Scandelli Francesco, De Leo Davide, Marino Giorgia, De Martino Emanuela, Cannizzaro Delia, Adamo Paola, Temporiti Federico
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Physiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 28;13(23):7246. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237246.
Supervised rehabilitation has been reported to improve motor and functional outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. However, the effects of supervised rehabilitation on psychosocial and participation-related outcomes are still debated. This study aimed to systematically review the effects of supervised rehabilitation on psychosocial and participation-related outcomes in patients after lumbar spine surgery. : A systematic literature search was carried out using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases from inception to March 2024. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of supervised rehabilitation on psychosocial and participation-related outcomes after lumbar spine surgery were included. Methodological quality was assessed through the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. Pooled effects were reported as the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) or reported qualitatively in the presence of clinical heterogeneity. The certainty of the evidence was rated through the GRADE approach. : Fifteen studies (1297 patients) were included. Very low evidence supported supervised rehabilitation to improve quality of life at 1 year (SMD: -0.28; CI from -0.49 to -0.07, I = 32%), while low evidence supported supervised rehabilitation to enhance self-efficacy at 6 months (SMD: -1.13; CI from -1.54 to -0.72) and 1 year (SMD -1.03, CI from -1.43 to -0.63). No effects of supervised rehabilitation were found on quality of life at 6 months or in terms of fear-avoidance belief, catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and return to work at 6 months and 1 year (very low to low evidence certainty). : Supervised rehabilitation improved quality of life and self-efficacy in patients after lumbar spine surgery. However, the certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to low, and further studies are needed.
据报道,有监督的康复训练可改善腰椎手术后的运动和功能预后。然而,有监督的康复训练对心理社会和参与相关预后的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在系统评价有监督的康复训练对腰椎手术后患者心理社会和参与相关预后的影响。:从数据库建立至2024年3月,使用PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、PEDro、CENTRAL和谷歌学术数据库进行了系统的文献检索。纳入了调查有监督的康复训练对腰椎手术后心理社会和参与相关预后影响的随机对照试验。通过修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量。汇总效应报告为标准化均数差(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI),或在存在临床异质性时进行定性报告。通过GRADE方法对证据的确定性进行评级。:纳入了15项研究(1297例患者)。极低质量的证据支持有监督的康复训练可改善1年时的生活质量(SMD:-0.28;CI为-0.49至-0.07,I² = 32%),而低质量的证据支持有监督的康复训练可提高6个月时(SMD:-1.13;CI为-1.54至-0.72)和1年时(SMD -1.03,CI为-1.43至-0.63)的自我效能感。未发现有监督的康复训练对6个月时的生活质量或对恐惧回避信念、灾难化、焦虑、抑郁以及6个月和1年时重返工作方面有影响(证据确定性为极低至低)。:有监督的康复训练改善了腰椎手术后患者的生活质量和自我效能感。然而,证据的确定性为极低至低,需要进一步研究。