Xiang Feng, Lin Yifeng, Chen Binwu
Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Perfusion. 2023 May;38(4):698-705. doi: 10.1177/02676591221076284. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
Ticagrelor may be an alternative to aspirin as it provides robust and consistent platelet inhibition. However, the effect of ticagrelor treatment in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has not been well confirmed. We conducted a meta-analysis to appraise whether ticagrelor therapy affects outcomes in CABG patients.
We searched PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, and Cochrane databases from its inception up to 4 December 2020 for randomized controlled trials that assessed ticagrelor versus non-ticagrelor in patients undergoing CABG. The primary outcome was the incidence of saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion at 1 year after CABG. Secondary outcomes were SVG occlusion at 7 days, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and bleeding requiring reoperation.
Seven trials including 4305 patients (2153 randomized to ticagrelor therapy and 2152 to non-ticagrelor therapy) were included. One-hundred and thirty of 1140 patients (11.4%) randomized to the ticagrelor group versus 175 of 1220 patients (14.3%) randomized to the non-ticagrelor group experienced SVG occlusion at 1 year after CABG. Compared to the control group, ticagrelor therapy yielded a significantly lower risk of SVG occlusion [RR 0.79 (0.64-0.97), = 0.03]. In the subgroup analysis, ticagrelor plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone did not decrease the risk of SVG occlusion after 1 year [RR 0.65 (0.40-1.07), = 0.09]. There was no difference in the incidence of SVG occlusion at 7 days [RR 0.67 (0.42-1.06), = 0.09], MACE up to 1 year [RR 0.99 (0.81-1.21), = 0.90], or bleeding requiring reoperation [RR 1.16 (0.80-1.70), = 0.44].
Compared with non-ticagrelor therapy, ticagrelor decreased the risk of saphenous vein graft occlusion after 1 year in patients undergoing elective CABG with saphenous vein grafting.
替格瑞洛可提供强大且持续的血小板抑制作用,可能是阿司匹林的替代药物。然而,替格瑞洛治疗在接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者中的效果尚未得到充分证实。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估替格瑞洛治疗对CABG患者预后的影响。
我们检索了PubMed、Embase、EBSCO和Cochrane数据库,从其创建至2020年12月4日,查找评估替格瑞洛与非替格瑞洛在接受CABG患者中的随机对照试验。主要结局是CABG术后1年隐静脉移植物(SVG)闭塞的发生率。次要结局是术后7天的SVG闭塞、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)以及需要再次手术的出血。
纳入了7项试验,共4305例患者(2153例随机接受替格瑞洛治疗,2152例接受非替格瑞洛治疗)。在接受替格瑞洛治疗组的1140例患者中,有130例(11.4%)在CABG术后1年发生SVG闭塞;而在接受非替格瑞洛治疗组的1220例患者中,有175例(14.3%)发生SVG闭塞。与对照组相比,替格瑞洛治疗使SVG闭塞风险显著降低[风险比(RR)0.79(0.64 - 0.97),P = 0.03]。在亚组分析中,替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林与单独使用阿司匹林相比,1年后并未降低SVG闭塞风险[RR 0.65(0.40 - 1.07),P = 0.09]。术后7天的SVG闭塞发生率[RR 0.67(0.42 - 1.06),P = 0.09]、1年内的MACE发生率[RR 0.99(0.81 - 1.21),P = 0.90]或需要再次手术的出血发生率[RR 1.16(0.80 - 1.70),P = 0.44]均无差异。
与非替格瑞洛治疗相比,替格瑞洛降低了接受择期CABG并使用隐静脉移植物患者术后1年隐静脉移植物闭塞的风险。