Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 1;35(7):812-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bb81a8.
A cross-sectional study comparing subjects with self-reported low back pain, recent low back, and no low back pain.
To determine differences in trunk postural control between groups.
Poor postural control has been demonstrated in patients with low back pain, but the cause of this is unknown.
A total of 331 participants of a longitudinal study participated in a seated balancing task. Based on a questionnaire, subjects were subdivided in 3 groups: current-LBP, recent-LBP (last 12 months), no-LBP. Subjects balanced on a seat mounted over a hemisphere during three 30-second trials. Sway amplitudes (RMS), mean power frequency (MPF), short-term diffusion coefficients (DS), and critical point (CP) coordinates of sway were calculated.
RMS values differed significantly between groups, with smaller values in recent-LBP than in no-LBP. MPF values were lowest in current-LBP. DS values were highest in no-LBP, with significant differences between this group and recent-LBP only. CP values were generally lower for recent-LBP than both other groups.
In contrast with previous findings, postural sway amplitudes in unstable sitting were not different between LBP and healthy subjects, while subjects with a recent history of LBP showed smaller amplitudes. Higher DS values in subjects without LBP indicated more stochastic sway. These findings may be explained by the disturbing effect of current pain on postural control causing low sway frequencies and by lower effort in balancing in healthy subjects causing high sway amplitudes and diffusion coefficients.
一项横断面研究比较了自述腰痛、近期腰痛和无腰痛的受试者。
确定各组间躯干姿势控制的差异。
腰痛患者的姿势控制较差,但原因尚不清楚。
共有 331 名纵向研究的参与者参加了坐姿平衡任务。根据问卷,将受试者分为 3 组:当前腰痛组、近期腰痛组(过去 12 个月)、无腰痛组。受试者在半球上安装的座椅上平衡,进行三次 30 秒的试验。计算摇摆幅度(RMS)、平均功率频率(MPF)、短期扩散系数(DS)和摇摆的临界点(CP)坐标。
RMS 值在各组之间存在显著差异,近期腰痛组的值小于无腰痛组。MPF 值在当前腰痛组中最低。DS 值在无腰痛组中最高,与近期腰痛组有显著差异。CP 值通常在近期腰痛组中低于其他两组。
与先前的发现相反,不稳定坐姿下的姿势摆动幅度在腰痛和健康受试者之间没有差异,而近期腰痛史的受试者摆动幅度较小。无腰痛受试者的 DS 值较高表明摆动更随机。这些发现可能是由于当前疼痛对姿势控制的干扰导致低摆动频率,以及健康受试者在平衡时的低努力导致高摆动幅度和扩散系数造成的。