Suppr超能文献

谁有不同种族的朋友,这取决于背景吗?开放性(对他人),而不是宜人性,预测友谊网络中较低的种族同质性。

Who has different-race friends, and does it depend on context? Openness (to other), but not agreeableness, predicts lower racial homophily in friendship networks.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):894-919. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000413.

Abstract

People form relationships with people from their own racial groups, a phenomenon called , which reduces interracial contact and exacerbates inequality and prejudice. Although viewed as arising from environmental factors, we argue that racial homophily also involves individual choice and, thus, personality factors. We address three major issues. First, are interpersonal concerns (Agreeableness) and intergroup concerns (Openness) differentially relevant to cross-race friendships? Second, are current conceptions of Openness sufficient, or do we need lower-level facets more attuned to intergroup concerns? Third, can we specify the interplay between personality and contextual factors in different settings? Across four studies (total N = 1,820), failed to predict more cross-race friendships, in both self- and peer reports, suggesting that interpersonal kindness was not sufficient to overcome racial homophily. In contrast, Openness and (O2, a new social facet of Openness) consistently predicted cross-race friendship. However, the O2 facet had the stronger and only unique effect, suggesting it is the "active ingredient." High-O2 individuals had an almost equal 1:1 ratio of same-to-different-race network members, whereas low-O2 individuals had 4:1 same-race. These results held for both college students and middle-aged adults, both friends and new acquaintances in the network, and both networks established before and at a diverse university. Finally, when moving to a more diverse environment, high-O2 individuals seemed to take advantage of the new environmental affordances, adding more different-race members to their networks. Overall, these studies advance understanding of person-environment transactions, showing how personality traits matter to the structure of people's social networks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

人们与自己种族群体的人建立关系,这种现象称为种族同质性,它减少了种族间的接触,加剧了不平等和偏见。尽管种族同质性被认为是由环境因素引起的,但我们认为,种族同质性也涉及个人选择,因此也涉及个性因素。我们解决了三个主要问题。首先,人际关系关注(宜人性)和群体间关注(开放性)与跨种族友谊有何不同?其次,当前的开放性概念是否足够,或者我们是否需要更能适应群体间关注的更低层次的方面?第三,我们能否在不同环境中具体说明个性和环境因素之间的相互作用?在四项研究中(总 N=1820),人际关系关注和开放性(开放性的新社交方面)未能预测更多的跨种族友谊,无论是自我报告还是同伴报告,这表明人际交往中的善良不足以克服种族同质性。相比之下,开放性和开放性的新社交方面(O2)一致预测了跨种族友谊。然而,O2 方面具有更强且唯一的影响,这表明它是“有效成分”。高 O2 个体的同种族和异种族网络成员的比例几乎相等,为 1:1,而低 O2 个体的比例为 4:1。这些结果适用于大学生和中年成年人、网络中的朋友和新相识,以及在多元化大学之前和之后建立的网络。最后,当搬到一个更加多样化的环境中时,高 O2 个体似乎利用了新的环境可及性,将更多的异种族成员添加到他们的网络中。总的来说,这些研究推进了对人与环境相互作用的理解,展示了个性特征如何影响人们社交网络的结构。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验