Suppr超能文献

DSM-5 第三部分病理性人格特质模型在性别上的测量不变性。

Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University.

Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):114-122. doi: 10.1037/per0000291. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Abstract

The dimensional pathological personality trait model proposed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), Section III Criterion B, has shown promising results for its validity and utility in conceptualizing personality pathology. However, as its structural equivalence across sex is yet to be tested, the validity for the model across males and females remains uncertain. In the present article, we examined sex measurement invariance of the DSM-5 trait model in a large undergraduate sample using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. A series of confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses suggested that, although the exact facet-domain relationships as specified in the DSM-5 were not observed, the facets generally organize into a model with five latent factors similar to those listed in the DSM-5 Section III Criterion B. Further, these five factors were fully measurement invariant across sex at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. Examination of the latent trait mean levels suggests that females tend to have higher scores on latent Negative Affectivity, whereas males tend to have higher scores on latent Antagonism, Detachment, Psychoticism, and Disinhibition. These results indicate that the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model is fully structurally equivalent across sex, a property that is lacking in the traditional categorical model in Section II. This further validates the use of the dimensional DSM-5 trait model for personality disorder assessment and conceptualization in both research and clinical settings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)第三部分标准 B 中提出的维度病理性人格特质模型,在概念化人格病理学方面,其有效性和实用性已经得到了证明。然而,由于其在性别上的结构等价性尚未得到检验,因此该模型在男性和女性中的有效性仍不确定。在本文中,我们使用 DSM-5 人格量表检验了 DSM-5 特质模型在一个大型本科生样本中的性别测量不变性。一系列验证性和探索性因素分析表明,尽管没有观察到 DSM-5 中规定的具体特质-领域关系,但这些特质通常可以组织成一个具有五个潜在因素的模型,与 DSM-5 第三部分标准 B 中列出的因素相似。此外,这五个因素在配置、度量和标度水平上在性别上具有完全的测量不变性。对潜在特质均值水平的考察表明,女性在潜在的负性情感上的得分往往较高,而男性在潜在的对抗性、分离性、精神病性和去抑制性上的得分往往较高。这些结果表明,DSM-5 第三部分病理性人格特质模型在性别上具有完全的结构等价性,而第二部分的传统分类模型则缺乏这一特性。这进一步验证了在研究和临床环境中,使用 DSM-5 维度特质模型对人格障碍进行评估和概念化的有效性。(美国心理协会,2019,所有权利保留)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Female Narcissism: Assessment, Aetiology, and Behavioural Manifestations.女性自恋:评估、病因和行为表现。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Dec;125(6):2833-2864. doi: 10.1177/00332941211027322. Epub 2021 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

4
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
5
Convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of DSM-5 traits.DSM-5 特质的会聚、区别和效标效度。
Personal Disord. 2016 Oct;7(4):394-404. doi: 10.1037/per0000165. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验