Haffer Henryk, Bender Alwina, Krump Alexander, Hardt Sebastian, Winkler Tobias, Damm Philipp
Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Mar 24;10:857682. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.857682. eCollection 2022.
Training with gym machines is one of the most popular physical activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, to date, there are no evidence-based recommendations for physical activity after THA, worldwide. The aim of the study is to evaluate the hip joint loads during exercises on four widely used gym machines in order to provide a source for an evidence-based patient counselling for arthroplasty surgeons. The hip joint loads in seven patients (59.6 ± 6.4 years, 28.6 ± 2.1 kg/m) with instrumented hip implants were assessed. The resulting force (F), bending moment (M), and torsional moment (M) were evaluated during the training on leg curl/leg extension machines (loads: 20, 30, and 40 kg), leg press machine [backrest: 10°, 30°, and 60°; load: 50, 75, and 100%BW (bodyweight)], and a rope pull machine (abduction/adduction/flexion/extension; each ipsi- and contralateral; load 10 kg). These loads were compared with the loads during walking on treadmill at 4 km/h (median peak values: F 303%BW, M 4.25%BWm, and M 2.70%BWm). In each of the four performed exercises with a total of 23 different load conditions or exercise modes analyzed, a significantly lower or not different load was detected with respect to F, M, and M measured while walking with 4 km/h. Nevertheless, F and M demonstrated a trend to increased loading during the ipsilateral monopod standing rope pull exercises hip flexion, extension, and abduction. Based on our investigation, we assume that the investigated gym machines and external loads can be considered mainly as low-impact sports (with some exceptions) and thus as safe physical activity after THA. Due to the fact that the examinations were conducted in the mean 17.4 months after THA, the applicability of the results to the immediate postoperative period is limited.
使用健身器械进行训练是全髋关节置换术(THA)后最受欢迎的体育活动之一。然而,迄今为止,全球范围内尚无基于证据的THA后体育活动建议。本研究的目的是评估在四种广泛使用的健身器械上进行锻炼时的髋关节负荷,以便为关节置换外科医生提供基于证据的患者咨询依据。评估了7例植入有仪器化髋关节假体的患者(年龄59.6±6.4岁,体重指数28.6±2.1kg/m²)的髋关节负荷。在腿弯举/腿伸展器械(负荷:20、30和40kg)、腿推器械[靠背角度:10°、30°和60°;负荷:50%、75%和100%体重(BW)]以及绳索拉力器械(外展/内收/屈曲/伸展;左右侧均有;负荷10kg)上进行训练时,对产生的力(F)、弯矩(M)和扭矩(T)进行了评估。将这些负荷与以4km/h的速度在跑步机上行走时的负荷进行比较(中位峰值:F为303%体重,M为4.25%体重·米,T为2.70%体重·米)。在总共分析的23种不同负荷条件或运动模式的四项锻炼中,相对于以4km/h行走时测得的F、M和T,检测到的负荷显著更低或无差异。然而,在同侧单腿站立绳索拉力锻炼髋关节屈曲、伸展和外展过程中,F和M显示出负荷增加的趋势。基于我们的调查,我们认为所研究的健身器械和外部负荷主要可被视为低冲击力运动(有一些例外情况),因此是THA后安全的体育活动。由于检查是在THA后平均17.4个月进行的,因此这些结果在术后即刻的适用性有限。