• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心非劣效随机对照研究比较腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IB3 期和 IIA2 期)的疗效:LAUNCH 3 试验研究方案。

A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IB3 and IIA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 3 trial.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, 128 Shenyang Rd 200090, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Aug 18;24(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07573-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07573-w
PMID:37592299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10436641/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is and will remain to be an important health problem in China, especially with an increasing proportion of younger patients who has more specific needs. In China, surgery to remove tumor burden followed by postoperative treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy based on clinicopathologic factors may be the best choice for stages IB3 and IIA2 patients. Radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer has been a classic landmark surgery in gynecology. The current trial is designed to evaluate whether there is a difference between laparoscopic RH and abdominal RH in cervical cancer (stages IB3 and IIA2) patient survival under stringent operation standards and consistent surgical oncologic principles. This paper reports the rationale, design, and implementation of the trial.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) controlled trial. A total of 1104 patients with stage IB3 and IIA2 cervical cancer will be enrolled over a period of 3 years. Patients are randomized (1:1) to either the laparoscopic RH or the abdominal RH group. Patients will then be followed up for at least 5 years. The primary end point will be 5-year overall survival, and secondary endpoints include 5-year progression-free survival, recurrence, and quality of life measurements.

DISCUSSION

The study results will provide more convincing evidence-based information for stages IB3 and IIA2 cervical cancer patients and their gynecologic cancer surgeons in their choice of surgical method.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04939831 , retrospectively registered on 25 June 2021.

摘要

背景

宫颈癌仍然是中国一个重要的健康问题,尤其是年轻患者比例不断增加,他们有更特殊的需求。在中国,对于 IB3 期和 IIA2 期的患者,手术切除肿瘤负荷,然后根据临床病理因素进行术后放疗和化疗,可能是最佳选择。宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术一直是妇科的经典标志性手术。本试验旨在评估在严格的手术标准和一致的外科肿瘤学原则下,腹腔镜 RH 与开腹 RH 在宫颈癌(IB3 期和 IIA2 期)患者生存方面是否存在差异。本文报告了试验的原理、设计和实施情况。

方法/设计:这是一项由研究者发起的、前瞻性的、随机的、开放性的、终点设盲(PROBE)的对照试验。将在 3 年内共纳入 1104 例 IB3 期和 IIA2 期宫颈癌患者。患者按照 1:1 随机分为腹腔镜 RH 组或开腹 RH 组。然后对患者进行至少 5 年的随访。主要终点为 5 年总生存率,次要终点包括 5 年无进展生存率、复发率和生活质量测量。

讨论

研究结果将为 IB3 期和 IIA2 期宫颈癌患者及其妇科肿瘤外科医生在选择手术方法时提供更有说服力的循证信息。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04939831,于 2021 年 6 月 25 日进行了回顾性注册。

相似文献

1
A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IB3 and IIA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 3 trial.多中心非劣效随机对照研究比较腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IB3 期和 IIA2 期)的疗效:LAUNCH 3 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Aug 18;24(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07573-w.
2
A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.一项比较腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IB1、IB2 和 IIA1 期)疗效的多中心非劣效性随机对照研究:LAUNCH 2 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 8;23(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06245-5.
3
A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 1 trial.一项比较腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IA1 期伴 LVSI、IA2 期)疗效的多中心非劣效性随机对照研究:LAUNCH 1 试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09494-4.
4
A comparison of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in patients with specific locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IB3, IIA2, IIICr): trial protocol for a randomized controlled study (C-CRAL trial).特定局部晚期宫颈癌(IB3 期、IIA2 期、IIICr 期)患者同期放化疗与根治性手术的比较:一项随机对照研究(C-CRAL 试验)的试验方案。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Sep;34(5):e64. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e64. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
5
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stages IB3 and IIA2 cervical cancer: a multicenter prospective trial.国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期 IB3 和 IIA2 期宫颈癌患者的新辅助化疗:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):1270. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10355-3.
6
Intraoperative frozen section pathology of vaginal margin in radical hysterectomy on the prognosis and quality of life for patients with IB2-IIA2 cervical cancer: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.根治性子宫切除术时阴道切缘术中冰冻切片病理对 IB2-IIA2 期宫颈癌患者预后和生活质量的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 May;35(3):e81. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e81. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
7
A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy based on open state with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.一项比较基于开腹状态的腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术与早期宫颈癌患者的腹式根治性子宫切除术的 III 期随机临床试验。
Trials. 2024 Jul 11;25(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08318-z.
8
Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助治疗宫颈癌(RACC):一项国际多中心、开放性、随机对照临床试验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jul;29(6):1072-1076. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000558. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
9
Clinical outcome of FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery due to lack of radiotherapy equipment: A retrospective comparison with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.由于缺乏放疗设备,采用新辅助化疗后行根治性手术治疗 FIGO 2018 期 IB3/IIA2 宫颈癌的临床结局:与同期放化疗的回顾性比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0266001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266001. eCollection 2022.
10
Effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation treatment on lower urinary tract symptoms after class III radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: study protocol for a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.经皮电刺激治疗对宫颈癌患者Ⅲ类根治性子宫切除术后下尿路症状的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3387-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in cervical cancer: current insights and future directions.宫颈癌的进展:当前见解与未来方向
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2025 Feb;45(2):77-109. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12629. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Nerve-Sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy (nsLRH) without Adjuvant Therapy in FIGO Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Patients: Surgical Technique and Survival Outcomes.FIGO IB3期宫颈癌患者无需辅助治疗的保留神经腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术(nsLRH):手术技术与生存结果
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;16(19):3355. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193355.

本文引用的文献

1
A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IA1 with LVSI, IA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 1 trial.一项比较腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IA1 期伴 LVSI、IA2 期)疗效的多中心非劣效性随机对照研究:LAUNCH 1 试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09494-4.
2
A multicenter non-inferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1): study protocol of the LAUNCH 2 trial.一项比较腹腔镜与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌(IB1、IB2 和 IIA1 期)疗效的多中心非劣效性随机对照研究:LAUNCH 2 试验研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Apr 8;23(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06245-5.
3
Domestic HPV vaccine price and economic returns for cervical cancer prevention in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.中国宫颈癌预防的国产 HPV 疫苗价格和经济效益:成本效果分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1335-e1344. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30277-1.
4
SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.SUCCOR 研究:一项国际欧洲队列观察性研究,比较了微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗 IB1 期宫颈癌患者的效果。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1269-1277. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
Human papillomavirus vaccine against cervical cancer: Opportunity and challenge.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗预防宫颈癌:机遇与挑战。
Cancer Lett. 2020 Feb 28;471:88-102. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.039. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
[Trend in proportion and clinicopathological characteristics of young women with stage Ⅰa2 to Ⅱa2 cervical cancer].[Ⅰa2至Ⅱa2期宫颈癌年轻女性的比例及临床病理特征趋势]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 25;54(10):666-672. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.10.004.
7
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
8
Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术的生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1905-1914. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804923. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer.《欧洲妇科肿瘤学会/欧洲放射肿瘤学会/欧洲病理学会宫颈癌管理指南》。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 May;28(4):641-655. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001216.