Doyen Denis, Morand Lucas, Jozwiak Mathieu, Aurenche Mateu Didac, Saccheri Clément, Hyvernat Hervé, Cremoni Marion, Brglez Vesna, Bèle Nicolas, Bernardin Gilles, Seitz-Polski Barbara, Dellamonica Jean
Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital Archet 1, Nice, France.
UR2CA - Unité de Recherche Clinique Côte d'Azur, Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Nice, France.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 25;9:824563. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.824563. eCollection 2022.
The optimal isolation time of COVID-19 patients in intensive care unit (ICU) is debated. We investigated the impact of two different COVID-19 patient isolation time strategies on healthcare workers (HCW) contamination, intensity of nursing care and potential associated adverse events.
We prospectively included all consecutive COVID-19 patients and HCW in our ICU in the first two pandemic waves (March to May 2020 and August to November 2020). Specific isolation measures for COVID-19 patients were released after two negative RT-PCR assays in the first wave and 14 days after the onset of symptoms in the second wave. Contamination of HCW was assessed at the end of each pandemic wave by combining both a RT-PCR assay and a serological test.
Overall, 117 COVID-19 patients and 73 HCW were included. Despite an earlier release from isolation after ICU admission in the second than in the first wave [6 (4-8) vs. 15 (11-19) days, < 0.01], the proportion of HCW with a positive serological test (16 vs. 17%, = 0.94) or with a positive RT-PCR assay (3 vs. 5%, = 0.58) was not different between the two waves. Although a lower nurse-to-bed ratio, the intensity of nursing care was higher in the second than in the first wave. A longer isolation time was associated with accidental extubation (OR = 1.18, 95%CI:1.07-1.35, = 0.005) but neither with ventilator-associated pneumonia nor with dysglycemia.
A shorter isolation time of COVID-19 patients in ICU was not associated with higher HCW contamination, while a longer isolation time seemed to be associated with higher accidental extubation.
新冠病毒病(COVID-19)患者在重症监护病房(ICU)的最佳隔离时间存在争议。我们研究了两种不同的COVID-19患者隔离时间策略对医护人员污染、护理强度以及潜在相关不良事件的影响。
在头两波疫情期间(2020年3月至5月和2020年8月至11月),我们前瞻性纳入了ICU中所有连续的COVID-19患者和医护人员。第一波疫情中,COVID-19患者在两次逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测呈阴性后解除特定隔离措施;第二波疫情中,在症状出现14天后解除。在每波疫情结束时,通过结合RT-PCR检测和血清学检测评估医护人员的污染情况。
总体而言,共纳入117例COVID-19患者和73名医护人员。尽管第二波疫情中患者入住ICU后隔离解除时间早于第一波[6(4-8)天对15(11-19)天,<0.01],但两波疫情中血清学检测呈阳性的医护人员比例(16%对17%,=0.94)或RT-PCR检测呈阳性的医护人员比例(3%对5%,=0.58)并无差异。尽管护士与床位比例较低,但第二波疫情中的护理强度高于第一波。隔离时间较长与意外拔管相关(比值比=1.18,95%置信区间:1.07-1.35,=0.005),但与呼吸机相关性肺炎或血糖异常均无关。
ICU中COVID-19患者较短的隔离时间与医护人员较高的污染率无关,而较长的隔离时间似乎与较高的意外拔管率相关。