Suppr超能文献

不稳定坐姿下平衡控制在急性腰痛个体中的研究。

Balance control in unstable sitting in individuals with an acute episode of low back pain.

机构信息

The University of Queensland, NHMRC Centre of Clinical Research Excellence in Spinal Pain, Injury and Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Australia.

Department of Physiotherapy, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, Differdange, Luxembourg; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2022 Jun;95:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is associated with altered postural control, mostly observed at later stages in the LBP trajectory. It is unclear whether postural control differs in the acute phase of LBP.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is postural control different in the acute phase of LBP (<2 weeks) and do differences depend on pain intensity, psychological features and/or availability of vision to control posture?

METHODS

Cross-sectional study design. An unstable sitting paradigm (to reduce the contribution of the legs) assessed postural control of participants with acute LBP (n = 133) and pain-free controls (n = 74). Centre of pressure (CoP) reflected seat movements. Participants balanced with eyes closed, open, or with visual feedback of the anteroposterior CoP position. Balance performance was expressed by CoP displacement and velocity, and stabilogram diffusion analysis. Generalised estimating equations (GEEs) including body mass index, sex, and safety bar touch, tested differences between groups and between balance conditions. Separate GEEs were used to model performance measures and bar touch (yes/no) including pain intensity, disability and psychological features.

RESULTS

CoP displacement and critical point coordinates (time and distance where CoP diffusion rate or spread slows) were larger in LBP than pain-free controls independent of balance condition. Long-term diffusion rate was greater in LBP than controls with eyes closed. CoP velocity measures (RMS, short term diffusion rate) were not different between groups. Pain intensity and psychological features were not linearly related to balance performance in participants with acute LBP. Higher pain catastrophizing was associated with touching the safety bar.

SIGNIFICANCE

Postural control differs in acute LBP than pain-free controls. Findings might be explained by altered sensory processing, lesser ability to reweight proprioceptive information and/or less accurate trunk muscle control. Although not linearly related to pain-intensity or psychological features in the acute stage, reduced balance performance could potentially have impact on LBP recovery.

摘要

背景

下腰痛(LBP)与姿势控制改变有关,主要在 LBP 病程的后期阶段观察到。目前尚不清楚 LBP 的急性期是否存在姿势控制差异。

研究问题

LBP 急性发作期(<2 周)的姿势控制是否不同,差异是否取决于疼痛强度、心理特征和/或姿势控制时视觉的可用性?

方法

横断面研究设计。使用不稳定坐姿范式(减少腿部贡献)评估急性 LBP 患者(n=133)和无疼痛对照者(n=74)的姿势控制。压力中心(CoP)反映座椅运动。参与者闭眼、睁眼或通过 CoP 前后位置的视觉反馈进行平衡。平衡性能通过 CoP 位移和速度以及稳定图扩散分析来表示。广义估计方程(GEE)包括体重指数、性别和安全杆触摸,用于测试组间和平衡条件间的差异。单独的 GEE 用于建模性能指标和杆触摸(是/否),包括疼痛强度、残疾和心理特征。

结果

无论平衡条件如何,LBP 患者的 CoP 位移和关键点坐标(CoP 扩散率或扩展速度减慢的时间和距离)均大于无疼痛对照组。闭眼时,LBP 患者的长期扩散率大于对照组。CoP 速度测量值(RMS、短期扩散率)在两组之间无差异。疼痛强度和心理特征与急性 LBP 患者的平衡性能无线性关系。较高的疼痛灾难化与接触安全杆有关。

意义

急性 LBP 患者的姿势控制与无疼痛对照组不同。这些发现可能是由于感觉处理改变、重新加权本体感受信息的能力降低和/或躯干肌肉控制不准确所致。尽管在急性阶段与疼痛强度或心理特征没有线性关系,但平衡性能降低可能对 LBP 恢复有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验