Suppr超能文献

食物的加工和营养维度是如何相互关联的?基于三种不同食物评分的层级问题。

How are the processing and nutrient dimensions of foods interconnected? an issue of hierarchy based on three different food scores.

机构信息

Siga, Saint-Mandé, France.

出版信息

Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Sep;73(6):770-785. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2022.2060951. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

Abstract

Worldwide, foods are scored with composition indices. However, processing scores are now emerging. The objective of this study was to study the interconnectedness of the degree of processing and composition for 28,747 industrially packaged foods (71.6% of ultra-processed foods, UPFs) representative of retail assortments. The Nutri-score and Traffic Light Labelling System (TLLS) were used to assess the composition, and the Siga index was used to assess the degree of processing. On average, the more nutritionally favourable Nutri-score and TLLS groups exhibited 56.5 and 50.0% UPFs, respectively. Among markers of ultra-processing non-additives mostly included added fat/sugar/fibre/vitamin, animal and/or plant protein isolates, and taste exhausters, while additives mostly included sweeteners and taste exhausters, suggesting that markers of ultra-processing (MUP) are added to foods to improve composition scores. In conclusion, both types of scores are not complementary as such but obey to a fundamental hierarchy: processing first, then composition if necessary.

摘要

全球范围内,食品都采用成分指数进行评分。然而,目前加工评分也开始出现。本研究的目的是研究 28747 种工业化包装食品(71.6%为超加工食品 UPF)的加工程度和成分之间的相互关系,这些食品代表了零售品种。Nutri-score 和红绿灯标签系统(TLLS)用于评估成分,Siga 指数用于评估加工程度。平均而言,营养评分和 TLLS 组中营养更有利的组别分别显示 56.5%和 50.0%的 UPF。在超加工非添加剂的标志物中,主要包括添加的脂肪/糖/纤维/维生素、动物和/或植物蛋白分离物以及口味耗尽剂,而添加剂主要包括甜味剂和口味耗尽剂,这表明超加工标志物(MUP)被添加到食品中以提高成分评分。总之,这两种类型的评分并不是互补的,而是遵循一个基本的层次结构:首先是加工,然后如果需要再考虑成分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验