁)睡眠影响的随机对照试验。采用随机效应模型进行数据分析。研究方案在 PROSPERO(CRD42021232004)上进行了注册。

结果

纳入了 20 项随机对照试验,涉及 1207 名参与者。与常规护理相比,音乐联合耳塞和眼罩(标准化均数差=1.64)、眼罩(0.98)、芳香疗法(0.87)和耳塞联合眼罩(0.61)可显著改善睡眠质量(均 p<0.05)。与音乐(1.34)、耳塞联合眼罩(1.03)和护理干预(1.76)相比,音乐联合耳塞和眼罩可显著提高睡眠质量(均 p<0.05)。与常规护理相比,单独使用耳塞不太可能改善睡眠质量。

结论

单独使用眼罩和音乐联合耳塞和眼罩似乎是改善重症患者睡眠质量最有效的干预措施。重症监护护士应将单独使用眼罩或音乐联合眼罩纳入睡眠护理中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验