Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术后子宫收缩痛应用程控间歇性硬膜外推注与持续硬膜外输注镇痛的随机双盲临床试验

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus in Comparison with Continuous Epidural Infusion for Uterine Contraction Pain Relief After Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Department of Medical Records, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Apr 2;16:999-1009. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S350418. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) was reported to provide superior maintenance of labour analgesia with better pain relief and less motor block than continuous epidural infusion (CEI). Whether this is also evident for uterine contraction pain relief after cesarean section remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Parturients scheduled for cesarean section were recruited for the study. At the end of the surgery, after a similar epidural loading dose given, patients received either PIEB (6 mL·h) or CEI (6 mL·h) of 0.1% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the uterine contraction pain assessed with visual analog scale (VAS-U) at the postoperative 36 h. Secondary outcomes included incision pain at the rest (VAS-R) and in the movement-evoked (VAS-P), and lower extremity motor block (defined as Bromage score > 0). The whole profile of VAS scores between groups was analyzed using linear mixed model. When significant differences were found, the pairwise comparison was done with the Mann Whitney -test followed by Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty parturients were studied (PIEB, 60; CEI, 60). VAS-U at the postoperative 36 h in the PIEB group was lower than in the CEI group (Bonferroni-adjusted < 0.01). The linear mixed model indicated that VAS-U, VAS-R and VAS-P were lower in the PIEB group compared with the CEI group (all < 0.01). Motor block was higher in the CEI group than in the PIEB group during the study period except 2 h (all < 0.05). No differences of adverse events such as hypotension and urinary retention were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus provides more effective uterine contraction and incision pain relief and less motor block after cesarean section than continuous epidural infusion without an increased risk of urinary retention and blood pressure instability.

摘要

目的

与持续硬膜外输注(CEI)相比,程控间歇性硬膜外推注(PIEB)在提供更好的分娩镇痛维持方面表现出更好的镇痛效果和更少的运动阻滞。但剖宫产术后子宫收缩痛缓解方面是否也如此,目前尚不清楚。

患者和方法

本研究纳入了计划行剖宫产的产妇。手术结束时,在给予相似的硬膜外负荷剂量后,患者接受 PIEB(6 mL·h)或 CEI(6 mL·h)输注 0.1%罗哌卡因。主要结局是术后 36 小时用视觉模拟评分法(VAS-U)评估的子宫收缩痛。次要结局包括静息时(VAS-R)和运动时(VAS-P)的切口痛,以及下肢运动阻滞(定义为 Bromage 评分>0)。采用线性混合模型分析两组间 VAS 评分的全貌。当发现差异有统计学意义时,采用 Mann Whitney 检验进行两两比较,并用 Bonferroni 校正。

结果

本研究共纳入 120 例产妇(PIEB 组 60 例,CEI 组 60 例)。PIEB 组术后 36 小时的 VAS-U 低于 CEI 组(Bonferroni 校正 < 0.01)。线性混合模型表明,与 CEI 组相比,PIEB 组的 VAS-U、VAS-R 和 VAS-P 均较低(均 < 0.01)。在研究期间,CEI 组的运动阻滞高于 PIEB 组,但在 2 小时时除外(均 < 0.05)。两组间未观察到低血压和尿潴留等不良事件的差异。

结论

与 CEI 相比,PIEB 用于剖宫产术后可提供更有效的子宫收缩和切口痛缓解,同时运动阻滞更少,且不增加尿潴留和血压不稳定的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89da/8985825/cafaba593ce7/DDDT-16-999-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验