Department of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sports and Sport Science, University of Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Germany.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jul 1;308:607-615. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
Depression and comorbid chronic back pain (CBP) lead to high personal and economic burden. Internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMI) might be a cost-effective adjunct to established interventions.
A health economic evaluation was embedded into an observer-blinded, multicenter RCT (societal and health care perspective). We randomly assigned participants (≥18 years) with CBP and diagnosed depression from 82 orthopedic clinics across Germany to intervention (IG + treatment as usual [TAU]) or TAU control group (CG). The IG received a guided IMI. Primary outcomes were depression response and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at 6-months follow-up. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. Incremental cost-effectiveness/cost-utility ratios (ICER/ICUR) and the probability of being cost-effective at different willingness-to-pay thresholds were calculated. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping techniques (N = 10,000).
Between October 2015 and July 2017 210 participants were randomly assigned to IG (n = 105) and CG (n = 105). Depression response did not differ significantly between groups. QALYs were significantly higher in the IG compared to the CG. Taking the societal perspective and assuming a commonly used willingness-to-pay of €34,000/QALY, the intervention's likelihood of being cost-effective was 64%.
The main limitation is that the study was powered to detect clinical but not health economic differences between groups.
The IMI is considered cost-effective (vs. CG) for individuals with depression and CBP (societal perspective). These results are promising when considering the high individual and economic burden of this patient group. Further research is needed to adequately inform political decision makers before implementation into routine care.
抑郁和合并的慢性背痛(CBP)会带来高昂的个人和经济负担。基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施(IMI)可能是对现有干预措施的一种具有成本效益的补充。
一项健康经济学评价被纳入一项观察者盲法、多中心 RCT 中(从社会和医疗保健角度)。我们随机分配了来自德国 82 家骨科诊所的 CBP 和诊断为抑郁症的患者(≥18 岁)到干预组(IG+常规治疗[TAU])或 TAU 对照组(CG)。IG 接受了指导的 IMI。主要结局是 6 个月随访时的抑郁反应和质量调整生命年(QALYs)。使用多重插补法处理缺失数据。计算了增量成本效益/成本效用比(ICER/ICUR)和在不同意愿支付阈值下具有成本效益的概率。使用自举技术(N=10,000)估计统计不确定性。
2015 年 10 月至 2017 年 7 月期间,210 名参与者被随机分配到 IG(n=105)和 CG(n=105)。两组之间的抑郁反应没有显著差异。IG 组的 QALYs 显著高于 CG 组。从社会角度考虑,并假设常用的意愿支付为 34,000 欧元/QALY,干预措施具有成本效益的可能性为 64%。
主要限制是该研究旨在检测组间的临床而非健康经济学差异。
对于患有抑郁和 CBP 的个体(社会角度),IMI 被认为具有成本效益(与 CG 相比)。考虑到该患者群体的个人和经济负担较高,这些结果很有希望。在将其纳入常规护理之前,需要进一步研究为决策者提供充分的信息。