• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否应该将一致的遵从命令纳入最低意识状态的判定标准中?

Should Consistent Command-Following Be Added to the Criteria for Emergence From the Minimally Conscious State?

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep;103(9):1870-1873. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.010
PMID:35398046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9452458/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether consistent command-following (CCF) should be added to the diagnostic criteria for emergence from the minimally conscious state (eMCS).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=214) with acquired brain injury resulting in disorders of consciousness (DoC) admitted to a specialized rehabilitation program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Difference between time to recovery of CCF and time to recovery of functional object use (FOU) or functional communication (FC), the 2 existing criteria for eMCS as measured by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

RESULTS

Of 214 patients (median age, 53 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 34-66 years], male: 134 [62.6%], traumatic etiology: 115 [53.7%], admission CRS-R total score: 10 [IQR, 7-13]) admitted to rehabilitation without CCF, FOU, or FC, 162 (75.7%) recovered CCF and FOU or FC during the 8-week observation period. On average, recovery of CCF, FOU, and FC was observed within 1 day of one another, approximately 46 days (IQR, 38.25-58 days) post injury. One hundred and sixteen patients (71.6%) recovered FOU or FC prior to or at the same time as CCF.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients recovering from DoC, CCF reemerges around the same time as FOU and FC. This finding may reflect the shared dependency of these behaviors on cognitive processes (eg, language comprehension, attention, motor control) that are essential for effective interpersonal interaction and social participation. Our results support the addition of CCF to the existing diagnostic criteria for eMCS, but further validation in an independent sample should be conducted.

摘要

目的

确定在最小意识状态(eMCS)的诊断标准中是否应加入一致的命令遵循(CCF)。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

住院康复医院。

参与者

患有导致意识障碍(DoC)的获得性脑损伤并被专门康复计划收治的患者(N=214)。

主要观察指标

通过修订后的昏迷恢复量表(CRS-R)测量的 CCF 恢复时间与功能性物体使用(FOU)或功能性交流(FC)恢复时间之间的差异,这是 eMCS 的两个现有标准。

结果

在 214 名(中位年龄,53 岁[四分位距{IQR},34-66 岁],男性:134[62.6%],创伤性病因:115[53.7%],入院 CRS-R 总分:10[IQR,7-13])未出现 CCF、FOU 或 FC 的患者中,有 162 名(75.7%)在 8 周观察期内恢复了 CCF 和 FOU 或 FC。平均而言,CCF、FOU 和 FC 的恢复在彼此之间的 1 天内发生,大约在损伤后 46 天(IQR,38.25-58 天)。有 116 名(71.6%)患者在 CCF 之前或同时恢复了 FOU 或 FC。

结论

在从 DoC 中恢复的患者中,CCF 与 FOU 和 FC 同时重新出现。这一发现可能反映了这些行为共同依赖于认知过程(例如,语言理解、注意力、运动控制),这些过程对于有效的人际互动和社会参与至关重要。我们的结果支持将 CCF 添加到现有的 eMCS 诊断标准中,但应在独立样本中进一步验证。

相似文献

1
Should Consistent Command-Following Be Added to the Criteria for Emergence From the Minimally Conscious State?是否应该将一致的遵从命令纳入最低意识状态的判定标准中?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep;103(9):1870-1873. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Temporal Profile of Recovery of Communication in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness After Severe Brain Injury.严重脑损伤后意识障碍患者的沟通恢复的时间进程。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1260-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
3
Specialized early treatment for persons with disorders of consciousness: program components and outcomes.特殊的意识障碍患者早期治疗:项目组成部分和结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1908-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.052. Epub 2013 May 31.
4
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Coma Recovery Scale--Revised Total Score in Detection of Conscious Awareness.昏迷恢复量表修订版总分在意识觉察检测中的敏感性和特异性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Mar;97(3):490-492.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.422. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
5
Predictors of Recovering Full Consciousness: Results From a Prospective Multisite Italian Study.恢复完全意识的预测因素:一项意大利前瞻性多中心研究的结果
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Apr;32(4):e70138. doi: 10.1111/ene.70138.
6
Rationale and design of the prospective German registry of outcome in patients with severe disorders of consciousness after acute brain injury.德国急性颅脑损伤后严重意识障碍患者预后前瞻性登记研究的原理和设计。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1870-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.040. Epub 2013 May 31.
7
Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up.脑损伤后长时间意识障碍的恢复自然史:1-4 年随访后住院康复患者的结局。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73-88. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17707-5.
8
Head Control Contributes to Prediction of Emergence From the Minimally Conscious State in Children Admitted to Inpatient Rehabilitation.头部控制有助于预测入住住院康复机构的儿童从最低意识状态苏醒的情况。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Jan;105(1):20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
9
Determining the Hierarchy of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Rating Scale Categories and Alignment with Aspen Consensus Criteria for Patients with Brain Injury: A Rasch Analysis.基于 Rasch 分析探讨昏迷恢复量表修订版分级与脑损伤患者的 Aspen 共识标准的一致性。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Oct;39(19-20):1417-1428. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0095. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
10
Descriptive characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes in active duty military personnel and veterans with disorders of consciousness with combat- and noncombat-related brain injury.患有与战斗和非战斗相关脑损伤的意识障碍的现役军人和退伍军人的描述性特征和康复结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1861-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.027. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Acupuncture for arousal combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation promotes functional reorganization of brain regions in patients with a minimally conscious state: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针刺促醒联合重复经颅磁刺激促进最低意识状态患者脑区功能重组:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 4;16:1610462. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1610462. eCollection 2025.
2
Predictors of Recovering Full Consciousness: Results From a Prospective Multisite Italian Study.恢复完全意识的预测因素:一项意大利前瞻性多中心研究的结果
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Apr;32(4):e70138. doi: 10.1111/ene.70138.
3
A new ICT system coupling electromyography and coma recovery scale-revised to support the diagnostic process in disorders of consciousness.一种新的 ICT 系统结合肌电图和昏迷恢复量表修订版,以支持意识障碍的诊断过程。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 6;14(1):27008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73565-8.
4
Interpreting Change in Disorders of Consciousness Using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised.使用昏迷恢复量表修订版解读意识障碍的变化。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Aug;41(15-16):e1996-e2008. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0567. Epub 2024 May 10.
5
Disorders of Consciousness: Classification and Taxonomy.意识障碍:分类与分类学。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2024 Feb;35(1):15-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2023.06.011. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
6
Prevalence of the Minimally Conscious State Among Institutionalized Patients in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Study.荷兰住院患者中最小意识状态的流行率:一项全国性研究。
Neurology. 2023 Nov 14;101(20):e2005-e2013. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207820. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
What is a minimal clinically important difference for clinical trials in patients with disorders of consciousness? a novel probabilistic approach.对于意识障碍患者的临床试验,最小有意义临床差异是什么?一种新的概率方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0290290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290290. eCollection 2023.
8
Behavioral Assessment of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness.意识障碍患者的行为评估。
Semin Neurol. 2022 Jun;42(3):249-258. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756298. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
9
Determining the Hierarchy of Coma Recovery Scale-Revised Rating Scale Categories and Alignment with Aspen Consensus Criteria for Patients with Brain Injury: A Rasch Analysis.基于 Rasch 分析探讨昏迷恢复量表修订版分级与脑损伤患者的 Aspen 共识标准的一致性。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Oct;39(19-20):1417-1428. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0095. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive impairment, clinical symptoms and functional disability in patients emerging from the minimally conscious state.从最小意识状态中恢复的患者的认知障碍、临床症状和功能障碍。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46(1):65-74. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192860.
2
Minimally conscious state "plus": diagnostic criteria and relation to functional recovery.最小意识状态“加号”:诊断标准与功能恢复的关系。
J Neurol. 2020 May;267(5):1245-1254. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09628-y. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Practice Guideline Update Recommendations Summary: Disorders of Consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research.实践指南更新建议摘要:意识障碍:美国神经病学学会指南制定、传播和实施小组委员会;美国康复医学会;以及国家残疾、独立生活和康复研究所在此报告。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1699-1709. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Emergence from minimally conscious state: insights from evaluation of posttraumatic confusion.从最低意识状态苏醒:创伤后意识模糊评估的见解
Neurology. 2009 Oct 6;73(14):1120-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181bacf34.
6
Serial yes/no reliability after traumatic brain injury: implications regarding the operational criteria for emergence from the minimally conscious state.创伤性脑损伤后的系列是/否可靠性:关于从最小意识状态苏醒的操作标准的意义。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;79(2):216-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.127795.
7
The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility.肯尼迪昏迷恢复量表修订版:测量特征与诊断效用
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
8
The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria.最低意识状态:定义与诊断标准。
Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.3.349.
9
Prediction of functional outcomes after traumatic brain injury: a comparison of 2 measures of duration of unconsciousness.创伤性脑损伤后功能预后的预测:两种昏迷持续时间测量方法的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Oct;82(10):1355-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.26091.