Suppr超能文献

海洋原生浮游生物和混合浮游生物的热适应与驯化

Thermal Acclimation and Adaptation in Marine Protozooplankton and Mixoplankton.

作者信息

Calbet Albert, Saiz Enric

机构信息

Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2022 Mar 23;13:832810. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.832810. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Proper thermal adaptation is key to understanding how species respond to long-term changes in temperature. However, this is seldom considered in protozooplankton and mixoplankton experiments. In this work, we studied how two heterotrophic dinoflagellates ( and ), one heterotrophic ciliate (), and one mixotrophic dinoflagellate () responded to warming. To do so, we compared strains adapted at 16, 19, and 22°C and those adapted at 16°C and exposed for 3 days to temperature increases of 3 and 6°C (acclimated treatments). Neither their carbon, nitrogen or phosphorus (CNP) contents nor their corresponding elemental ratios showed straightforward changes with temperature, except for a modest increase in P contents with temperature in some grazers. In general, the performance of both acclimated and adapted grazers increased from 16 to 19°C and then dropped at 22°C, with a few exceptions. Therefore, our organisms followed the "hotter is better" hypothesis for a temperature rise of 3°C; an increase of >6°C, however, resulted in variable outcomes. Despite the disparity in responses among species and physiological rates, 19°C-adapted organisms, in general, performed better than acclimated-only (16°C-adapted organisms incubated at +3°C). However, at 22°C, most species were at the limit of their metabolic equilibrium and were unable to fully adapt. Nevertheless, adaptation to higher temperatures allowed strains to maintain physiological activities when exposed to sudden increases in temperature (up to 25°C). In summary, adaptation to temperature seems to confer a selective advantage to protistan grazers within a narrow range (i.e., ca. 3°C). Adaptation to much higher increases of temperatures (i.e., +6°C) does not confer any clear physiological advantage (with few exceptions; e.g., the mixotroph ), at least within the time frame of our experiments.

摘要

适当的热适应是理解物种如何应对温度长期变化的关键。然而,原生浮游动物和混合浮游生物实验很少考虑这一点。在这项研究中,我们研究了两种异养甲藻(和)、一种异养纤毛虫()和一种兼养甲藻()对升温的反应。为此,我们比较了适应16、19和22°C的菌株,以及适应16°C并暴露于3°C和6°C温度升高3天的菌株(驯化处理)。除了一些食草动物的磷含量随温度适度增加外,它们的碳、氮或磷(CNP)含量及其相应的元素比率均未随温度呈现直接变化。一般来说,驯化和适应的食草动物的性能从16°C增加到19°C,然后在22°C时下降,有一些例外情况。因此,我们的生物遵循“越热越好”的假设,温度升高3°C;然而,超过6°C的升高会导致不同的结果。尽管物种和生理速率之间的反应存在差异,但一般来说,适应19°C的生物比仅驯化的(在+3°C下培养的适应16°C的生物)表现更好。然而,在22°C时,大多数物种处于其代谢平衡的极限,无法完全适应。尽管如此,适应更高温度使菌株在暴露于温度突然升高(高达25°C)时能够维持生理活动。总之,对温度的适应似乎在狭窄范围内(即约3°C)赋予原生食草动物选择性优势。至少在我们实验的时间范围内,适应更高温度的升高(即+6°C)不会带来任何明显的生理优势(有少数例外;例如,兼养生物)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e83/8984466/77dda07c126f/fmicb-13-832810-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验