Suppr超能文献

眼前节光学相干断层扫描在检测房角平坦中的诊断性能。

Diagnostic performance of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in detecting plateau iris.

机构信息

Ophthalmology, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Ophthalmology, Rangsit University College of Medicine, Mueang Pathum Thani, Thailand.

出版信息

BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 23;7(1):e000931. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000931. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of manual grading of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in detection of plateau iris configuration (PIC) based on the presence of standardised ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) criteria in at least two quadrants; namely, clinical diagnosis of PIC (DxPIC).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In this cross-sectional study, paired AS-OCT and UBM images were evaluated by three glaucoma specialists. AS-OCT was classified into two mechanisms, PIC versus non-PIC, of primary angle closure disease (PACD) and AS-OCT-PIC diagnostic performance was tested with DxPIC.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-nine eyes of 142 patients were enrolled for analysis, and DxPIC was found in 85 eyes (47.49%). Intraobserver agreement rates of AS-OCT classification by the graders were 0.77, 0.701 and 0.742 (all p<0.001), and interobserver agreement rates, between a senior glaucoma specialist and the other two glaucoma specialists, were 0.68 and 0.702 (all p<0.001). Plateau iris was classified in AS-OCT images by the three graders, rated 32.96%-39.1% and 24.58%-34.08% in the horizontal and vertical axes, respectively. Diagnostic performance was analysed, yielding sensitivity ranging from 56.47% to 77.78%, and specificity of 48.94% to 64.29%. We applied disease prevalence of 30%, revealing positive predictive values varying from 32.16% to 44.44%, and negative predictive values of 72.4% to 85.71%. Accuracy ranged from 51.2% to 65%. Agreement between the two devices was fair, kappa range 0.31-0.351.

CONCLUSION

Performance of manual grading of AS-OCT in detection of DxPIC was relatively poor; therefore, unadjusted AS-OCT does not appear to be good for manual PIC screening in PACD patients and cannot serve as a substitute for UBM in PIC detection.

摘要

目的

评估基于标准超声生物显微镜(UBM)标准在至少两个象限中存在的前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)手动分级对房角关闭性青光眼(PAC)中房角平坦(PI)形态的诊断性能;即,PI 的临床诊断(DxPI)。

方法和分析

在这项横断面研究中,三名青光眼专家评估了配对的 AS-OCT 和 UBM 图像。AS-OCT 分为原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)的两种机制,即 PI 和非 PI,AS-OCT-PIC 的诊断性能通过 DxPI 进行测试。

结果

共纳入 142 例 179 只眼进行分析,85 只眼(47.49%)存在 DxPI。三位分级员对 AS-OCT 分类的观察者内一致性率分别为 0.77、0.701 和 0.742(均<0.001),高级青光眼专家与其他两位青光眼专家之间的观察者间一致性率分别为 0.68 和 0.702(均<0.001)。三位分级员在 AS-OCT 图像中分类 PI,水平轴和垂直轴分别为 32.96%-39.1%和 24.58%-34.08%。分析诊断性能,灵敏度为 56.47%-77.78%,特异性为 48.94%-64.29%。我们应用疾病患病率为 30%,得出阳性预测值为 32.16%-44.44%,阴性预测值为 72.4%-85.71%。准确率为 51.2%-65%。两种设备之间的一致性为中等,kappa 值范围为 0.31-0.351。

结论

DxPI 中手动分级 AS-OCT 的检测性能相对较差;因此,未经调整的 AS-OCT 似乎不适合 PACG 患者的 PI 筛查,也不能替代 UBM 进行 PI 检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff4/8943722/9f915c899d3d/bmjophth-2021-000931f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验