Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Köyceğiz Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Health Care Services, Muğla, Turkey.
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jul;163:e396-e412. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.143. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
The aim of the study was to review the effect of exercise interventions in patients after lumbar fusion surgery. It was sought to reveal the effect of exercise protocols on various clinical parameters.
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were searched. "Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (ROB 2)" and "The Tool for the assEssment of Study qualiTy and reporting in EXercise (TESTEX)" were used to evaluate the bias risk and quality assessment, respectively.
A literature search yielded 1595 studies. After the procedures, eight and three studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. TESTEX scores of the studies ranged from 4 to 10 (median: 7.50). The majority (n = 5) of the studies' bias risk was classified as "some concerns" in ROB 2. The superiority of trunk-stabilization training was controlled in two studies. The most focused (n = 3) intervention was cognitive therapy plus exercise. Evidence proved that cognitive therapy plus exercise intervention was not superior to only exercise therapy on long-term pain (effect size [ES]: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.44 to 1.47) and quality-of-life (ES: 1.34, 95% CI: -4.12 to 1.13) level. On the other hand, low-quality evidence demonstrated that cognitive therapy plus exercise yielded better results on long-term disability (ES: 0.78, 95% CI: -0.27 to 2.78) and kinesiophobia (ES: 0.14, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.67).
The systematic review results demonstrated that cognitive therapy or consultation during the exercise program provides better outcomes in lumbar fusion surgery over exercise alone. Positive effects of core stabilization training on muscle strength and endurance were observed in the short term; however, this superiority was not the case in long-term studies. Meta-analysis results proved the positive effect of additional cognitive therapy to exercise on disability and kinesiophobia.
本研究旨在综述腰椎融合术后患者行运动干预的效果。旨在揭示运动方案对各种临床参数的影响。
检索 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 ScienceDirect 数据库。采用“改良 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(随机对照试验)(ROB 2)”和“运动评估研究质量和报告工具(TESTEX)”分别进行偏倚风险评估和质量评估。
文献检索得到 1595 项研究。经过筛选,系统评价和荟萃分析分别纳入 8 项和 3 项研究。TESTEX 评分范围为 4 分至 10 分(中位数:7.50 分)。ROB 2 中,大多数(n=5)研究的偏倚风险被归类为“存在一些关注”。有 2 项研究控制了躯干稳定性训练的优越性。干预措施中最集中(n=3)的是认知疗法加运动。有证据表明,认知疗法加运动干预与单纯运动疗法相比,在长期疼痛(效应量[ES]:0.48,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.44 至 1.47)和生活质量(ES:1.34,95%CI:-4.12 至 1.13)水平上并无优势。另一方面,低质量证据表明,认知疗法加运动在长期残疾(ES:0.78,95%CI:-0.27 至 2.78)和运动恐惧(ES:0.14,95%CI:1.10 至 1.67)方面的结果更好。
系统评价结果表明,与单纯运动相比,腰椎融合术后运动方案中加入认知疗法或咨询可获得更好的效果。短期核心稳定性训练对肌肉力量和耐力有积极影响,但长期研究则不然。荟萃分析结果证明,运动中增加认知疗法对残疾和运动恐惧有积极影响。