Kariyawasam Harsha Hemantha, Langan Dean, Rimmer Joanne
Specialist Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Royal National ENT Hospital, London, UK.
Rhinology Section, Royal National ENT Hospital, London, UK.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jan 7;21:27-34. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S467250. eCollection 2025.
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is often severe, debilitating and difficult to treat. Recent randomised control trials (RCTs) of biologics that target key inflammatory pathways have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating CRSwNP. Such RCTs must facilitate meta-analysis. Here we report the need for urgent improvement in double-blind randomised controlled trials of biologics in CRSwNP, having previously undertaken a systematic review and meta-analysis of such studies. The RCTs included in that systematic review did not conform to a standard study design. Patient selection criteria was not consistent in studies with several heterogeneous disease subgroups of CRSwNP patients present in each study. Different durations of treatment and variable outcome measures also made the comparative assessment of efficacy between different biologics difficult. Data presentation to allow extraction for meta-analysis was not always clear, such that on occasion selected data sets or even an entire RCT had to be excluded from further evaluation. As such, the high heterogeneity between studies made the overall interpretation of the findings difficult. We make an urgent call to design and conduct future RCTS of biologics in CRSwNP in a more standardised manner, and to present data in a clear way that is easily extractable. This will facilitate more inclusive and thus robust evaluation and interpretation via meta-analysis, which will in turn enable clearer insight into which CRSwNP patient subgroups might benefit from specific biologics and thus achieve better clinical outcomes.
伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRSwNP)通常病情严重、使人虚弱且难以治疗。近期针对关键炎症通路的生物制剂随机对照试验(RCT)已证明在治疗CRSwNP方面具有临床疗效。此类RCT必须便于进行荟萃分析。在此,我们报告在对生物制剂治疗CRSwNP的双盲随机对照试验中迫切需要改进,此前我们已对此类研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入该系统评价的RCT不符合标准研究设计。在每个研究中存在多个CRSwNP患者异质性疾病亚组的研究中,患者选择标准不一致。不同的治疗持续时间和可变的结局测量方法也使得不同生物制剂之间疗效的比较评估变得困难。用于荟萃分析的数据呈现并不总是清晰,以至于有时不得不排除选定的数据集甚至整个RCT进行进一步评估。因此,研究之间的高度异质性使得研究结果的整体解释变得困难。我们紧急呼吁以更标准化的方式设计和开展未来生物制剂治疗CRSwNP的RCT,并以清晰且易于提取的方式呈现数据。这将有助于通过荟萃分析进行更全面从而更可靠的评估和解释,进而能够更清楚地了解哪些CRSwNP患者亚组可能从特定生物制剂中获益,从而实现更好的临床结局。