• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Biologics: A Call for Better Data Standardisation and Presentation in Clinical Studies.伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎与生物制剂:呼吁临床研究中更好的数据标准化和呈现方式
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jan 7;21:27-34. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S467250. eCollection 2025.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Comparative short-term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta-analysis.内镜鼻窦手术与生物疗法治疗鼻息肉慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的短期疗效比较:网状Meta分析
Clin Transl Allergy. 2023 Jun;13(6):e12269. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12269.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
9
Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis.用于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的生物制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD013513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013513.pub2.
10
Systematic literature review of the epidemiology and clinical burden of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.慢性鼻息肉鼻窦炎的流行病学和临床负担的系统文献综述。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Nov;36(11):1897-1911. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1815682. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
[Diagnosis and drug therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis].[慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的诊断与药物治疗]
HNO. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s00106-025-01635-y.
2
The Role of KI67 in Predicting Post-ESS (Endoscopic Sinus Surgery) Outcomes in CRSwNP (Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps).KI67在预测慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)术后结局中的作用
Cureus. 2025 Feb 27;17(2):e79748. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79748. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Biologic treatment for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物治疗重度慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rhinology. 2023 Apr 1;61(2):98-107. doi: 10.4193/Rhin22.412.
2
Evaluating enrollment and outcome criteria in trials of biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.评估生物制剂治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉临床试验的入组和结局标准。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Aug;129(2):160-168. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
A meta-analysis study of the robustness and universality of gut microbiome-metabolome associations.肠道微生物组-代谢组关联的稳健性和普遍性的荟萃分析研究。
Microbiome. 2021 Oct 12;9(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01149-z.
4
Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.贝那鲁肽治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效和安全性:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Apr;149(4):1309-1317.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.08.030. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies and aspirin desensitization for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉中单抗药物和阿司匹林脱敏治疗的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Apr;149(4):1286-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
6
Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (SYNAPSE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.美泊利单抗治疗伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(SYNAPSE):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):1141-1153. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00097-7. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
7
Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis.生物制剂治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 12;3(3):CD013513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013513.pub3.
8
Benralizumab effect on severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP): A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.贝那鲁肽治疗伴有鼻息肉的重度慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRSwNP)的随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 Jun;51(6):836-844. doi: 10.1111/cea.13852. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
9
Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in nasal polyposis: 2 randomized phase 3 trials.奥马珠单抗治疗鼻息肉的疗效和安全性:两项随机 3 期临床试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Sep;146(3):595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.05.032. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
10
Endotypes of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Pathology and Possible Therapeutic Implications.伴有鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的内型:病理学及可能的治疗意义
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 May;8(5):1514-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎与生物制剂:呼吁临床研究中更好的数据标准化和呈现方式

Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Biologics: A Call for Better Data Standardisation and Presentation in Clinical Studies.

作者信息

Kariyawasam Harsha Hemantha, Langan Dean, Rimmer Joanne

机构信息

Specialist Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Royal National ENT Hospital, London, UK.

Rhinology Section, Royal National ENT Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jan 7;21:27-34. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S467250. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S467250
PMID:39802956
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11724617/
Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is often severe, debilitating and difficult to treat. Recent randomised control trials (RCTs) of biologics that target key inflammatory pathways have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating CRSwNP. Such RCTs must facilitate meta-analysis. Here we report the need for urgent improvement in double-blind randomised controlled trials of biologics in CRSwNP, having previously undertaken a systematic review and meta-analysis of such studies. The RCTs included in that systematic review did not conform to a standard study design. Patient selection criteria was not consistent in studies with several heterogeneous disease subgroups of CRSwNP patients present in each study. Different durations of treatment and variable outcome measures also made the comparative assessment of efficacy between different biologics difficult. Data presentation to allow extraction for meta-analysis was not always clear, such that on occasion selected data sets or even an entire RCT had to be excluded from further evaluation. As such, the high heterogeneity between studies made the overall interpretation of the findings difficult. We make an urgent call to design and conduct future RCTS of biologics in CRSwNP in a more standardised manner, and to present data in a clear way that is easily extractable. This will facilitate more inclusive and thus robust evaluation and interpretation via meta-analysis, which will in turn enable clearer insight into which CRSwNP patient subgroups might benefit from specific biologics and thus achieve better clinical outcomes.

摘要

伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRSwNP)通常病情严重、使人虚弱且难以治疗。近期针对关键炎症通路的生物制剂随机对照试验(RCT)已证明在治疗CRSwNP方面具有临床疗效。此类RCT必须便于进行荟萃分析。在此,我们报告在对生物制剂治疗CRSwNP的双盲随机对照试验中迫切需要改进,此前我们已对此类研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入该系统评价的RCT不符合标准研究设计。在每个研究中存在多个CRSwNP患者异质性疾病亚组的研究中,患者选择标准不一致。不同的治疗持续时间和可变的结局测量方法也使得不同生物制剂之间疗效的比较评估变得困难。用于荟萃分析的数据呈现并不总是清晰,以至于有时不得不排除选定的数据集甚至整个RCT进行进一步评估。因此,研究之间的高度异质性使得研究结果的整体解释变得困难。我们紧急呼吁以更标准化的方式设计和开展未来生物制剂治疗CRSwNP的RCT,并以清晰且易于提取的方式呈现数据。这将有助于通过荟萃分析进行更全面从而更可靠的评估和解释,进而能够更清楚地了解哪些CRSwNP患者亚组可能从特定生物制剂中获益,从而实现更好的临床结局。