• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食物的加工和营养维度是如何相互关联的?基于三种不同食物评分的层级问题。

How are the processing and nutrient dimensions of foods interconnected? an issue of hierarchy based on three different food scores.

机构信息

Siga, Saint-Mandé, France.

出版信息

Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Sep;73(6):770-785. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2022.2060951. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1080/09637486.2022.2060951
PMID:35403522
Abstract

Worldwide, foods are scored with composition indices. However, processing scores are now emerging. The objective of this study was to study the interconnectedness of the degree of processing and composition for 28,747 industrially packaged foods (71.6% of ultra-processed foods, UPFs) representative of retail assortments. The Nutri-score and Traffic Light Labelling System (TLLS) were used to assess the composition, and the Siga index was used to assess the degree of processing. On average, the more nutritionally favourable Nutri-score and TLLS groups exhibited 56.5 and 50.0% UPFs, respectively. Among markers of ultra-processing non-additives mostly included added fat/sugar/fibre/vitamin, animal and/or plant protein isolates, and taste exhausters, while additives mostly included sweeteners and taste exhausters, suggesting that markers of ultra-processing (MUP) are added to foods to improve composition scores. In conclusion, both types of scores are not complementary as such but obey to a fundamental hierarchy: processing first, then composition if necessary.

摘要

全球范围内,食品都采用成分指数进行评分。然而,目前加工评分也开始出现。本研究的目的是研究 28747 种工业化包装食品(71.6%为超加工食品 UPF)的加工程度和成分之间的相互关系,这些食品代表了零售品种。Nutri-score 和红绿灯标签系统(TLLS)用于评估成分,Siga 指数用于评估加工程度。平均而言,营养评分和 TLLS 组中营养更有利的组别分别显示 56.5%和 50.0%的 UPF。在超加工非添加剂的标志物中,主要包括添加的脂肪/糖/纤维/维生素、动物和/或植物蛋白分离物以及口味耗尽剂,而添加剂主要包括甜味剂和口味耗尽剂,这表明超加工标志物(MUP)被添加到食品中以提高成分评分。总之,这两种类型的评分并不是互补的,而是遵循一个基本的层次结构:首先是加工,然后如果需要再考虑成分。

相似文献

1
How are the processing and nutrient dimensions of foods interconnected? an issue of hierarchy based on three different food scores.食物的加工和营养维度是如何相互关联的?基于三种不同食物评分的层级问题。
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Sep;73(6):770-785. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2022.2060951. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
2
The holistico-reductionist Siga classification according to the degree of food processing: an evaluation of ultra-processed foods in French supermarkets.根据食品加工程度的整体还原分类:法国超市中超加工食品的评估。
Food Funct. 2020 Mar 1;11(3):2026-2039. doi: 10.1039/c9fo02271f. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Organic food retailing: to what extent are foods processed and do they contain markers of ultra-processing?有机食品零售:加工食品的程度如何,它们是否含有超加工的标志物?
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Mar;73(2):172-183. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2021.1966395. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
4
Cross-Classification Analysis of Food Products Based on Nutritional Quality and Degree of Processing.基于营养质量和加工程度的食品分类分析。
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 12;15(14):3117. doi: 10.3390/nu15143117.
5
The share of ultra-processed foods and the overall nutritional quality of diets in the US: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study.美国超加工食品的份额及饮食的整体营养质量:一项具有全国代表性的横断面研究的证据。
Popul Health Metr. 2017 Feb 14;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12963-017-0119-3.
6
[Nutri-Score and ultra-processing: two different, complementary, non-contradictory dimensions].[营养评分与超加工食品:两个不同、互补且不矛盾的维度]
Nutr Hosp. 2021 Feb 23;38(1):201-206. doi: 10.20960/nh.03483.
7
Evaluation of the nutritional quality of ultra-processed foods (ready to eat + fast food): Fatty acids, sugar, and sodium.超加工食品(即食+快餐)营养质量评价:脂肪酸、糖和钠。
J Food Sci. 2022 Aug;87(8):3659-3676. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16235. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
8
Nutritional Quality and Degree of Processing of Children's Foods Assessment on the French Market.法国市场儿童食品的营养质量和加工程度评估。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 30;14(1):171. doi: 10.3390/nu14010171.
9
Processed and ultra-processed foods are associated with lower-quality nutrient profiles in children from Colombia.加工食品和超加工食品与哥伦比亚儿童较差的营养状况有关。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):142-147. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017000891. Epub 2017 May 30.
10
Beyond nutrient-based food indices: a data mining approach to search for a quantitative holistic index reflecting the degree of food processing and including physicochemical properties.超越基于营养素的食物指数:一种数据挖掘方法,用于寻找一种定量的整体指数,反映食物加工程度,并包含物理化学性质。
Food Funct. 2018 Jan 24;9(1):561-572. doi: 10.1039/c7fo01423f.

引用本文的文献

1
Definitions of ultra-processed foods beyond NOVA: a systematic review and evaluation.超越NOVA分类法的超加工食品定义:一项系统综述与评估
Food Nutr Res. 2025 Jun 16;69. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v69.12217. eCollection 2025.
2
Translating the Brazilian Dietary Guidelines into clinical practice: innovative strategies for healthcare professionals.将巴西饮食指南转化为临床实践:医疗保健专业人员的创新策略。
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 3;69(1):e240142. doi: 10.20945/2359-4292-2024-0142.
3
Prostate Cancer Severity in Relation to Level of Food Processing.
前列腺癌严重程度与食品加工水平的关系
Nutrients. 2023 Sep 16;15(18):4010. doi: 10.3390/nu15184010.
4
A Little Bird Told Me… Nutri-Score Panoramas from a Flight over Europe, Connecting Science and Society.《小小鸟告诉我……欧洲上空的 Nutri-Score 全景图:连接科学与社会》
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 28;15(15):3367. doi: 10.3390/nu15153367.
5
Association between ultra-processed foods intake with lipid profile: a cross-sectional study.超加工食品摄入与血脂谱的关系:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 4;13(1):7258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34451-x.
6
Ultra-Processed Foods in University Students: Implementing Nutri-Score to Make Healthy Choices.大学生中的超加工食品:采用营养评分以做出健康选择。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 25;10(6):984. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10060984.