Suppr超能文献

伐伦克林和安非他酮对戒烟的影响:20 项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

The effect of Varenicline and Bupropion on smoking cessation: A network meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Health Technology Assessment Center/Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China.

Wuwei People's Hospital, Wuwei 733000, China.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2022 Aug;131:107329. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107329. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to investigate the effect of varenicline (VAR), bupropion (BUP), and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) on smoking cessation.

METHODS

Eight databases were searched in May 2021, and only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using varenicline, bupropion, or NRT (single or combined) for smoking cessation were included. The risk of bias in the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook tool. Stata 15.1 software was used to perform NMA, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using Confidence in Network Meta-analysis (CINeMA).

FINDINGS

Twenty RCTs involving 16,702 smokers were included. The risk of bias results showed that 10 RCTs were rated as high, three were low, and seven were unclear. A total of 21 pairs were compared based on seven interventions. The NMA showed that, compared to the placebo (PLA), the other six interventions had significant efficacy in smoking cessation, where VAR + BUP showed the best effect of all treatments (odds ratio (OR) = 6.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) [3.47, 10.66]). Moreover, VAR + BUP was superior to VAR + NRT (OR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.07, 2.59]) and the three monotherapies (VAR, BUP, and NRT). In the monotherapies, the results of pairwise comparisons of VAR, BUP, and NRT did not show significant differences. Finally, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value indicated that VAR + BUP had the greatest probability of becoming the best intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of VAR, BUP, and NRT alone increased the odds of smoking abstinence better than the placebo, combined interventions were superior to monotherapy, and VAR combined with other interventions had a better smoking cessation effect.

摘要

目的

通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)来探究伐伦克林(VAR)、安非他酮(BUP)和尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)对戒烟的影响。

方法

于 2021 年 5 月检索了 8 个数据库,并仅纳入了使用 VAR、BUP 或 NRT(单一或联合)进行戒烟的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用 Cochrane 手册工具评估纳入 RCT 的偏倚风险。使用 Stata 15.1 软件进行 NMA,并使用置信度网络荟萃分析(CINeMA)评估证据质量。

发现

共纳入了 20 项 RCT,涉及 16702 名吸烟者。偏倚风险结果显示,10 项 RCT 被评为高风险,3 项为低风险,7 项为不确定风险。基于 7 种干预措施,共比较了 21 对。NMA 显示,与安慰剂(PLA)相比,其他六种干预措施在戒烟方面均有显著效果,其中 VAR+BUP 的治疗效果最佳(比值比(OR)=6.08,95%置信区间(CI)[3.47, 10.66])。此外,VAR+BUP 优于 VAR+NRT(OR=1.66,95% CI [1.07, 2.59])和三种单药治疗(VAR、BUP 和 NRT)。在单药治疗中,VAR、BUP 和 NRT 的两两比较结果均未显示出显著差异。最后,累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)值表明,VAR+BUP 成为最佳干预措施的概率最大。

结论

VAR、BUP 和 NRT 单独使用时,戒烟成功率高于安慰剂,联合干预优于单药治疗,且 VAR 联合其他干预措施的戒烟效果更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验