School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, University of Shandong, Jinan, China.
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Jul;30(5):1324-1336. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13628. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
This study examined the validity and reliability of the Analysing and Developing Adaptability and Performance in Teams to Enhance Resilience (ADAPTER) Scale in a sample of Chinese nurses.
Nurse shortage caused by job stress in China is becoming more acute, while research on team resilience training among nurses is still rising. To accurately and consistently describe team resilience status prior to training and evaluate the effects of resilience interventions at the team level among nurses, it is critical to develop a valid and reliable Chinese measure.
This was a cross-sectional study of 838 nurses. The scale was translated into Chinese according to Brislin's guidelines. Validity was evaluated by content validity, discriminative validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and convergent validity. Reliability was estimated by item-to-total correlations, internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factor model. Content validity was good and discriminative validity showed a significant discriminative ability. The concurrent validity was acceptable. The reliability was demonstrated with item-to-total correlations of greater than .40, Cronbach's alpha of .97 and intraclass correlation coefficients of .946.
The Chinese version of the scale is a valid and reliable instrument.
The scale can provide insight into nurses' team resilience and thereby inform the development of specific interventions aimed at improving the team resilience of nurses.
本研究旨在检验中文版分析和发展团队适应性和绩效以增强韧性量表（ADAPTER 量表）在护士样本中的效度和信度。
中国因工作压力导致的护士短缺问题日益严峻，而针对护士团队韧性培训的研究仍在兴起。为了在培训前准确且一致地描述团队韧性状况，并在护士群体中评估韧性干预措施的效果，开发一种有效的、可靠的中文测量工具至关重要。
这是一项对 838 名护士的横断面研究。该量表按照 Brislin 的指南被译为中文。通过内容效度、判别效度、探索性和验证性因子分析以及聚合效度来评估效度。通过项目与总分的相关性、内部一致性和重测信度来评估信度。
探索性和验证性因子分析显示出一个四因素模型。内容效度良好，判别效度显示出显著的判别能力。同时效度可接受。项目与总分的相关性大于.40，克朗巴赫 α 系数为.97，组内相关系数为.946，表明信度良好。
中文版量表具有良好的效度和信度。
该量表可深入了解护士的团队韧性，从而为制定旨在提高护士团队韧性的具体干预措施提供依据。
