• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF):男性和女性的测量不变性。

Personality inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF): Measurement invariance across men and women.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences and Psychology, Federation University Australia.

College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2023 May;14(3):334-338. doi: 10.1037/per0000569. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1037/per0000569
PMID:35404647
Abstract

The study examined the measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar, and residual) of the Personality Inventory for Brief Form (PID-5-BF; Krueger et al., 2013) across gender for the theorized Five-Factor oblique model. A large group of adults ( = 502), with ages ranging from 18 to 67 years, from the Australian general community completed the PID-5-BF. When the Δ² test was applied, multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis supported configural invariance and full metric and residual invariance. For scalar invariance, at least seven items (constituting 13 thresholds) across the different dimensions lacked invariance for one or more of its thresholds. In addition, controlling all these noninvariance thresholds, women had higher latent mean scores for Negative Affect, and men had higher scores for Antagonism and Disinhibition. When the Δcomparative fit index (ΔCFI) test was applied, the findings also supported the configural invariance model and the full metric and residual invariance models. With the exception of one threshold, all the other thresholds were also invariant. The psychometric and practical implications of the findings are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

该研究考察了人格量表简式 (PID-5-BF; Krueger 等人,2013) 理论上的五因素斜交模型在性别上的测量不变性 (结构不变性、度量不变性、标度不变性和残差不变性)。一个由来自澳大利亚普通社区的 502 名年龄在 18 至 67 岁之间的成年人组成的大组完成了 PID-5-BF。当应用 Δ² 检验时,多组验证性因子分析支持结构不变性以及完全度量和残差不变性。对于标度不变性,至少有七个项目 (构成 13 个阈值) 在不同维度上存在一个或多个阈值的不变性。此外,控制所有这些非不变性阈值,女性在负性情绪方面的潜在平均分数更高,而男性在对抗和去抑制方面的分数更高。当应用 Δ比较拟合指数 (ΔCFI) 检验时,研究结果也支持结构不变性模型以及完全度量和残差不变性模型。除了一个阈值外,所有其他阈值也都是不变的。讨论了这些发现的心理测量和实际意义。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Personality inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF): Measurement invariance across men and women.DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF):男性和女性的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2023 May;14(3):334-338. doi: 10.1037/per0000569. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
2
Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 across U.S. East Asian, Southeast Asian, and White participants.DSM-5 人格问卷在美国东亚裔、东南亚裔和白种人群体中的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2024 Jan;15(1):1-10. doi: 10.1037/per0000647. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
Multinational evaluation of the measurement invariance of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-brief form 2.0: Comparison of student and community samples across seven countries.多国家评估人格功能水平量表-简式 2.0 的测量不变性:七个国家学生和社区样本的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2022 Dec;34(12):1112-1125. doi: 10.1037/pas0001176. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
5
Examining Measurement Invariance in the Personality Inventory for -5 Brief Form Across Sexual and Gender Minority Status.检验性少数和性别少数群体状态下的 -5 项简短人格量表的测量不变性。
Assessment. 2024 Apr;31(3):678-697. doi: 10.1177/10731911231176449. Epub 2023 May 29.
6
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.
7
[The alternative model of personality disorders among the French population: Assessment with brief tools].[法国人群中人格障碍的替代模型:使用简短工具进行评估]
Encephale. 2023 Oct;49(5):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
8
Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex.DSM-5 第三部分病理性人格特质模型在性别上的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):114-122. doi: 10.1037/per0000291. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
9
Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance in the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.DSM-5 人格量表的跨文化测量不变性。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Oct;304:114134. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114134. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Validation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) with Iranian University Students and Clinical Samples: Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, and Convergent, Discriminant, and Known-Groups Validity.DSM-5 简明人格量表(PID-5-BF)在伊朗大学生和临床样本中的验证:因子结构、测量不变性以及聚合、区别和已知群体有效性。
J Pers Assess. 2023 May-Jun;105(3):371-381. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2022.2152347. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) according to DSM-5 revision criteria.根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订标准,人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)的有效性、可靠性和临床实用性。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Oct;24(3):319-340. doi: 10.1002/wps.21339.
2
Gender bias in assessing narcissistic personality: Exploring the utility of the ICD-11 dimensional model.评估自恋型人格中的性别偏见:探索《国际疾病分类第11版》维度模型的效用
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Jun;64(2):248-264. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12503. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across sex.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表在不同性别间的测量不变性。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 8;15:1328937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1328937. eCollection 2024.
4
Shame-coping clusters: comparisons regarding attachment insecurities, mentalizing deficits, and personality pathology, controlling for general emotion dysregulation.羞耻应对集群:关于依恋不安全感、心理化缺陷和人格病理学的比较,控制一般情绪失调。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Sep 8;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40479-023-00231-2.
5
Assessing the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across Black and White americans.评估 DSM-5 人格量表在黑人和白种美国人中的测量不变性。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Sep;35(9):721-728. doi: 10.1037/pas0001255. Epub 2023 Jun 29.