• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-5 第三部分病理性人格特质模型在性别上的测量不变性。

Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.

Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):114-122. doi: 10.1037/per0000291. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1037/per0000291
PMID:29952589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6310673/
Abstract

The dimensional pathological personality trait model proposed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), Section III Criterion B, has shown promising results for its validity and utility in conceptualizing personality pathology. However, as its structural equivalence across sex is yet to be tested, the validity for the model across males and females remains uncertain. In the present article, we examined sex measurement invariance of the DSM-5 trait model in a large undergraduate sample using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. A series of confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses suggested that, although the exact facet-domain relationships as specified in the DSM-5 were not observed, the facets generally organize into a model with five latent factors similar to those listed in the DSM-5 Section III Criterion B. Further, these five factors were fully measurement invariant across sex at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. Examination of the latent trait mean levels suggests that females tend to have higher scores on latent Negative Affectivity, whereas males tend to have higher scores on latent Antagonism, Detachment, Psychoticism, and Disinhibition. These results indicate that the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model is fully structurally equivalent across sex, a property that is lacking in the traditional categorical model in Section II. This further validates the use of the dimensional DSM-5 trait model for personality disorder assessment and conceptualization in both research and clinical settings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)第三部分标准 B 中提出的维度病理性人格特质模型,在概念化人格病理学方面,其有效性和实用性已经得到了证明。然而,由于其在性别上的结构等价性尚未得到检验,因此该模型在男性和女性中的有效性仍不确定。在本文中,我们使用 DSM-5 人格量表检验了 DSM-5 特质模型在一个大型本科生样本中的性别测量不变性。一系列验证性和探索性因素分析表明,尽管没有观察到 DSM-5 中规定的具体特质-领域关系,但这些特质通常可以组织成一个具有五个潜在因素的模型,与 DSM-5 第三部分标准 B 中列出的因素相似。此外,这五个因素在配置、度量和标度水平上在性别上具有完全的测量不变性。对潜在特质均值水平的考察表明,女性在潜在的负性情感上的得分往往较高,而男性在潜在的对抗性、分离性、精神病性和去抑制性上的得分往往较高。这些结果表明,DSM-5 第三部分病理性人格特质模型在性别上具有完全的结构等价性,而第二部分的传统分类模型则缺乏这一特性。这进一步验证了在研究和临床环境中,使用 DSM-5 维度特质模型对人格障碍进行评估和概念化的有效性。(美国心理协会,2019,所有权利保留)。

相似文献

1
Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex.DSM-5 第三部分病理性人格特质模型在性别上的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):114-122. doi: 10.1037/per0000291. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
A Family Study of the Section III Personality Pathology Model Using the Personality Inventory for the (PID-5).采用《人格障碍检查表第五版》(PID-5)对 第三节人格病理学模型进行的家系研究。
J Pers Disord. 2018 Dec;32(6):753-765. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_323. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
Comparing the dependability and associations with functioning of the DSM-5 Section III trait model of personality pathology and the DSM-5 Section II personality disorder model.比较《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)第三部分人格病理学特质模型和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)第二部分人格障碍模型的可靠性及其与功能的关联。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):228-236. doi: 10.1037/per0000213. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
4
Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 across U.S. East Asian, Southeast Asian, and White participants.DSM-5 人格问卷在美国东亚裔、东南亚裔和白种人群体中的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2024 Jan;15(1):1-10. doi: 10.1037/per0000647. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
5
Discrepancies in self- and informant-reports of personality pathology: Examining the DSM-5 Section III trait model.个体自身报告与知情者报告的人格病理学差异:检验 DSM-5 第三部分特质模型。
Personal Disord. 2019 Sep;10(5):456-467. doi: 10.1037/per0000342. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
6
Examining the relations among the DSM-5 alternative model of personality, the five-factor model, and externalizing and internalizing behavior.探讨 DSM-5 人格替代模型、五因素模型以及外显和内隐行为之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jul;9(4):379-384. doi: 10.1037/per0000240. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
7
Continuity between interview-rated personality disorders and self-reported DSM-5 traits in a Danish psychiatric sample.丹麦精神病学样本中访谈评定的人格障碍与自我报告的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版特质之间的连续性。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):261-267. doi: 10.1037/per0000171. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
9
Clarifying the interstitial nature of facets from the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 using the five factor model of personality.使用 DSM-5 人格量表的五因素模型来澄清人格障碍检查表的特质间性质。
Personal Disord. 2019 Jul;10(4):330-339. doi: 10.1037/per0000327. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
Personality inventory for DSM-5, Brief Form: Factor structure, reliability, and coefficient of congruence.DSM-5 人格量表简式本:因素结构、信度和同质性系数。
Personal Disord. 2020 Jan;11(1):69-77. doi: 10.1037/per0000364. Epub 2019 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Maladaptive personality traits (DSM-5 AMPD, Criterion B) and depression among medical students in Egypt: a multicentric cross-sectional study.埃及医科学生的适应不良人格特质(《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版成人版人格障碍,标准B)与抑郁:一项多中心横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 7;13(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02784-z.
2
Gender bias in assessing narcissistic personality: Exploring the utility of the ICD-11 dimensional model.评估自恋型人格中的性别偏见:探索《国际疾病分类第11版》维度模型的效用
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Jun;64(2):248-264. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12503. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across sex.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表在不同性别间的测量不变性。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 8;15:1328937. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1328937. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessing the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across Black and White americans.评估 DSM-5 人格量表在黑人和白种美国人中的测量不变性。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Sep;35(9):721-728. doi: 10.1037/pas0001255. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID-5)在葡萄牙和阿拉伯联合酋长国社区及临床人群中的跨文化研究。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022 Aug 26;18:e174501792207130. doi: 10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130. eCollection 2022.
6
Structure of Pathological Personality Traits Through the Lens of the CAT-PD Model.通过 CAT-PD 模型透视病理性人格特质的结构。
Assessment. 2023 Oct;30(7):2276-2295. doi: 10.1177/10731911221143343. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
7
Identity Development and Maladaptive Personality Traits in Young Refugees and First- and Second-Generation Migrants.年轻难民及第一代和第二代移民的身份认同发展与适应不良的人格特质
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 21;12:798152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.798152. eCollection 2021.
8
Alternative model of personality disorders traits predict residential addictions treatment completion.替代人格障碍特征模型预测住院成瘾治疗的完成。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Nov 1;228:109011. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109011. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Female Narcissism: Assessment, Aetiology, and Behavioural Manifestations.女性自恋:评估、病因和行为表现。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Dec;125(6):2833-2864. doi: 10.1177/00332941211027322. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
10
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Structural Models for Binary Repeated Measures: Linking Modern Longitudinal Structural Equation Models to Conventional Categorical Data Analysis for Matched Pairs.二元重复测量的结构模型:将现代纵向结构方程模型与匹配对的传统分类数据分析相联系
Struct Equ Modeling. 2017;24(4):626-635. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1276837. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
2
A population based twin study of DSM-5 maladaptive personality domains.基于人群的 DSM-5 适应不良人格领域的双胞胎研究。
Personal Disord. 2017 Oct;8(4):366-375. doi: 10.1037/per0000220. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
Current trends in BPD research as indicative of a broader sea-change in psychiatric nosology.当前 BPD 研究的趋势表明精神病学分类学发生了更广泛的变化。
Personal Disord. 2016 Oct;7(4):334-343. doi: 10.1037/per0000199.
4
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
5
Convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of DSM-5 traits.DSM-5 特质的会聚、区别和效标效度。
Personal Disord. 2016 Oct;7(4):394-404. doi: 10.1037/per0000165. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
6
Capturing the DSM-5 Alternative Personality Disorder Model Traits in the Five-Factor Model's Nomological Net.在五因素模型的概念网络中捕捉《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的替代人格障碍模型特质。
J Pers. 2017 Apr;85(2):220-231. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12235. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
7
Measurement Invariance and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: Asian International and Euro American Cultural Groups.测量不变性与人格五因素模型:亚洲国际群体和欧美文化群体
Assessment. 2016 Oct;23(5):571-87. doi: 10.1177/1073191115590854. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
8
A metastructural model of mental disorders and pathological personality traits.精神障碍与病理性人格特质的元结构模型。
Psychol Med. 2015 Aug;45(11):2309-19. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715000252. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
9
Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.检验DSM-5人格障碍特质模型能否通过精简项目集进行测量:对《DSM-5人格问卷》的项目反应理论研究
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1195-210. doi: 10.1037/pas0000120. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
10
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中替代人格障碍模型特质作为五因素模型的适应不良极端变体:一项项目反应理论分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):343-54. doi: 10.1037/abn0000035. Epub 2015 Feb 9.