Evaluating enrollment and outcome criteria in trials of biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

OBJECTIVE

Treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) generally involves intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and saline irrigation, followed by short courses of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) or surgery with postoperative medical therapy for patients who do not respond to INCS. However, both SCS use and surgery are associated with a range of adverse effects or complications, have a high recurrence rate, and are unsuitable for some patients. Biologics targeting the underlying pathophysiology are promising treatment alternatives for these patients. Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab are approved for use in patients with severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP. However, the lack of a consistent definition of severe CRSwNP makes the decision to initiate biologic treatment particularly complex. Furthermore, the position of each biologic in the overall management of CRSwNP remains to be clarified.

DATA SOURCES

Publications reporting results of phase III trials of dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab in the treatment of CRSwNP.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Randomized, controlled phase III trials of biologics approved for CRSwNP.

RESULTS

These trials all used different enrollment criteria. We discuss the complexities of assessing CRSwNP disease severity and highlight how these impact comparisons of the populations and outcomes of the phase III biologic trials.

CONCLUSION

To position biologic agents appropriately within the existing CRSwNP treatment paradigm, future trials will need to include comparable patient populations and standardized outcome measures. Such trials will help to ensure that biologic treatment is targeted appropriately to support optimal clinical outcomes.