• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IA1 期伴 LVSI、IA2 期)疗效的多中心非劣效性随机对照研究:LAUNCH 1 试验研究方案。

A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 1 trial.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai, 200127, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09494-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-022-09494-4
PMID:35397576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8994356/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A retrospective study and a randomized controlled trial published in a high quality journal in late 2018 have shown that laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (RH) was associated with worse survival than abdominal RH among patients with early stage cervical cancer. Radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer has been a classic landmark surgery in gynecology, therefore this conclusion is pivotal. The current trial is designed to reconfirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic RH and abdominal RH in cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2) patient survival under stringent operation standards and consistent tumor-free technique. This paper reports the rationale, design, and implementation of the trial.

METHODS

This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) controlled trial. A total of 690 patients with stage IA1 (with intravascular), and IA2 cervical cancer will be enrolled over a period of three years. Patients are randomized (1:1) to either the laparoscopic RH or the abdominal RH group. Patients will then be followed-up for at least five years. The primary endpoint will be 5-year progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints will include 5-year overall survival rates, recurrence rates, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgery-related complications, and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

The results of the trial will provide valuable evidence for guiding clinical decision of choosing appropriate treatment strategies for stage IA1 (LVSI) and stage IA2 cervical cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04934982 , Registered on 22 June 2021).

摘要

背景

2018 年末,一份发表在高质量期刊上的回顾性研究和一项随机对照试验表明,与开腹根治性子宫切除术(RH)相比,早期宫颈癌患者行腹腔镜 RH 术后生存状况更差。根治性子宫切除术一直是妇科的经典标志性手术,因此这一结论至关重要。本研究旨在严格的手术标准和一致的无瘤技术下,重新确认腹腔镜 RH 与开腹 RH 在宫颈癌(IA1 期伴脉管浸润、IA2 期)患者生存方面是否存在差异。本文报告了该试验的原理、设计和实施情况。

方法

这是一项由研究者发起的、前瞻性、随机、开放、盲终点(PROBE)对照试验。将在三年内共纳入 690 例 IA1 期(伴血管内)和 IA2 期宫颈癌患者。患者按 1:1 比例随机分为腹腔镜 RH 组或开腹 RH 组。随后对患者进行至少 5 年的随访。主要终点为 5 年无进展生存率。次要终点包括 5 年总生存率、复发率、手术时间、术中出血量、与手术相关的并发症以及生活质量。

讨论

该试验的结果将为指导临床决策,为 IA1(脉管浸润)和 IA2 期宫颈癌患者选择合适的治疗策略提供有价值的证据。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04934982,2021 年 6 月 22 日注册)。

相似文献

1
A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 1 trial.一项比较腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IA1 期伴 LVSI、IA2 期)疗效的多中心非劣效性随机对照研究:LAUNCH 1 试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09494-4.
2
A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.一项比较腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IB1、IB2 和 IIA1 期)疗效的多中心非劣效性随机对照研究:LAUNCH 2 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 8;23(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06245-5.
3
A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IB3 and IIA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 3 trial.多中心非劣效随机对照研究比较腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IB3 期和 IIA2 期)的疗效:LAUNCH 3 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 18;24(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07573-w.
4
Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopic, abdominal and gasless laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: trial protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAGCC trial).早期宫颈癌腹腔镜、开腹及免气腹腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术生存结局的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验的试验方案(LAGCC试验)
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 13;13:1287697. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1287697. eCollection 2023.
5
Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China.不同手术入路在早期宫颈癌患者临床结局和生存预后中的疗效:中国一项 III 期多中心随机对照临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e029055. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029055.
6
Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.改良根治性腹腔镜子宫切除术与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌近期临床疗效的单中心前瞻性随机对照研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun 3;21(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03044-3.
7
A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy based on open state with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.一项比较基于开腹状态的腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与早期宫颈癌患者的腹式根治性子宫切除术的 III 期随机临床试验。
Trials. 2024 Jul 11;25(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08318-z.
8
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术联合经阴道阴道残端关闭术——一项多中心分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):845-850. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388.
9
A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.一项对比腹腔镜或机器人根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌患者的III期随机临床试验。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):584-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.013.
10
Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.IAI/IA2 期宫颈癌患者行腹式、微创及联合经阴道腹腔镜子宫切除术的结局比较:4C(加拿大宫颈癌协作组)研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Aug;166(2):230-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A Minimally Invasive Treatment Approach for Early-Stage Uterine Cervical Cancer: The Impact of the LACC Trial and a Literature Review.早期子宫颈癌的微创治疗方法:LACC试验的影响及文献综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 28;61(4):620. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040620.
2
A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IB3 and IIA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 3 trial.多中心非劣效随机对照研究比较腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IB3 期和 IIA2 期)的疗效:LAUNCH 3 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 18;24(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07573-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
2
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-1914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
3
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
Improving cervical cancer survival-A multifaceted strategy to sustain progress for this global problem.
提高宫颈癌生存率——解决这一全球性问题的多方面策略。
Cancer. 2022 Dec 1;128(23):4074-4084. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34485. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer.《欧洲妇科肿瘤学会/欧洲放射肿瘤学会/欧洲病理学会宫颈癌管理指南》。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 May;28(4):641-655. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001216.
5
Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension.患者报告结局纳入临床试验方案指南:SPIRIT-PRO 扩展
JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):483-494. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21903.
6
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
7
The surgical management of cervical cancer: an overview and literature review.宫颈癌的外科治疗:综述与文献回顾
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014 Jul;69(7):426-41. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000089.
8
Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗宫颈癌:倾向评分匹配分析的长期结果
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):857-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.018. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
9
SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 声明:定义临床试验的标准议定书项目。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
10
Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌:匹配队列研究的长期生存结果。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):903-11. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr360. Epub 2011 Aug 12.